DenWil

Unless you included the images only for reference...i.e. there was a bird and I did take photos of it...  why reduce the files to .5 from 20.9 ?

I  added a D810 to my MF film cameras. I have shot  MF film  for over a quarter century. Not really migration so much as another tool in the tool chest. I have never used  the live view option.

Hopefully Amazon, Starbucks and any other companies impacted will get out. Smaller companies  will be next   followed by Individuals  making six figures who should be pre-planning their exit ...

Absolutely. Credibility  is important once the comments get beyond the I like it or I don't like it stage. It can easily depend on  the work and who the target audience is as well.  Generating ...

He looks awful here.  Nails on a chalkboard. If that is the  stage persona he's successfully designed for his audience  then job well done. And you recorded it perfectly.

I don't care any more about a potential Nikon mirrorless- with or without a different mount-  than I do about  evolving battery vehicles or robots... in other words, zilch. I have cameras now I ...

I already have. No  issues with the download  or subsequent functionality.

ISO comes first.  It mostly never changes. 64.  With film ASA 85. It never changes. I do a rough frame of the content.   Choose aperture.  Depends on content.  People figure  f4 or  f5.6 on 35mm, ...

I disagree with everyone  as to why it  does not work.

I figure this is a joke thread.  But I'll post one. Not rocket science. No modifiers, reflectors or electrics. On this particular day we Just showed up and waded out and stood in the lake.

iPhone images go there automatically. Images chosen for posting on Instagram go there. Using it implies  active participation on my part. I  perform no processing tasks within that application. ...

Never come across anyone with that title. I have learned from academics, art directors, agents, gallery owners and bookers  among many others over the years but never a photography coach.

I very much like  two and three.  As they are. Four unfortunately looks identical to what happens when film is exposed to light during processing. Made the film useless.  Imbibes a very negative ...

I have never turned out images which did not accurately portray the content in the viewfinder at the moment of exposure. It has in fact  been a mainstay  of my work in that clients, agents and ...

If the weight aspect of a 35mm camera is even a factor to be considered (and you singled weight out  as an issue)  then you should  not  upgrade. That D850's kilo -2.22 pounds -  don't even ...

It is typical of this site that people do not answer the question and move on.  The desperation for interaction and validation is  sad. The OP's post is  so poorly constructed you might almost ...

This will prove entertaining. Parents buying clothes they don't approve of, parents paying for a photographer  so kids posing slutty for fun have senior pics, and DPR members up on their soapboxes ...

I am so at home in this photo. It was good to see whether you win the contest or not. Cheers.

When does it stop being photography ...and become CGI? When the content is not in the ...I guess I would need to qualify it as an optical viewfinder.

I have never seen  this result in my own work.  The differences in our  settings are as follows: Target size is 11x14 inches, trimming off,  unsharp mask is usually off or minimum,  digital ice off. ...