sebulban

Joined on Dec 23, 2018

Comments

Total: 10, showing: 1 – 10
In reply to:

Kelvin_Woooo: I think it is good to have such lawsuit as it could happen on any model of camera and anyone who take photography as their job or hobby. It is because no matter how this case result in, it will remind camera makers to make sure their claims is accountable and offer a better solution when the product fails to meet their claims.

In addition, I think it is common for something to fail quicker than someone would have expected when it is made in China. As it is commonly know that China is a place that provides cheap labour for factories. I personally don't think they would do their best when they are usually paid with minimum wage. Hence when something is pricing above $1000, I personally would avoid made in China product as much as possible.

Are you serious? Most of the modern consumer electronics are made in china.
Like smartphones and such the production lines are almost 100% automated and use exactly the same machines no matter if the production line stands in Brazil, US or China.

Link | Posted on Apr 7, 2021 at 08:22 UTC
In reply to:

Bjoern Wunderlich: Very good IQ. Low element count. Great for B&W. Small. Good.

Bad image quality for its price, slow for its price, badly handles LoCA, onion ring bokeh with crazy color fringing.

Link | Posted on Mar 23, 2021 at 23:46 UTC
On article Sony a1 initial review (1360 comments in total)

Wow. Surprised to see that the Nikon Z7II IQ is so much better on high ISO's or when shadows are really pushed.

Link | Posted on Mar 22, 2021 at 13:39 UTC as 22nd comment
In reply to:

lawny13: Haha... People really do tend to be harsher on canon compared to sony.

This thing will cost €7k+ here in Europe. People where saying that the R5 at €4.5k was way to much. I am not sure a 5 MP increase, and 30 fps justifies a near 50% more in price.

And then their claim of "To do this, Sony says it achieves a combination of resolution and speed that have previously seemed mutually exclusive". Well they didn't achieve something that seemed mutually exclusive. Canon already showed us with the R5 that it is not.

Marketing aside... its always good to have the two biggest manufacturers competing. Curious to know where they will end up. But I for one am not spending over €5k for a camera body.

Having a laptop with you on a sports event might not be that practical :)
Just imagine those 200 shooters all with laptops :)

Small 6MP jpgs & wifi would be more obvious for liv event shooting

Link | Posted on Feb 1, 2021 at 06:20 UTC
In reply to:

Razor512: Their proposed $6500 price tag makes it $500 more expensive than the 102 megapixel Fujifilm GFX 100s medium format camera.

Actually it's over 9k USD $ with the taxes, in Europe. At least in Finland

Link | Posted on Jan 28, 2021 at 12:06 UTC
In reply to:

lawny13: Haha... People really do tend to be harsher on canon compared to sony.

This thing will cost €7k+ here in Europe. People where saying that the R5 at €4.5k was way to much. I am not sure a 5 MP increase, and 30 fps justifies a near 50% more in price.

And then their claim of "To do this, Sony says it achieves a combination of resolution and speed that have previously seemed mutually exclusive". Well they didn't achieve something that seemed mutually exclusive. Canon already showed us with the R5 that it is not.

Marketing aside... its always good to have the two biggest manufacturers competing. Curious to know where they will end up. But I for one am not spending over €5k for a camera body.

Where would you hook up that usb on a large football stadium?
Assuming you need to deliver the images fast on an action sport event of any kind.

The wifi will be used mostly on jpg's and with low quality as the bandwidth is so limited on big stages.

The only connection that can sustain good speed for raw in a distance is ethernet.

Link | Posted on Jan 28, 2021 at 11:54 UTC
On article Panasonic Lumix DC-S1 review (1971 comments in total)
In reply to:

sebulban: Hold on... the body weights over 1kg ?

I just think it’s a bit too much. Especially with these new lenses..
S1 + 50mm is more than a d850 and 50mm 1.4 sigma art.

Great choice for many but not for myself as I like to go out with something (relatively)small that can fit easily in my small backpack

Link | Posted on Feb 2, 2019 at 07:18 UTC
In reply to:

Cam Eralens: Completely agree. Not a homerun, but a grand slam.
If you want to shoot video and also want a great still camera, there is nothing that can complete with this.

How do you know? I think that actually they care a lot. There hasn’t been any real choices in the past though.
There is no business area in the world where expenses doesn’t matter

Link | Posted on Feb 2, 2019 at 07:13 UTC
In reply to:

Cam Eralens: Completely agree. Not a homerun, but a grand slam.
If you want to shoot video and also want a great still camera, there is nothing that can complete with this.

Yep. It’s too expensive, big and heavy.

Link | Posted on Feb 1, 2019 at 23:55 UTC
On article Panasonic Lumix DC-S1 review (1971 comments in total)

Hold on... the body weights over 1kg ?

Link | Posted on Feb 1, 2019 at 14:55 UTC as 344th comment | 2 replies
Total: 10, showing: 1 – 10