-
Well i recently bought an R5 with the 28-70 f2 and rf 70-200 2.8. I take both during hikes or small excursions. Hope to use them soon in travelling For both i would say the 28-70. It is rather ...
-
A slight update i just thought of something. When we finally travel i dont want to have to take everything out of the bag exposing thousands of equipment to the public. That ruins peak design for ...
-
I dont know if it is you on the video but i have watched that again!! Great content
-
I will check it out! Thank you very much
-
You are talking about the 20L right? Does it come with a raincoat? And how large laptop can it fit? I have a 15 inch macbook pro.
-
Hello everyone! I recently purchased the RF 28-70. Along with it i own an R5 and a RF 70-200 2.8. My old backpack completely gave up after about 7 years of use. I am looking for a travel friendly ...
-
I really hope you achieve it. It is an incredivle camera and the lenses are unbelievable. I am on a honeymoon period and i am a bit biased because i always loved canon but it is true. I too bought ...
-
I made the same decision the other day!! :-P I get your point!! I have mine ordered and wait to be delivered. I am not bothered of the weight. A friend of mine uses uwa for his photography so i ...
-
Thank you so much for your response! Although i love the usability and cost of the 24-105 i would like a faster lens to use it for a bit of portraiture as well. I have saved enough for every lens ...
-
First of all i love the quote in your signature. Its something we Greeks say often! Second. Weight is not an issue for me either when travelling. I am trying to keep my camera equipment below 4 ...
-
Hahaha to be honest it costs about 3150 dollars if you do the math. So if i could i would buy the lens from the US and still be cheaper. But probably i wouldnt have the insurance of canon here in ...
-
That would be a lot of lenses during travel. I dont like swapping lenses when out and about. I am a clumsy person and i can definitely drop a lens. I know i could leave the 24-105 all day long and ...
-
I get your point. Most of the time i dont use the 70-200 in the city. Mostly because i am more interested in documenting life. But i do use it when i want on a landmark in the distance and want to ...
-
Oh ok. Now i get it! Thank you very much
-
Could you elaborate on what you mean by "what i need varies with where i am"? I would love to hear your logic behind it. When i travel is mostly with friends or family. None of them are interested ...
-
To be honest i have no idea how the 28-70 feels on the body...if it is mostly balanced or front heavy. I have also heard that the 24-70 is more of a clinical lens. Sharp and nice but very clinical. ...
-
When you say kicked out of places? Ok i get it for countries like Turkey where they might think of you as a reporter and you may get in trouble. But in places like Cuba and Berlin, i dont think it ...
-
I already own the 70-200 and it has spoiled me against superzooms hahaha. But it is a fine recommendation!! Here in Greece depraciation is non exiatent in photography gear. We get a pretty good ...
-
Weight doesnt concern me as much as image quality and size. What i mean. Everyone in reviews says that the 28-70 has a prime like or actual prime rendering. Sharp nice colours and has a nice ...
-
Thank you for your reply! I have the same opinion that it is heavy. My main concern though is that it is noticeable. I attracts attention which sometimes may be unwanted especially during ...
Activity older than 12 months is not displayed.
|
Total messages |
26 |
Threads started |
3 |
Last post |
1 month ago |
|