JeremieB

Beautiful photo, one that provokes feelings and emotions. Thanks for sharing.

Thanks, maybe I just forgot they did that. Yes, I confirm that the statement is about IBIS accuracy. Without thinking I thought they were right, thanks for the fact checking ! Isn't it even more ...

I trust them more for other kinds of equipments (like TVs) but the review is interesting. They often were not very nice with previous models ... For FPS I'm sure they didn't see the difference ...

Be careful, there's SDM and there's ring type SDM, both extremes (ring type being the best, old SDMs the worst). A good summary from Alex Sarbu: https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/65033285 There ...

Yes. I guess K70 was supposed to make the PLM sell like pancakes, but in the end I wonder if the K3III didn't play this role more efficiently... If this forum is an indication of anything, it seems ...

A lover should be photographed with candle light, instead of agressive flash ruining the mood ;-) "My dear ... - !!!FLASH!!!" That doesn't work as you can see in this simulation. More seriously ...

If I didn't already I would buy K3III, but now I have it I would get a DA* 300 + the 77 ltd, or probably I would wait to see how is the 16-55 PLM. Yes that's very different, but you give us only ...

Maybe you have exceptionally good copies from Sigma and particularly bad copies from Pentax ? Owning both FA 50 and the Sigma 18-35, I notice the complete opposite of what you say. I used the FA 50 ...

Because K-70, 70 is 7 followed by 0. The other APS-C is K3 mark III. 3 is the number of flagshipness, love, and luck. 3 x 7 = 21 ==> DFA 21mm Ltd Here's the link. Don't thank me, I don't deserve it :-D

That's what everyone says about Pentax users, but then it's also because users interested in video go elsewhere. So yes, remaining ones probably don't care about video, which may also mean that ...

GPS is lacking, not astrotracer. I still think the main issue is that every Pentax user wants to want this camera, because it's a new release after quite some time. Truth is that it's probably not ...

Nobody cares about the shutter speeds for a studio scene. People use the tool to compare output at different ISO levels. Unless DPR does all combinations of ISO x shutter speed x aperture ? Anyway ...

Thanks ! I've set it as phone background in portrait, but I think you're right about landscape out of this specific use case.

It was building its web, I saved it from my neighbour who wanted to spray it with insecticide. Made me wonder if my neighbour frequently sprays insecticide in my garden ? I used the Laowa twin ...

This is Bluetooth Low Energy in K3III.

I guess I had a bad idea ;-) But it wouldn't be a specific thread, more a DPR forum feature: IF you upload RAW files, THEN they are added to the bank of samples and become searchable. Saying that I ...

I think they will just say your name during a live session, if they use one of your questions.

It's a comparison tool, done in "lab", following some protocol. The basics of science is to read and criticize what has been published, so it gets better, and is approved by a community. I really ...

I think you defend something impossible to defend, sorry. What the masses will notice is that at base ISO output from K3III is worse than any other camera, period. Which is wrong and misleading. An ...

Of course it's possible, they even provided a possible temporary workaround themselves: extract a frame from a pixel shift shot to use ES. But a casual user opening the comparison tool and ...