Lives in United States New York, NY, United States
Has a website at http://jakeseliger.com
Joined on Jun 20, 2011


Total: 4, showing: 1 – 4

[i]The Sony RX1R II will ship in November for $3299. Let us know what you think, in the comments.[/i]

I think the camera itself looks great and that $3,300 is absurdly, ridiculously expensive.

Link | Posted on Oct 14, 2015 at 16:51 UTC as 191st comment | 5 replies
On article Olympus PEN E-PL7 First Impressions Review (510 comments in total)
In reply to:

ezed999: While I like this review, it would benefit by cutting Olympus a little slack. This is not an OM-D or even an E-P5. As you point out, starting with a point & shoot interface is strictly marketing. Olympus would like to attract upgraders -- a reasonable goal. There are more of them than there are of us, and without larger markets, these companies will fold and we'll all suffer. We have the skills to customize, so why not have initial set up's that permit less sophisticated users to take pictures out of the box?

Personally, a camera like the PL-7 is a reasonable alternative so that the rest of the family can take better pictures. In my case, I'm hoping my wife, who is a luddite, will use our P-M2 in her travels and gradually learn a little bit about photography. The nice thing about the Pen PL & PM lines, is that you can also save a jazzed up interface and for those occasions when we need it.

What's not to like?


No one but fanboys cares about cutting manufacturers slack. Everyone else just wants a totally awesome camera as cheaply as possible. Apparently relatively few people are buying the E-PLx models. That's because they're not really cheap enough to compete with point and shoots, but they're not really good enough for dedicated photographers to choose over other options.

The E-PL7 would probably entice the point and shoot crowd at $400. The advanced crowd has the EM-5/10 around the same price point, along with Sony's e-mount cameras. Why would anyone spend $700 on an almost-but-not-quite camera? Answer: most people wouldn't.

Link | Posted on Aug 28, 2014 at 19:12 UTC
On article 10 Photo Editing Programs (that aren't Photoshop) (352 comments in total)
In reply to:

pcworth: My Photoshop alternative of choice right now is Flying Meat's Acorn. It has similar features to Pixelmator, but feels more pleasing and fluid to use. I have not done a side-by-side comparison of features, but it covers pretty much what I need. It will open Photoshop files and costs about $30.

Having said that, I still think Photoshop Elements 11 or newer is the way to go if you are looking for something new. Its group shot tool alone makes it worth the purchase price.

Yeah. I'm surprised Acorn didn't get a mention and something like Aperture did; Aperture appears, like most things OS X, not to be on Apple's radar anymore.

Link | Posted on May 20, 2013 at 16:51 UTC
In reply to:

deleted_081301: I expext they will do a Micro four thirds version also
when they get "Around touit" ;)

Exactly. It seems like a weird omission, since they'd just have to offer a different mount.

Link | Posted on May 1, 2013 at 23:39 UTC
Total: 4, showing: 1 – 4