shademaster

This is my point.  In principle, one could just put a speedbooster on the nikon 24-120 f/4 to make it a 12-60 f/2 and get what I want.  The nikon 24-120 f/4 is not ridiculously heavy (a pound and ...

I think it would be really great to put something equivalent to the canon 24-105 f/4 or nikon 24-120 f/4 on a μ4/3 camera.  What if the pany 12-60 f/4 was f/2 instead? What would people tolerate ...

if only canon made nicer aps-c lenses... sure, you can always crop a big boy, but you sure are dragging around a lot of extra glass for nothing then.

I think the EVF is the same as LX100. I see the tearing if I blink rapidly or move my eyeball rapidly, but it's not a big problem. (I haven't been spoiled by OVFs, so I'm easy to please).

For...

I've been thinking about the 12-60 (or the Oly 12-100). I don't think I'd need a GH5 and could get by with a GX85 (played with it in the store and it feels comfortable coming from my LX100). But...

Also: Dear Sigma,

Please make an APS-C equivalent of the Canon 24-105 f/4 (we know... it will be big and expensive) so that we can use it with the T7i, 80D, and/or M5/6 (adapted). IMHO, it's much...

Canon, here's me:

I have some Samsung NX bodies, lots of NX lenses.
I have the LX100 and love it. I rarely shoot with my NX anymore (it only comes out for "special portraits" with the NX 85mm)....

I would take the dpaf over the dr but c'mon. It's 2017. We should have BOTH.

cue the nikon fanboys...

Hi all, I just got back from a nice trip where I was shooting a lot of landscapes in 9:16 aspect ratio.  That made the most sense without thinking about making big prints.  Now when I look at ...

Cool.  I'll check them out.

Hi all, Anybody have a service for gallery wraps done at arbitrary aspect ratio?  I have a lot of landscape shots on my LX100 done at the 9x16 aspect ratio. Thanks!

@webber15, the darkroom called. They have your negatives ready.

"Some of us don't like banding and rolling shutter effect ;-)"

Just wait a couple of years for the electronics to catch up. It's only a matter of time.

"You could use the live view for almost a decade ". Not with reasonable autofocus.

so, they're charging $1100 for the 24-105L mk2?

The 6Dmk1 has a $500 price differential between body-only and 24-105 L mk1. Is the mk2 lens TWICE as good as the mk1?

just put in an evf, take out the mirror, and call it a day already...

the mirror is dead. watch out mechanical shutters. they're coming for you next.

Hard to compare apples to apples.  I think the FF DSLRs are overpriced for what they are, but the FF glass is affordable.  Mirrorless bodies (except GH5 and E-M1ii) are reasonable price but the ...

DPAF and sub $2200 price with 24-105L kit.  Sub $1800 body-only.  (Current model is $1400 body-only, $2000 with the 24-105L kit) Otherwise, the mirrorless options are still a much better deal for ...

I advise against the long zoom unless you specifically know you need it.  (e.g. if you take bird photos all the time or sports).  MOST of your shots will end up being in the 24mm-75mm equiv. range ...