Varuas

pretty dumb in general. Their AF algorithm is “if it has sharp edges” or “if it moves in front”, forget about the human face and jump around.

His switch was sponsored by that company, so it would be foolish to think he would lose anything in that deal. Plus the sponsorship/plugging of that company must mean he was well compensated on ...

It does not sound like a trivial drawback.

If you need the audio for some reason, go with 120p and slow down in post. Also, 120p is at 144Mbps while 30px4 is at 36Mbps, fwiw. If x4 or x5 did 144Mbps, I would see benefits, but that is not ...

He did not "lose out" at all, because his "switch" was sponsored by the user camera seller company. If you can find a company to pay for your "switch" by buying your gear with top dollars PLUS ...

To be fair, you only switched after Olympus went bust. True loyalty.

We only care if you sell all of your Nikon gear and then buy right back into Nikon, all within 6 months.

He switched to promote the used gear selling company, so it was just for marketing.

Nt

Not really. Stills clients cannot tell a difference between shots from 11 year old D3x versus Z6. The 11 year old D3s can hold up against any sporting event and clients wouldn’t know. But not so ...

Most people that reply to this thread do not realize that it is an ancient dead thread. Necro bumping.

D850 records 8bit internally and externally. Using external recording, they record uncompressed via hdmi. But still 8bit.

I am not a real photographer, so I use whatever convenient tool I need and can afford to capture moments. I was organizing my Nikon dslr and mirrorless photos since 2016 and I had shot around ...

I have kept my D600 as a backup to my Z6. D600 was originally purchased in 2012(within a month of release) and it underwent the shutter replacement due to oily sensor(apparent at f/8 and narrower ...

My off brand Tamrons and Sigmas have “Made in Japan” plastered, while Nikons I have are made in China/Thailand.

Look at the most "liked" post of this whole entire thread. It is asking to REMOVE video altogether. And, based on that poster's equipment list, an Olympus shooter fwiw: ...

Although you asked for the sharpness, which I think is just fine, I would like to offer a small critique, so hopefully mine is a bit constructive. I mean no harm. Overall, I really like this photo ...

Nikon does not have the prestige factor to remove essential features and to raise prices. They "can" try, however. They might corner the "stills only" folks who are sick of video features.

I agree that retaining higher resolution PDAF data in the raw file would be very useful. Canon users seem to benefit from it.

Wow, I had not thought of that. I have, twice, tried to mount my F lens into the Z mount and it bounced off the sensor. Woops! I didn't even think of the potential damage had it been the shutter.