riveredger

Same here. If they release a GR3x in this edition, I might go for it

Sure

The same was said for 4k and 1080p before that.

You'll here the same cranky comments from the same cranky people who have been posting here for the past decade+. One could easily come away with the perception that all photographers are pompous ...

Please. It's same thing with everything in the tech world. What is "good enough" for you may not be for someone else.  It's not a scam for companies to produce new products.

Fantastic piece!

Not sure if you are supporting my statement or opposing it?

Security updates can be critical if one uses a smartphone for tasks like payments, banking or other uses that require personal and private information.

I think there will be demand for photos, but I don't think the mechanism to create them is predictable.

Lol, indeed. But if it goes the way of the CX mount, we may have some angry folks...

Francis, while you are correct, businesses have a hard time investing more in R&D without any ROIC.

Not a good investment if the mounts continue to change!

I think the GR could be improved but adding a built in viewfinder and snappy dual pixel type AF.

Not sure Ricoh is looking for advancements in computational features in these models. Where do you get that idea?

But then you are using different exposures (twice the shutter speed).

Hmm. Lots of assumptions in this post.

Lol, I wasn't the one who claimed it "punches beyond its weight". I think it is a good camera that covers a specific use case very well, but I do not see it exceeding expectations.

I don't think that is over delivery, though. It is expected output from a large sensor and prime lens combination.

I don't think it over-delivers. I actually think it's a very limited camera due to its fixed lens, slow AF and outdated video specs. The IQ is excellent, however.

@merida no