Marcus Sundman

Actually I *was* surprised and astonished at how bad the R is, and I guess they will surprise and astonish me even more in the future with even more bad gear.

The sensor size, or crop factor, is the important thing, in addition to the aperture (which is also a useless number without knowing the cropfactor). It tells us what we can expect in terms of...

Franz, I also prefer them, but this is a HUGE criticism other video-oriented cameras are getting if they don't flip to facing the front. I would prefer a tilt screen that flips completely to the...

And the top LCD looking like a cheap digital watch from the 80s was also decided based on "detailed customer feedback". I hope it comes with a button to light up a tiny LED from the side, to make...

@ptox, C'mon, the rear screen isn't even connected, so it's obviously not a fully working prototype.

And they chose to not make the screen flip around to facing the front, which is one of the biggest, and widely praised, advantages they have over other cameras, presumably also because of "detailed...

"Panasonic tells us that every aspect of the camera was decided upon on the basis of detailed customer feedback"
So the lack of PDAF is because of "detailed customer feedback". How detailed can the...

Let's start from the beginning, without any past baggage, completely unchopped: So let's say the lens causes a circle of confusion in the center taking up 0.0001% of the picture that the FF sensor ...

I specifically started anew. Since you are refusing to reply on this completely new, unchopped message (sans your chopping away the actual questions), I can only conclude that you are purely trolling.

On the off chance that you are not just trolling, because I want to believe the best of people, let's start from the beginning, without any past baggage: So let's say the lens causes a circle of ...

Let's see if we can pinpoint the disagreement/misunderstanding, shall we? So let's say the lens causes a circle of confusion in the center taking up 0.0001% of the picture that the FF sensor ...

Assuming the smaller sensor has smaller or equal size pixels then most definitely yes. No matter how many times you say "no" it won't change facts. Nobody is arguing that. However, we are saying ...

Actually those two are the same thing, so they don't add up. But yes, it's exactly correct that the IQ drops as the sensor gets smaller using the same glass, assuming the glass isn't sharper than ...

People in English-speaking countries aren't that bright (which is also why they can't learn any other language, so everyone else has to adapt to their horribly antistructural language online). ...

That is indeed quite a nice all-arounder! At least on paper..

Indeed. So, is there some small and light APS-C superzoom for E? Or even a small wide zoom?

That's pure marketing spin. Lens IS can compensate x- and y-axis shifts more, but can't correct for z-rotation, so it's inherently worse from a qualitative perspective. The best is to combine lens ...

Tru dat. But it's not the only thing which matters. In fact, a lot of the time I'm highly unsatisfied by the high base ISO on MFT cameras. I really don't like switching systems, but I'm fine with ...

Actually you care about the T number only when choosing your ISO. If your ISO won't go low or high enough then you have to start compromising with shutter speed or aperture. Any which way that's ...

That's exactly the problem. I would love to have a slow zoom like that, but no company makes those. And what will that weigh? Twice as much as that 10x zoom? And with the camera? I guess as much as ...