Michael_13

Lives in Germany Germany
Joined on Mar 21, 2011

Comments

Total: 533, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On a photo in the Google Pixel 3 sample gallery sample gallery (2 comments in total)
In reply to:

UncoyDP: Horrid digital look. What an awful representation of skin.

I think this background is a real challenge for any camera's white balance.

Link | Posted on Oct 22, 2018 at 10:41 UTC
On a photo in the Google Pixel 3 sample gallery sample gallery (1 comment in total)

Nice HDR. Want this in my "real" camera.

Link | Posted on Oct 22, 2018 at 10:40 UTC as 1st comment
On a photo in the Google Pixel 3 sample gallery sample gallery (5 comments in total)
In reply to:

SmilerGrogan: What is Tony Stark doing in Seattle?

Yes, I first thought he was wearing something around his neck. ;-)

Link | Posted on Oct 22, 2018 at 10:40 UTC
On a photo in the Google Pixel 3 sample gallery sample gallery (3 comments in total)

This portrait mode for artificial low DOF is quite useless imo. You never know what will be missing.
In this case half of the dog's whiskers.

Link | Posted on Oct 22, 2018 at 10:38 UTC as 1st comment
On a photo in the Google Pixel 3 sample gallery sample gallery (4 comments in total)
In reply to:

Vit Adamek: Hmm, no offence if it is like that really but the left hand looks properly deformed.

Laws of optics. All WA lenses do this.

Link | Posted on Oct 22, 2018 at 10:35 UTC
On a photo in the Google Pixel 3 sample gallery sample gallery (3 comments in total)
In reply to:

piccolbo: I am pixel-peeping but has anyone noticed the jagged edge of the woman's cheek? Is that compression? I mean on her left side against the bright background.

Yes, looks pretty bad, esp. in her hair, top right. It is visible full screen on a PC monitor without pixel peeping, Probably caused by the low-dof filter.

Link | Posted on Oct 22, 2018 at 10:34 UTC
On article Canon RF 35mm F1.8 Macro IS STM sample gallery (286 comments in total)
In reply to:

mxx: I like the images very much. And good shooting, except for a few angled horizons. And who leaves their peanut debris on the floor?

Funny, never heard of this. What's the point of doing so?
The noise it produces when walking over it?

Link | Posted on Oct 16, 2018 at 09:15 UTC
On article Canon RF 35mm F1.8 Macro IS STM sample gallery (286 comments in total)
In reply to:

joe_leads: The images look simply oversaturated to me. Is this the magic of the „Canon colors“, or the magic of the Adobe software engineers? I can’t say it’s very pleasant to look at for me.

They are quite saturated, yes. Be aware, though, that these pics are not OOC.
It is Adobe's & Dpreview's interpretation of the RAW files.

Besides, I am sure that the camera also offers a more natural setting. It is basically a matter of taste.

Link | Posted on Oct 16, 2018 at 09:13 UTC
In reply to:

wasTF: I did this over WLAN with my iPAD version 1 ! Its not usefull.

@wastf: I think, you misunderstood: This little stick does not only copy the main screen, but works as a second display.

I don't know of any solution that can do this with software alone.

Link | Posted on Oct 12, 2018 at 19:28 UTC
In reply to:

Josh Leavitt: I'd love to see this tech make its way into a micro four thirds body. I'll sell off my full-frame gear in a heartbeat if the Panny G9 or an Oly E-M1 II had optional settings for HDR+, computational RAW, synthetic fill-flash, learning portrait, and Night Sight.

Computational photography certainly won't be to every photographer's liking, as it removes a great deal of direct control from the final image. But a well executed implementation into a M43 body paired with the excellent Leica Vario and Olympus PRO series glass could easily surpass modern full-frame systems in dynamic range and detail, while being half the size, half the cost, and 1/3 the weight.

I've basically said the same in the forum and hope that Olympus listens.
This is the only way how their format can stay relevant.

It would be a shame to lose m43 only because management does not see the need for better software.

Link | Posted on Oct 11, 2018 at 15:33 UTC
In reply to:

bolt2014: Why?

Maybe.. because the designers are fed up with vertical videoclips.

Link | Posted on Oct 10, 2018 at 18:00 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-T3 First Impressions Review (1800 comments in total)
In reply to:

noisephotographer: Dpreview, your image quality section doesn't discuss one of the most important things in my opinion: The visible(without editing!) out-of-camera jpg dynamic range! The DR Modes aren't there just to be ignored by you!

Comparisons really are quite difficult because of different lenses, angles and RAW converters.I mostly use it for judging noise. For colors and sharpness it is not very useful, imo.
Still, the team surely puts a lot of effort in this and there simply isn't an easy way to provide perfectly comparable results over time(!).

I also think it would be useful to compare real life samples to a good smartphone. Camera manufacturers would take note, I hope, and come up with better software solutions for HDR, etc.

Link | Posted on Oct 8, 2018 at 21:20 UTC

Good use of a 3D printer, but the fun of doing it is sure larger than the actual usefulness of the result. Besides: I would choose a red filament to match the red Leica dot. ;-)

I don't remember exactly, but I think the film cameras I used, all had a little window on the back that showed the ISO.

Link | Posted on Oct 7, 2018 at 09:57 UTC as 28th comment | 1 reply
On article Instagram reaches 1 billion active users (90 comments in total)
In reply to:

GrapeJam: And I still have to transfer my photos to my phone or use an android simulator that is buggy and runs like **** every time I want to upload them to instagram.

Also, no full size vertical aspect photo uploading unless I use seperated crop app.

Why do you use it at all, when it is so bad?

Link | Posted on Oct 4, 2018 at 13:15 UTC
On article Sigma 40mm F1.4 Art beta sample gallery (207 comments in total)
In reply to:

RolliPoli: 'Fast' 'Sharp' 'Light'
You can have any two,
but never all three.

... unless you pick mFT. :-)

Link | Posted on Oct 3, 2018 at 11:46 UTC
In reply to:

AlexisH: This should be interesting. Is there really a market for honest, constructive, anonymous feedback? ;)

Not in the U.S. for sure... ;-)

Link | Posted on Oct 3, 2018 at 11:40 UTC

From blog.halide.cam:
Look how bad SmartHDR is (right) vs. edited RAW (left)
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/2000/1*xzjPdvTZK5fJ275MPj8auA.jpeg

Link | Posted on Oct 2, 2018 at 12:09 UTC as 7th comment | 1 reply

Not only skin texture & tones look wrong, but also shadows and darker areas in general.
Its HDR effect is complete rubbish. Just watch the video of the unboxing guy.

Link | Posted on Oct 2, 2018 at 11:35 UTC as 8th comment | 1 reply
On article What you need to know about the Fujifilm GFX 50R (246 comments in total)
In reply to:

virtualreality: It looks big and ugly. Probably it will be even worse in real life.

Have a few beers, before you use it...

Link | Posted on Oct 1, 2018 at 18:34 UTC
On article What you need to know about the Fujifilm GFX 50R (246 comments in total)
In reply to:

Trubbtele: I will wait to the GF 50mm F3.5 pancake lens shows up. Shuld be fun!

Will it fit into your coat pocket then?

Link | Posted on Oct 1, 2018 at 18:29 UTC
Total: 533, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »