Timmbits

I understand. I am referring to the timing of the reviews.
and we don't know for sure if they are shipping demos or not.
it happens often that they receive a pre-production model for a review,...

this happens often...
it makes you wonder, if the timing of these roundups is not a coincidence, but tied to advertising funds from certain manufacturers. amazon gets coop dollars and kickbacks...

Nope, not talking about those other models.
talking more about this one in particular.

I guess this comparison would be pointless, if you had included the new Nikon models in the evals.

it's the sensor, not the processor, I would say.
processor is just speed, and it's nothing without the firmware.
...and the wonderful quality Nikon glass.

@ardenclark56,
if you are complaining about lens prices,
your best option might be a used camera.
I've seen some used FF cameras going for pretty cheap these days,
you can keep your eyes peeled...

Really?
It is called GX7 in Japan, but replaces an older GX7 here... I thought up until now there was a lot of retardation in nomenclature, but this sets a new standard in stupidity.
They could...

@Mile FL: hopefully we won't be seeing any 1/23" anymore, ever. If cellphones have caught up with them, then they just don't have their place anymore.

Fuji is still paranoid about cannibalizing IL camera sales if they came out with an x100 version with a zoom.

Daniel, I think your friends' phones might have the image marred by the plastic casings and ziplock bags. you can count the number of waterproof smartphones out there on half a hand. so you and I...

H:
ok, you're not a Sony fan, and neither am I. I was referring to a 1" sensor and a better lens. underwater version. why are you against that? how can you be against that?

is TZ is travel zoom, what is ZS? zippy sport? ;p

Wonderful!

A step in the right direction.

I will wait for the version with the f1.7 lens.

it is a "small-ish" sensor after all - not to criticize - but it's not like you're getting a 2.8 on...

I purchased an underwater camera like this a few years ago. When the Panasonic and Sony were tied for first place, in a review on here that made them look brilliant. I paid for top pick figuring I...

please look at your pictures on a screen, and come back and tell us how you feel the pictures are.
looking at them on your camera harms the credibility of your assessment.
I agree with all you...

I guess Casio is learning a lesson... if you don't make "real" cameras for long enough you might end up making a profit one day.
They got lucky. Not sure if they'll write their new business plan...

not really. I take way more shots on digital than I ever dared take on film. so it doesn't really compare.
it's all just fictitious "value". hardly anyone makes a mono, so it's not like there will...

with an already very ordinary iq, I would worry that with add-ons, it can only get worse, not better. I do agree that it should do something out of the box, for this reason.

Am I the only one to think that there really should be a Sony RX100uw model?

Don, I had a Fuji for a while. But I don't speak of personal results here, because they can be skewed and not done against a test group. As you could have read, I was referring to TESTS done BY...