SUPER-ELMAR

I have opposite impression.  RF 24-105 really soft on R6.  Not something I would recommend.  Even Panasonic 24-105 is sharper and it's not as sharp as the Sony version.  Maybe you have bad 12-60 ...

What is the problem with 12-bit? https://www.photonstophotos.net/Charts/PDR_D850.htm#Nikon%20D850(12),Nikon%20D850(14) You could make millions publishing instructional on avoiding dust spots with ...

https://www.photonstophotos.net/Charts/PDR_HighResShotMode.htm#Olympus%20OM-D%20E-M1X,Olympus%20OM-D%20E-M1X(HR),Olympus%20OM-D%20E-M1X(HHHR)

To the contrary, DR is very high. Higher than many full frame cameras. Similar to the X1D.  Artifacts can occur in any image - also hot pixels, dust spots, false patterns. Fingerpaint said no ...

That is perfect time for high-res.  3 stop increase in total light with more resolution and pixel accurate color.  This can be done on little Em5.3 which costs 1/3 of Z7ii price in HK.

Explain how my former D5 and 80-400 is "brighter" than current EM1X and 40-150 at 300mm angle view. Olympus much easier to focus in dark places. Which means FF "realistically tops out" at 6400?? ...

Comrade Sony is spamming tiny sensor forum with condescending tone all week.  Don't take it personal.  Always enjoy your wildlife shots.  Thank you for sharing these.

It seems many here already have it. "I Own It" among recent sports wildlife bodies Nikon D6: 37 Canon 1DX III: 69 EM1-X: 193 Sony A9II: 97 I came from D5 and was astonished at how capable the EM1-X ...

Not only outlier but drastically different angle of view. Perhaps you meant 500mm 5.6?? (1) Z7ii + FTZ + 500/5.6 = $6850, 2460g (2) EM1mkiii + 300/4 = $4500, 2055g

Splendid detail in those images Paul.  Lovely set of photographs.

I leverage Instagram for networking.  I don't post my best there as TOU dictates lose ownership.  Social are good tools for connectivity but an indirect business driver for company.

My guess was "G". There is 1 in 12 chance of guessing correctly. At time you posted the answer 7 of 56 members chose the correct response...which equates to 1 in 12. So no better than a guess. Ther ...

Sorry to hear this.  I suspect it is done for.  Salt water is terribly corrosive inside a body.

This is the part I struggle with.  On 50MP full sensor I would expect more.  I do not think it is the sensor but the lens.  Here in HK the Olympus 300mm is same cost as Sony 200-600 but 2x the ...

Focus looks behind the birds head - does it miss a lot? This seems more like quality I expect from Olympus 100-400mm. Wonder how these compare to Panasonic 200mm or Olympus 300mm in terms of ...

Only appear in manual focus

On day one similar but not over time. I too looked at A1 + 200-600. A1 + 200-600 = 2.8kg 8500 USD mk3 + 150-400 = 2.4kg 9100 USD I try and avoid cheap lens with high end camera. Spend money on ...

Might want to read up on this combination - there are many reports of poor performance with this camera and lens. Question Detail (sony.com)

Not magic, just science. More light gathering with high res and hand held high res. I thought we compare the image that comes out of each camera? If image quality is the goal, the Olympus image TT ...

Or an actual rangefinder instead of posers.