nathaniel m

Lives in United States MD, United States
Works as a Student
Has a website at
Joined on May 14, 2010
About me:

Canon EOS 7D + 50/1.4 + 17-55/2.8 + 70-200 IS II
Get an M9 as soon as I can afford it. It's perfect for my non-sports shooting.


Total: 4, showing: 1 – 4

So a NEX-5R (or N) is cheaper, smaller, larger sensor, and has a greater lens selection. For those who would say no viewfinder, use the savings to add the removable one.

I see zero reason to buy this. Ever.

Link | Posted on Oct 25, 2012 at 18:48 UTC as 19th comment

A thinner, far cheaper (≤$4000) Leica M with the option for autofocus lenses, better battery life, quicker burst (4fps is all), larger buffer (8 is all), and gps built in (without the grip).

Another way of looking at it is a Sony NEX7 with a full frame sensor and smaller, higher quality, full manual lens options. Also, an innovation for quick accurate manual focus (as it is unlikely that sony would add a rangefinder mechanism, and focus peaking isn't fast).

All the other stuff (video, lack of AA, fancy color filter matrix, mpix, iso noise, etc.) is already so good, that I can't imagine needing more improvement

These two descriptions are the same camera. I think I won't have to wait long. This seems to be on its way. Cant wait!!!

Link | Posted on Oct 20, 2012 at 01:32 UTC as 415th comment

I find them refreshing and original. They seem to show more of the fun and grit of sports than the typical "all glory" shot.

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2012 at 21:22 UTC as 77th comment | 2 replies

I'd love it if they came out with a serious M9 competitor. That's luxury and would fit cleanly above the X100

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2011 at 01:13 UTC as 21st comment | 1 reply
Total: 4, showing: 1 – 4