Lives in United States MA, United States
Joined on May 21, 2008


Total: 39, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
In reply to:

AlanG: There's not much to go on in that video but the market would be well served by a smaller Phantom that folds up. (Phantom 5?) 1 inch camera sensor, etc. The current Phantom form factor is bulky and a folding version would sell without the need for many new features. It seems like a no-brainer that DJI would make that... now or soon.

Exactly what I'm wishing for.About to get my 1st drone.1" and all would be grrrreat!

Link | Posted on Jan 18, 2018 at 15:02 UTC

It was much more respected back in the day when it was called a self portrait.Autobiographies&referring to one's self by name require more study.😎🤡

Link | Posted on Dec 30, 2017 at 18:20 UTC as 46th comment

So ice counts as land?⛄️⛄️

Link | Posted on Dec 20, 2017 at 19:32 UTC as 4th comment
In reply to:

tnun: you might have said the store was in Calgary. Canada is a fairly big country. but then of course you would get remarks about the recent installation fraud and weird theories...

It's only big if you count the Yukon!

Link | Posted on Dec 18, 2017 at 20:33 UTC
On article How to buy used gear (and not get burned) (141 comments in total)

In my 3 purchases from KEH,I found them to underrate their gear+back it up completely.You often pay more but the peace of mind is included.BH very good as well.

Link | Posted on Aug 20, 2017 at 19:19 UTC as 52nd comment

And...I complain about getting up at 5AM for sunrise!

Link | Posted on Jul 10, 2017 at 04:48 UTC as 33rd comment
On article Ask the staff: electronic or optical viewfinder? (890 comments in total)

Ground glass is the best!

Link | Posted on Mar 14, 2017 at 02:01 UTC as 84th comment
On article Ask the staff: electronic or optical viewfinder? (890 comments in total)
In reply to:

Herkybird: Optical or electronic both are good enough to get the job done now days. How about, instead, a viewfinder that is actually made to be usable for people with glasses. The eyepoint on modern cameras is atrocious; my old Nikon D2H and F3HP were the only small format cameras that were just about perfect.

So agree on the F3 high eyepoint

Link | Posted on Mar 14, 2017 at 02:00 UTC

I like this lens.Click on the link below that I've written to end all discussion of equivalence.

Haha-no such link is possible.Carry on!

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2016 at 13:19 UTC as 11th comment | 1 reply
On photo At The Met in the Night time fountains challenge (15 comments in total)

Stunning capture!Congratulations.

Link | Posted on Jul 28, 2015 at 14:30 UTC as 2nd comment
On article Hands-on with new Olympus PRO 8mm and 7-14mm lenses (296 comments in total)
In reply to:

Roadtripper: " announced to new wideangle 'Pro' lenses"...good thing they didn't announce "for" new lenses, or especially "ate" new lenses...and this person gets paid to write these articles, but not to "right" them...

Lotta knuckleheads out there that have a strong need to be right about something/anything.Mr BB -Good righting and good writing.

Link | Posted on May 12, 2015 at 18:37 UTC
In reply to:

BeaverTerror: "We don’t consider that we manufacture more FX than DX lenses; we’ll focus on both." "We don’t feel we have more FX than DX products now; we have a full line-up in DX as well."

Stopped taking this interview seriously after the second answer. What a joke.

They're just not sure how many of each lens type they make.They're big picture guys,not numbers men.Heehee

Link | Posted on Apr 11, 2015 at 03:17 UTC
In reply to:

thx1138: What a lame interview from Nikon. They might have as well pleaded the fifth and refused to answer any questions. Learned nothing at all from them, other than they should become politicians. Compare the lack of detail coming from Canikon compared to others and they still have this air of superiority. We're too important to give you details, just wait and see what we release and be impressed.

Right on target.Add arrogant.

Link | Posted on Apr 11, 2015 at 03:14 UTC

Looks like a new art filter.Boring

Link | Posted on Mar 21, 2015 at 03:48 UTC as 22nd comment

If Roger's doing it,it will be fair and useful.He will make money and we will get choices.

Link | Posted on Oct 4, 2014 at 02:56 UTC as 16th comment
In reply to:

Deardorff: Anyone who posts images on facebook is an idiot.
Their terms of service say they can re-sell it and use it commercially (as well as your PERSONAL information) in any way they want. And YOU are the one legally liable if legal action is taken by someone.

Have you stopped posting on Facebook?

Link | Posted on Jul 28, 2014 at 03:38 UTC
In reply to:

offtheback: ....and some of my posts have several likes.

Made my day!

Link | Posted on Jul 28, 2014 at 03:37 UTC

....and some of my posts have several likes.

Link | Posted on Jul 27, 2014 at 15:18 UTC as 30th comment | 1 reply

I am above Reddit.I publish my "work"exclusively on Facebook.Full screen is the nuts.

Link | Posted on Jul 27, 2014 at 15:17 UTC as 31st comment

From a quick review of the comments,he may regret the photo being posted on DPREVIEW.

Link | Posted on Jul 27, 2014 at 13:55 UTC as 35th comment | 3 replies
Total: 39, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »