Xasan

You can call it whatever you want. Reality is that your idea of what exposure is is wrong. Look up the definition. Doesn't do you any good to mistake exposure for what it isn't. Oh, I do understand ...

Not me. Mother Nature says so.

No, you are kidding yourself. The print can replicate something, or a show on a display, not exposure. Again, only kidding yourself here. No answer, as fully expected. No understanding of the ...

Exposure doesn't have any look. What you guys are saying is akin to "I like how 240 VAC look".

They can't tell a photographer what is correct exposure. ISO standards are technical standards. ISO operates with the terms like nominal exposure, speed, that kind of technicalities. Your attempt ...

I wouldn't expect expect anything but exposure or log exposure on "X".

https://web.archive.org/web/20140720233757/http://image.eastmanhouse.org/files/GEH_1954_03_05.pdf L. A. JONES AND HIS WORK ON PHOTOGRAPHIC SENSITOMETRY By C. E. Kenneth Mees

You have comprehension issues.

Not entirely true. Lenses for many super-zoom cameras by design are not providing the full sensor coverage at the short end, so cropping does take place. Have a look at raw files from JK Imaging, ...

And you are saying this why? Is it because this forum doesn't support your views more than half the time and you are looking to proclaim it a vanity fair to protect your sensitive ego?

It is also different from saying that those who can see are cheating.

Yeah, yeah... trolling, dishonest, misleading, cheating, retina, anything else? You can't see PDAF pattern that is in plain site, on a 185 ppi ColorEdge CG248-4K I have at home, at 50% view, which ...

N.T.

Stop that please. Several people already told you that you are wrong. It is plain visible at 100% on a basic monitor.

Deserves a bump.

Look at DSC06795.jpg in an image editor. The artifacts are 1 pixel rows, slightly propagated because of debayer and JPEG compression. Can you show anything similar with 2x or 3x enlargements?

OK, explain how a non-retina MacBook is affected by all the "retina-aware" stuff you were trumpeting. Explain how you missed the clear indication I'm using a non-retina MacBook and continued with ...

It contains the answer :-D It was given to you to explain that your "retina-aware" stuff is totally irrelevant. The answer was given long ago in that post above. You are wasting my time. No, this ...

You need all the help you can get, really. https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/61100834

That's what you are doing :-D You are either being dishonest or delusional. Maybe both. Drop the retina issue already :-D I told you repeatedly I'm looking at non-retina monitor. No it doesn't. Thi ...