WJMWJM

W(h)ell, while playing around some more, jiggling that loose part, side/side, up/down, I discovered I might have the first-ever and only macro-dedicated Tryx on this planet.....focus range 5-15mm, ...

W(h)ell yes, a picture....darn near impossible, without professional lighting, and a high-magnification macro lens....;)) (I do have plenty of that stuff laying around, from the analog days, but ...

Dear group, In my posession landed a TR100/Tryx with 'broken' lens. From the outside, it's easy to see the malheur; the little 'pinhole' lens disk is floating around inside, only allowing a vague ...

Btw, I might have mentioned it before in this forum, but not in any recent thread, so it seems appropriate here: For the just as tantalising combination of HDR-Art & panorama, and given the very ...

Assume, with 99,9% certainty, diagonal angle of view. (this also matches all my earlier rules of thumb (28mm=74 degrees, 24mm=84, 20mm=94, 17mm=104, 14mm=114; so 135 degrees should be even below ...

Just to complete this topic with that baffling scarce info, FOV, for both LG G5 and G6: (135 vs 125 degrees) http://www.gsmarena.com/lg_g5_vs_samsung_galaxy_s7-review-1433p6.php (with frame raster ...

185 degrees sounds like a full fisheye, or 185 degrees in all directions, cq not just diagonally, right? LG G5 & G6 seems only 'half-fisheye', only bending vertical lines (in landscape ...

Hmm....can HDR-Makeup also be adjusted in strenght, then also as strong as HDR-Art on maximum, '+3'?

Compared to (Android/add-on/aftermarket) Ultimate HDR, Casio's original HDR-Art is much less ugly/blotchy on skin....only too reddish, but kid's eyes, at close range or zoomed in, can turn out magic. ...

That said, Ultimate HDR sucks with skin, any skin. Morbid coal-black blots. And another temptation for future video camera's & applications: HDR-Art video....no such thing yet, as aftermarket ...

21 mm is about 94 degrees view, 17mm about 104, 14mm about 114. The LG G6, 125 degrees view, or close to 11-12mm. There is just no equivalent, at least not in this combination with in-camera ...

Today, indoors, doing some real-estate coverage, I was once again reminded that even the 21mm of my Tryx is still pathetic. However, it is, or better was, the only wide-angle (won't call it ...

If they ever expand back to the dozen of halls they once were, then 4-5 days (4 plus press day?) is not enough.
Even less if they expand the scope to more branches/interests.

To me, most fun of...

Sorry, no matter how much I appreciate technical perfection (plus it being the only way to do HDR/HDR-Art panorama's (until now!)), there is nothing more satifisfying than seeing the...

Was there any particular reason for DP to include *neither* focal length (21mm) *nor* angle of view?
(other than conforming to nearly any other MSM, who made a sport out of this grave omission,...

Thanx for reminding me about that 16mm. Also noticed the FR200, 185 degrees, 13.4mm, but at least that one seems to lack any HDR-functionality; neither regular nor Art is present (not to mention ...

20-1200mm already exists (Panasonic FZ-70 / FZ-72, 1/2.3"), so 16-300mm doesn't seem impossible at all. https://www.dpreview.com/products/panasonic/compacts/panasonic_dmcfz70

While not periscope (either?), Samsung WB210 is another sample; optional 20mm setting (zoom optics visibly & audibly change) versus the regular 24-240mm optical zoom (but no fusion, and sadly the...

Btw, if not for you, then perhaps for others: Without the criterium RAW, a Samsung WB210 would also do. (or, more limited optically/zoom-wise, TR100/Tryx/TRxxx) Only other wide-angle alternatives ...

This probably means both panorama-stitching *and* HDR(-Art) are singificantly slower as well, right? Oddly, I already detected a significant speed difference between TR100/Tryx and ZR200/300/1000; ...