6x9

Thank you for sharing the link to your comparison test. Indeed, those two lenses are quite close in resolution. I mostly use the 33-55mm zoom which needs to be stopped down to f/11-f/16 to get ...

Pentax 645 or 67 lenses can be adapted without much hassle. However, you will not have AF with Pentax lenses on GFX. Canon EF lenses can be used in AF mode (provided that you have an appropriate ...

MF sensors are not only about the print size (which is certainly true). For me it is mainly the dynamic range and possibility to crop. In many cases I do not need to use HDR with my MF camera ...

Plus, consider also the weight of equipment. If you want to cover the same focal lengths with a MF camera as with an APS-C  one, the weight will be  2.5 - 3 x more. On my last trip I had a backpack ...

I have a Pentax 645z which has a similar sensor as the GFX 50s II, as well as an X-T3. Although the dynamic range and low light performance of the X-T3 are pretty good, the 645z beats the Fuji ...

It looks like a decision which goes against Pentax philosophy. Keeping their K-mount backwards-compatible and then introduce artificial limitations like this. A question to Ricoh Marketing department.

I wonder about how fragile it is...

As I have expected, 2-stop improvement is far from being true. Marketing exercise.

As already mentioned - size-wise, the OM-1 with a comparable lens is not much smaller than FF cameras. Still, the OM-1 with 12-100 F/4 lens makes perfect sense as a travel kit. However in a 3+ k$...

Following the Olympus tradition, the OM-10 (if it is ever released) may have just a CD AF system and a small battery.

What's about the dynamic range and flexibility of RAW files in the new camera? Olympus cameras used to produce beautiful JPEGs, no question. But the RAW files were not something you could squeeze...

If Olympus / OMDS exploits the key competitive advantages of the m43 system - compactness and low(er) weight, incredible IBIS - and keep prices at reasonable levels, they will be fine. What I see...