Seedeich

Lives in Denmark Denmark
Joined on Jan 22, 2010

Comments

Total: 20, showing: 1 – 20

Interesting idea.

They should get rid of the battery as well and use that old school film transportation lever to produce just enough electricity to record the image and to drive the light meter.
With a couple of spare SD cards you could shoot forever off the grid.

Would be even better if Nikon made a FM-style DSLR without LCD and thumb-lever charged.

Link | Posted on Apr 28, 2016 at 21:51 UTC as 230th comment | 2 replies

I wonder what the GN is at 105mm.
For the Nikon SB-910 the GN is 53 at 200mm and 49 at 105mm.
Does this mean the GN would be around / almost 56 at 105mm for the i60? That would be a stop more than the i40.
Hard to believe for this little flash.

But then again,,, it’s hard to believe what the i40 is able to do.

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2016 at 23:03 UTC as 5th comment

For a long time I’ve longed for a digital camera with simple manual focussing. Zone focussing, where you can easily adjust the zone with a quick movement of the finger.
Old viewfinder streetshooter style.
If the rest of the electronic is as fast and easy to operate as an analog camera this is an attractive camera.

I never had a Leica, never liked rangefinder focussing, never found Leica prices attractive… but the Q strikes a cord.
(And one can always put gaffer tape on the red dot or paint it black)

Link | Posted on Jun 11, 2015 at 22:40 UTC as 69th comment

For the time being I’m ok with my private LR license.

But this subscription-based model means, considering a private Photoshop license is out of question. I simply don't trust Adobe.

It’s kind of ironic - we ditch big and heavy DSLR systems for small and lightweight mirrorless systems. Why on earth should we be interested in an expensive and rigid subscription-based model?

Link | Posted on May 9, 2013 at 00:09 UTC as 708th comment
In reply to:

Braxton7: I like the snakeskin one best http://2.static.img-dpreview.com/files/news/8207632916/Lunar4.jpg?v=1584 That flash looks baddass with it :)

They only have to glue some snakeskin on the lenses as well and I'll buy it.

Link | Posted on Sep 18, 2012 at 21:30 UTC
In reply to:

Seedeich: After this... which professional photographer wants to use Hasselblad?
It might become a reputation disaster.

From a design point of view...
The carbon fiber version looks quite cool... if there weren’t these Rolex dials.
The lenses look totally out of place.
That flimsy pop-up flash on a gold body... ridiculous.
Didn’t they have time or competent designers to finish the project if they really want to go the kitsch-route?

Marty, I’m aware of that it’s not targeted at photographers.
The problem is, that they do it under the Hasselblad label.
Before this, the name Hasselblad was only associated with pro-photo-tools, even if lots of their customers where non-pros, who want to buy into a prestigious label.
Now the label Hasselblad is f*** associated with kitsch.
Seems to be a great achievement. Grrr.

Link | Posted on Sep 18, 2012 at 21:11 UTC

After this... which professional photographer wants to use Hasselblad?
It might become a reputation disaster.

From a design point of view...
The carbon fiber version looks quite cool... if there weren’t these Rolex dials.
The lenses look totally out of place.
That flimsy pop-up flash on a gold body... ridiculous.
Didn’t they have time or competent designers to finish the project if they really want to go the kitsch-route?

Link | Posted on Sep 18, 2012 at 20:34 UTC as 253rd comment | 3 replies
On photo Aarhus in Seedeich's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

contrast detect

Link | Posted on Jan 18, 2012 at 22:36 UTC as 1st comment
On photo 3-Zimmer in Seedeich's photo gallery (2 comments in total)

it's phase detect, not contrast

Link | Posted on Jan 18, 2012 at 22:32 UTC as 1st comment
On photo Alt_Hamurg in Seedeich's photo gallery (2 comments in total)

actually phase detect, not contrast

Link | Posted on Jan 18, 2012 at 22:29 UTC as 1st comment
On photo DSC_0556-1 in Seedeich's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

phase detect

Link | Posted on Jan 18, 2012 at 22:18 UTC as 1st comment
On photo Karussel in Seedeich's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

phase detect

Link | Posted on Jan 18, 2012 at 22:16 UTC as 1st comment
On photo U-bahn1 in Seedeich's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

contrast detect

Link | Posted on Jan 18, 2012 at 22:14 UTC as 1st comment
On photo S-Bahn_Reeperbahn in Seedeich's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

contrast detect

Link | Posted on Jan 18, 2012 at 22:11 UTC as 1st comment
On photo Alt_Hamurg in Seedeich's photo gallery (2 comments in total)

contrast detect

Link | Posted on Jan 18, 2012 at 22:08 UTC as 2nd comment
On photo meetup in Seedeich's photo gallery (2 comments in total)

contrast detect

Link | Posted on Jan 18, 2012 at 22:06 UTC as 1st comment
On photo DSC_1308-1 in Seedeich's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

contrast detect

Link | Posted on Jan 18, 2012 at 22:05 UTC as 1st comment
On photo DSC_0877-1 in Seedeich's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

phase detect

Link | Posted on Jan 18, 2012 at 22:04 UTC as 1st comment
On photo 3-Zimmer in Seedeich's photo gallery (2 comments in total)

contrast detect

Link | Posted on Jan 18, 2012 at 22:03 UTC as 2nd comment
On photo meetup in Seedeich's photo gallery (2 comments in total)

contrast detect

Link | Posted on Jan 18, 2012 at 22:02 UTC as 2nd comment
Total: 20, showing: 1 – 20