mount evans

Could someone please remind me how to post a picture such that ISO, f-number, etc. are annotated accordingly?  I can link to my Flickr account that has all that stuff.

I have my suspicions, mainly have to do with things that should be vertical not being parallel to the sides of the frame...but I realize there are other reasons for that.  Sometimes things that ...

"Precious" Our adopted cat has a tendency not to face the camera, and an ability to defeat autofocus.

I have never calibrated the level sensor on either of my OM-D cameras.  Should I?  I have some friends with machine shops that would have level surfaces I could use, but that is no help for ...

That's dreadful, if true.  Details, please?

You have made me very happy. Was the OM1 supposed to have the new BSI sensor, or did that come along earlier?

I second the reccommendation of IrfanView.  It is not only handy for resizing (your choice of algorithm), but also changing format, JPEG quality, color depth of PNGs and GIFs, etc,  most of which ...

Alaskan brown bears should always be photographed with as long a lens as possible.

I have always taken it as an article of faith that, for still photos, a "digital teleconverter" can't do anything that couldn't be done after the fact by post-processing a raw file. It's just ...

The human eye can allegedly resolve 576MP. The OM-1 sensor is 5164 pixels wide.  Printed at 200 DPI, you can get a 26 inch print from that.  Since people would have to stand back a bit from larger ...

Furthemore, if 80MP corresponds to a distance between "pixels" of 1.68um, you would need a lens with an f-number lower that 2.5 to get that sort of resolution, according to the Rayleigh Criterion. ...

For landscape and still life pictures such as these (OK, maybe not the bird) the OM1 and earlier Olympus cameras can take an 80MP picture. Whether the laws of physics support that resolution is ...

Are both images straight out of camera? Olympus cameras and lenses are not always supported by post-processing programs.

You definitely want to keep the Zuiko Digital 50mm f/2.  In addition to what others have recommended, I would suggest searching the used markets to bring the price down.

Fine, then, there are f/1.4 and f/1.8 primes of quite manageable size and price.  But then, I buy all my lenses "previously owned."

Need I point out that Olympus and other micro four thirds lensmakers offer some very fast, high quality glass?  f/1.2 if you insist on autofocus, lower if you can make do without.

The consensus seems to be that B + W Kaesemann CPLs are the best.  B&H doesn't seem to sell those in 62mm for some reason.  Curiously, they sell this for very close to the same price: B+W ...

It is unclear to me whether anyone was discussing the new Russian mirror lenses from Rubinar.  Here is a brief description, but I don't know if anyone has evaluated them: https://www.digitalcameraw ...

What is the quality of the Tokina 300mm f/6.3, and will an Olympus 2x teleconverter fit inside whatever it uses for a µ4/3 adapter?  I have been assuming that all recently made mirror lenses are ...

Was the banding in the photos, or just the EVF? If the former, did he have a Panasonic lens on the Olympus body?