sadwitch

Lives in Australia Melbourne, Australia
Works as a Art director+designer+photographer
Has a website at www.designbykl.com
Joined on Oct 3, 2005

Comments

Total: 196, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

paulfulper: Is this sharper than Sony ff gm 100-400 ?

@ALEX_RAW If you can point me to a site or gallery, I'm really interested to see a real direct comparison with side by side sample images of someone cropping a full frame image shot at 400mm to match a m43 image shot at 800mm.

Link | Posted on Aug 8, 2020 at 13:20 UTC
In reply to:

Memoochi: Maybe the person that trialled this lens would benefit from a photography 101 class.

To me, the processed 1000 pix shows what this lens can do in the right hands. There's no such things as unedited JPEG as all JPEG has each camera company's unique colour science and processing applied to it.

Link | Posted on Aug 4, 2020 at 13:01 UTC

FWIW please do not judge quality base on these DPR images. It's a monster focal length to use and not easy to master, people have to differentiate between reviewer samples and samples shot by field photographers like Robin and Petr Bambousek.

Link | Posted on Aug 4, 2020 at 12:45 UTC as 17th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Ian: To all the critics, I say, don't knock it to you've tried it with the Pixel 3. I played around with the beta and it was good, but the final version is pretty amazing based on what I'm seeing so far.

I have the pixel 1 and it is indeed quite something. I would say go try for yourself and see.

Link | Posted on Nov 18, 2018 at 14:14 UTC
In reply to:

buzzbob: Pointless gimmick. Looks wildly unnatural. Another headline - grabbing marketing ploy. BTW night should look dark, not like a nastily edited daytime pic

Depends on how you view photography innit? what is natural and from what prespective? the human eye? the dog's eye? the fly's eye? Maybe google is showing us how 'robots' can view the world...?

Link | Posted on Nov 18, 2018 at 14:11 UTC
In reply to:

buzzbob: Pointless gimmick. Looks wildly unnatural. Another headline - grabbing marketing ploy. BTW night should look dark, not like a nastily edited daytime pic

I guess you do not own a pixel phone. I tried it on my pixel and it's looks pretty incredible for a phone camera.

Link | Posted on Nov 16, 2018 at 12:01 UTC
In reply to:

duartix: Can someone please confirm these implementations are present in the Google Camera App?

I know there is early support for the APK in some developer Xiaomi MIUI Roms and some specific ports of the APK for a few phones, so you don't need a Pixel phone to get it.

it's available in pixel 1

Link | Posted on Nov 16, 2018 at 11:56 UTC
On article Photokina 2018: First look at new Ricoh GR III (667 comments in total)

I do hope the addition of sensor shift stabiliser will include pixel shift resolution in K1/K3 which i find very useful for still photography

Link | Posted on Sep 26, 2018 at 12:38 UTC as 112th comment | 1 reply

I think this is a great way to test a camera and the photos are better than most sample gallery. Good job!

Link | Posted on Dec 7, 2016 at 12:19 UTC as 71st comment
In reply to:

Sir Corey of Deane: With the ease of photo fakery, EVERY image on the Web can be questioned and thus the value of these blah blah blah awards, competitions etc.

I've seen what I consider better pics posted by 'ordinary' DPReview members.

Imagine a day when all photos are only displayed in RAW...... I'll give up looking at galleries and probably photography.

Link | Posted on Dec 4, 2016 at 20:42 UTC
On article Ultimate OM-D: Olympus E-M1 Mark II Review (1397 comments in total)
In reply to:

nokinonacynos: Looks like an amazing cam. However, I think MFT will continue to struggle. Once the cam is not pocketable, size becomes less of an advantage. People are realizing that a certain size is required for comfort and ergonomics. With a Pro lens, the package is similar to APC. So no advantage. In fact, the 25mm 1.2 is bigger, heavier and much more expensive than a 35mm f/2 for APC let alone a 50mm f/1.8 for FF.

This camera will have to sell on inherent qualities rather than size and weight.

WOW! the lack of moire and false colour is amazing. It's interesting to see how 4 different cameras can render high frequency patterns so differently especially in the illustrations. Thanks for highlighting.

Link | Posted on Nov 26, 2016 at 07:12 UTC
On article Throwback Thursday: Olympus C-3040 Zoom (125 comments in total)

I had the c7070/c8080... both are excellently built imaging machines. The lens on the c8080 is just incredible at that time and i still think the flip up and twist LCD on the c7070 is easier to use compare to side hinged type

Link | Posted on Nov 10, 2016 at 11:58 UTC as 81st comment
On article Throwback Thursday: Canon PowerShot Pro70 (112 comments in total)

This was Singapore 17years ago! Much has changed.

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2016 at 21:41 UTC as 55th comment
On a photo in the Leica Q Real-world sample gallery sample gallery (1 comment in total)

Love the look but the banding is pretty noticeable

Link | Posted on Sep 1, 2015 at 11:18 UTC as 1st comment
On article 2014 iPhone Photography Awards winners announced (102 comments in total)

Nice. Really nice.

Link | Posted on Jun 15, 2014 at 12:40 UTC as 39th comment
In reply to:

Dave Deacon: Staging images is as good as finding something by chance that works. The result is what matters and these are fantastic fun images. I've watched and enjoyed many films/TV shows most of which were scripted.

Beautifully captured and me thinks photography is about everything under and beyond the sun. It's only the imagination that's limiting.

Link | Posted on Jun 15, 2014 at 00:27 UTC
On article Lytro announces Illum light field camera (349 comments in total)
In reply to:

ironcam: I don't see the point of this thing. I have seen some samples and it looks really soft even when something is in focus.

FYI the original canon 1D is a 4MP camera and it's used for most things back then

Link | Posted on Apr 23, 2014 at 03:14 UTC
On article In photos: Swimming with jellyfish (23 comments in total)

Brilliant!

Link | Posted on Apr 5, 2014 at 13:01 UTC as 15th comment
On article Shockproof flagship: Olympus 'drops' new Tough TG-3 (107 comments in total)

It looks great indeed. Should consider a product placement in transformers 5 in a camera transforming robot.

Link | Posted on Apr 1, 2014 at 12:17 UTC as 12th comment | 1 reply
On article Olympus OM-D E-M10 brings E-M5 down to size (53 comments in total)
In reply to:

PhotoHawk: Truly disappointing - nothing new here. It is the same Olympus strategy we've seen before. The same box, slightly different dials, same IQ, same sensor, the same performance. Do you want fries with this or do you want home fries.

Think back to the EP1, EP2, EP3, EPL1, EPL1s, EPL2, EPL3, EPM1, E600, E620,E5. All use the same sensor and pretty much have the same IQ. Different form factors but we don't even have that really in three models of OMD.

If someone can slam Canon for reusing the 18 MP sensor in many bodies then we should be critical of Olympus as well.

Now Fuji - thats exciting! They are moving the bar forward fast. And say what you want about Sony but clearly they are moving quicker as well.

I don't see panasonic or samsung beating the olympus in terms of IQ, its more like a match and that was panasonic playing catchup since the EM5 was launch before the GX7 or GM1. Are you just comparing them on paper? On paper every new release is better than the old but by how much? As for Fuji, granted their IQ has the edge, they're also playing catchup in terms of functions and features to EM1 and you gotta pay more to get that.

Link | Posted on Jan 30, 2014 at 00:36 UTC
Total: 196, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »