h2k

Thanks, M.

"HAHAHAHA! Good one, Barney!"
--
Indeed.

No word on the weight?

Thanks Barney, now even i know!

Why not explain to the newbies what "Blue Ring" actually stands for? Not everyone is so market-savvy.

Maybe there rarely was less development on a next-gen model?

Would love to see if there is any iq difference between PL7 and PL8.

Nice headline, and interesting op-ed. I guess the disses from fanboys and paid clickers come w/ the territory.

I personally could do w/out phrases such as "hell" or "for heaven's sake".

Mister J, on that aspect i fully agree.

Sprout, thanks for an interesting aspect (which still doesn't fully convince me).

I still don't see why Canon - who once introduced me to side-hinging monitors - now applies vertically hinged monitors. Side-hinging gives you many more viewing angles including portrait orientation and "around the corner" with tricky terrain or sunlight angles - *plus* all the angles you could get with a vertically moving monitor.

A side-hinged monitor gives a much larger variety of comfortably reachable viewing angles, and i thought that's what photography is about.

Musicman, thanks for backgrounds (from which i gather that in Britain the first name only is used for most royals and by tabloids, but not by quality papers for anybody except royals minus Queen and maybe for Mrs Thatcher).

Barty, thanks for your explanation. I understand that "Ansel" almost sounds like a registered trademark, known to any discerning photographer, DPR reader etc.

Still i felt it sounds a bit "colloquial". Do you write "Barrack" or "Hillary" in newspaper headlines? (I don't mean private blog entries or any quick-and-dirty publication.)

I wonder if it's normal practice to bring only the first name in the headline ("Pre-Visualization: Ansel's views on what made his images so special").

I didn't grow up in Anglophone culture, so it might be just normal, still it had me wondering.

"Epson's AR glasses will let you see what your DJI drone sees"?
---
But this is nothing new, isn't it

Chris, thanks for your input.

The first two associations i had after reading the first lines of this newspiece:
- Interesting that it's a photographer and not an environmentalist or scientist who writes this complaint. (Aware that this here is a photographers' website.)
- Could and should the observer who filmed the vandals have intervened even at the risk of not being able to film them? (He might have become their next target.)

Harsh verdict, but certainly a fun phrase.

Thanks for letting us know.

I also don't know why Sony doesn't offer touch screens. I thought it would seem in line with their image and type of cameras. I am fully used to touch screens and find them gorgeous.

I've also said several times that i dislike the click-click-click format.

I was then told by readers that i could continue reading with the arrow keys instead of clicking on screen buttons. The arrow keys do make things a bit easier, but still on each new page again i have to scroll down to get to the text (and i have to re-concentrate).

And yes, i do "click" a few hundred times to write this reply, but i don't have to change page after page and re-concentrate to do so.

I still very much like most of DPRs content, and i (have to) accept anything here, but i will not read some of the content that's presented in click-click-click format which i might have read in a "longread" format.