Scott Birch

Joined on Sep 20, 2012


Total: 100, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Another Hasselblad rebadge or Photoshopped hoax? (185 comments in total)

Would the real one be fake? How real would the fake one be? We may never care.

Link | Posted on Oct 18, 2013 at 16:53 UTC as 49th comment
In reply to:

supeyugin1: $350 for a converter? They are crazy!
I've bought my Samsung NX100 with 20-50 and 20/2.8 (30mm equiv.) and a flash for $450 brand new. I later sold the flash for $70, so that's $380 for the camera with 2 lenses. And those jerks from Fuji are charging $350 just for one bloody converter?!

supeyugin if all your photos end up on social media sites or remain on some hard drive until accidentally deleted, then your NX200 is fine for you.

Link | Posted on Oct 18, 2013 at 16:15 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-M1 Review (230 comments in total)

Why's the dynamic range lower than the other models? Lower than quite a few mirrorless cameras, in fact.

Link | Posted on Oct 12, 2013 at 12:24 UTC as 25th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

Mattoid: If you are going to delete 'trolling' comments then you are against free speech and you may as well not have comments.

Not so. This site is private and speech is therefore not free. Are people free to yell whatever obscenities they choose at you in your own space, Mattoid?

Link | Posted on Aug 26, 2013 at 13:40 UTC

I like comments because the occasional one can be useful; even some of the very rude ones. Some of them can even be funny.

Link | Posted on Aug 26, 2013 at 13:25 UTC as 93rd comment | 1 reply
On article Gorgeous color photos of America in the 1930's and 40's (109 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mikhail Tal: What's so gorgeous about these photos? They aren't nearly as vibrant, sharp, and contrasty as modern digital photos. They look just as dated as anything else from a bygone ear. Film is dead.

Some people just don't like bygone ears.

Link | Posted on Aug 19, 2013 at 07:00 UTC
On article Panasonic GX7 First Impressions Review (1199 comments in total)
In reply to:

Timmbits: @DPR: I'm glad to see that you shot these with some other cameras for reference. however, you should add a few more in there, especially a wider selection of the higher-resolution cameras from Sony, Nikon, Samsung, Pentax, to keep the readership here happy... the best of each maker for reference in both APS and FF formats.

Some of us are aware of the scope of your effort. Thank you Barney. That said, may we have the moon on a stick?

Link | Posted on Aug 15, 2013 at 09:23 UTC
On article Olympus stems losses but PEN sales disappoint (233 comments in total)

Such a pity ..

Link | Posted on Aug 10, 2013 at 04:54 UTC as 38th comment
In reply to:

Funduro: Blue dot looks like a Nikon D600 oil/dust issue.

It's a bit contrasty. They should have looked at the jpeg settings on the older MFT model they're obviously using.

Link | Posted on Jul 25, 2013 at 08:55 UTC
In reply to:

Lelle Kidd: No one seems to react to the fact that the focus outline in "focus peaking" will be white! It should be in a contrasting color, such as RED.

Broadcast video graphers have worked with white/zebra focus peaking for years. I find your contrasting colour requirement a little unnecessary. Just my opinion, of course, but I don't think Fuji needs to change it.

Link | Posted on Jul 21, 2013 at 14:19 UTC
In reply to:

Artistico: When I saw the headline I was expecting a bullet time effect, but this is not it. Rather it is a camera spinning rig with a slightly higher frame rate and a guy trying really hard to start a forest fire over and over again with different fireworks. Could easily be $100 in costs and $1,000,000,000 in damages if he succeeds.

Anyway, wouldn't it technically be really cheap to create a real bullet time effect with old - and therefore cheap - cameras and a not very high-tech way of triggering them at the same time or with a slight delay?

It doesn't matter if he gets out much or not. He's right.

Link | Posted on Jul 2, 2013 at 20:58 UTC
In reply to:

jkokich: I applaud anyone who uses their imagination and ingenuity to do things Hollywood wastes millions on, but come on, this is merely a rotating camera rig. A very well-made one, for virtually no money, but not bullet-time.

Bullet time is simultaneous or almost simultaneous exposures from a series of cameras, not just one. This is just rotated slow-mo.

Link | Posted on Jul 2, 2013 at 20:58 UTC
On article Buyers' Guide: Best DSLRs and ILCs for under $1000 (88 comments in total)

Are these forums a good idea? So much whingeing from people who probably don't take photographs regularly. It's getting worse.

Link | Posted on Jul 1, 2013 at 08:40 UTC as 16th comment | 1 reply
On article Best DSLRs and ILCs for less than $1000 (271 comments in total)
In reply to:

Nikonworks: Most retailers hold a straight forward 'Inventory Sale', of which this article clearly seems to be, except the straight forward part.

DPReview please take notice:
When I was a kid 'slot cars' were the newest and 'biggest' thing.
Stores opened up just with slot car race tracks. It was fantastic but very short lived because the market place became overloaded with slot cars and accessories to the point the kids could not keep up with the market.
The whole market folded like a deck of cards.

Of late, you, the editors are doing the same thing here at DPReview.
You have too many Final Reviews to post before listing 'Old cameras under $1000'. You are reaching in all directions, phones, tech, cameras, etc.
You are making this site unwieldly and soon ambiguous.

You better get together and focus on your mission.

At the same time you can discuss formally thanking me for my 'Real World Samples' suggestion.

Nikonworks I suggest you set up your own site if you don't like this one. But I'm not holding my breath.

Link | Posted on Jun 30, 2013 at 10:41 UTC
On article Just posted: Our Fujifilm X-M1 hands-on preview (117 comments in total)

It's great. The other models in the X- range have viewfinders if you need one that badly. Stop whining.

Link | Posted on Jun 26, 2013 at 08:20 UTC as 15th comment

Finally. The camera for me. Now I don't have to wait for the Fuji XE-2 ;)

Link | Posted on May 31, 2013 at 21:21 UTC as 15th comment

Head-to-heads are really useful. Thank you.

Link | Posted on May 29, 2013 at 12:54 UTC as 46th comment
On article Just Posted: Olympus E-PM2 Review (161 comments in total)
In reply to:

ARTASHES: Cons: "OM-D image quality in smaller, lighter, cheaper body"
I think this is the biggest of pros of this camera ;)

HI Barney, thank you for your patient handling of all us high-maintenance trolls down here in Commentistan :)

Link | Posted on May 22, 2013 at 13:43 UTC
In reply to:

SeeRoy: Wotta lotta twaddle here - the usual endless piffle about FL/Aperture equivalence. I don't use a Nikon 1 system (I own FX and M4/3) however I did buy, and have used, a V1 system for a woman friend as an alternative to her Canon DSLR. And I wouldn't be likely to buy this overpriced lens even if I was a CX system user.
I agree that the existing cameras fall well short of what they might easily have been; many people might have been prepared to overlook the limitations imposed by the choice of sensor size had the ergonomics been better. However I feel it's likely that, given the rapid development in sensor technology, before too long we'll see a Nikon CX range that meets the requirements of many of its current critics.
There's a lot wrong with my OMD too but it doesn't stop me finding it a much more enjoyable experience than an FX body with a 2.8 zoom attached.
Edited for typo.

Guess I misunderstood this, perhaps?

Link | Posted on May 17, 2013 at 01:11 UTC
In reply to:

Scott Birch: Larger pixels would be much better for light-gathering than wider apertures. Imagine how high an ISO you could get away with on a 5Mp 1" sensor. Or a 5Mp FF sensor, for that matter.

I saw this and got excited:

Link | Posted on May 17, 2013 at 01:11 UTC
Total: 100, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »