rz64

Lives in Germany Germany
Works as a Civil Engineer
Joined on Sep 15, 2013

rz64's recent activity

  • To my mind, equivalence has also something to do with the brightness of the lens. According to your writing, the RF lens turns out to be the "best" in this comparison, since it offers the "largest" ...
  • respectively 24-100mm f/1.8-2.8 concerning brightness respectively 24-70mm f/3.5-6.3 concerning brightness respectively 29-240mm f/3.5-6.3 concerning brightness The values of nnowak are responsible ...
  • Thanks. But f/1.8 remains a "bright" lens, if you just look at the exposure. By the relation of sensor sizes (crop factor) you can always convert the FL and the DOF (optical impression). Of course, ...
  • As fas as I understand, a f/2,0 lens gathers the same amount of light per unit area of the sensor, independent of its size. So a lens with f/2.0 for a 1''-sensor needs the same settings for ...
  • Concerning the amount of light: A f/1.8-2.8 lens always remains a bright lens, also compared to FF. The equivalent of f/5.0-8.0 can only refer to the optical impression (DOF). The same goes with ...
  • The RF100-400 is neither smaller nor lighter or cheaper than the 55-200mm. It would need a smaller R tele lens to compete with the M in these fields. It is clear to me, that there is a difference ...
  • I meant "native" M-lenses compared to "native" RF-S-lenses. Actually there are two RF-S-lenses. And I don't count RF lenses, since I also don't count third party lenses for the M. The same as ...
  • If you face the facts, obviously there is only small "movement" in the M-system. However, how can the new crop RF-S system replace the EOS-M? (1) Although the number of M-lenses is small, it is large ...
  • I am quite late to this thread, but here are some additional thoughts. I am using my M6 mk1 for 4,5 years now and I am still very satisfied with it. In the last 6 months I have "upgraded" with the ...
  • I also have this one, but as far as I know the 5L is superseded by the 6L bag. However, I can also highly recommend this bag.
  • Replied in For Comparison
    One has to add, that Nikon had made a strategic mistake, since they inserted a small sensor in a small body. They were afraid of cannibalizing their DSLRs, so they used a small 1'' sensor (13.2x8.8 ...
  • Due to the lack of time I am quite late with this reply. To me, the M6 is perfect for my needs. I am using it for walking, family shots, travelling or anything else. It is a perfectly balanced ...
  • Nice shot :-) Obviously (because of the large aperture) ISO 2500 would not have been necessary. But maybe your subject was quite lively, then you really need high ISO values :-D
  • Yes, you are right, there is no need for bashing. But please address this plea to those being responsible for it. Concerning Fuji: Yes, lots more choices. But to my mind, no better results. So it ...
  • Lots of fun with your new Sigma lens (although it is not the 32mm ;-) ) and greetings to the East Mediterranean
  • I don't have any EF-S lens, I only own EF-M lenses and one Sigma lens, the 56mm. But I can confirm Alexis: It is a great lens, and (beside my 32mm) one of the two lenses I would keep, if I had to ...
  • If I compare my mostly used lenses, here are the specs: Canon EF-M 32mm/1.4 = 459 € Fuji XF 33mm/1.4 = 789 € Fuji XF 35mm/1.4 = 510 € Canon EF-M 11-22mm/4.0-5.6 = 329 € Fuji XF 10-24mm/4.0 = 855 € ...
  • I have just compared two similar lenses in a large photo shop: Canon EF-M 32mm/1.4 = 459 EUR Fuji XF 33mm/1.4 = 789 EUR And the Canon lens is already assumed as an expensive lens.
  • Also here in Germany Fuji lenses are very expensive.
  • Why do you always keep repeating your thesis that M won't survive? As long as I take part here (for about 4 years) you regularly proclaim the end of the M. And concerning Fuji: I have tried two ...
Activity older than 12 months is not displayed.
Total messages 355
Threads started 16
Last post 2 weeks ago
Total comments 8
Total likes 32
Last post 5 months ago
Total reviews 0
Entries 7
Votes cast 5839
Last entry 5 months ago
Photos uploaded 0