dibe

If you know already that you are going to heavily crop in PP using digital zoom will help to make sure that your camera will focus on the "right" part of your picture to determine exposure, focus, ...

Thanks a lot! I don't think any PP will help here to mitigate the very obvious difference between the 12-200 and the 12-100 with digital zoom. My theory that the higher resolution/sharpness of the ...

Great, thank you. I am sorry to have so many requests and there is no hurry whatsover. So whenever it is convinient to you is fine. I think this is an interesting experiment though. Thanks again, Dirk

Hi Tom. Thanks for your help! I really appreciate this. But yes, wow, not even close. The 12-200 is way ahead here. But the second image does look a bit strange though. I wonder if you could also ...

Hello Tom, thanks for your feedback. What camera are you using for these tests? Next time you get a chance, could you also take a picture with the 12-100 at full zoom + using the build-in digital ...

Thanks for the additional information. You are probably right about this being very difficult to compare objectively. Also the program/algorythm used for the enlargement will probably impact this ...

So what does "Blur" mean here? If the 12-100 has a "2" and the 12-200 has a "4", does that mean that resolution is only half? But even if that is not quite the case. It does seem to me that with a ...

Well, I think while most reviews have confirmed that the 12-100 has very good resolution across the zoom range, they also attest the 12-200 some softness, especially at maximum zoom and in the ...

Maybe to add for clarification ... :-) I am talking about the Olympus lenses here. Also I have the E-M5 Mark II and this one does have a digital x2 zoom. I am assuming most other cameras will have ...

Hello everyone, not looking at weight, size, cost, weather sealing, or even max. aperture. Just resolution / sharpness. At maximum zoom, how close will the 12-100 (at 100) with digital zoom come to ...

8 Frames. Dirk

Also from Olympus, this time from the E-M1 page: [Sequential shooting H 15 fps] RAW: Max. 102 frames, JPEG (LN): Max. 134 frames [Sequential shooting L 10 fps] RAW: Max. 321 frames, JPEG (LN): ...

The Olympus specs page has a huge amount of data on this camera. Almost every question anyone had so far can be answered from this page: https://asia.olympus-imaging.com/product/dslr/em5mk3/spec.html ...

Again from the Olympus web-site: Maximum recording time:  Approx. 29 min so no luck on this one. Dirk

From the Olympus web-site: [Sequential shooting H 10fps] RAW: Max. 150 frames, JPEG (LF): Until card is full [Sequential shooting L 6fps] RAW, JPEG (LF): Until card is full [Silent sequential ...

Actually the Mark II had a UHS-II slot already. I always thought this was undervalued by many. Also dpreview is listing "In camera USB charging" as one of the features. Dirk

The review here ( ephotozine ) has this statement: Olympus says that the ISO performance has been improved by 2 stops, and ISO6400 is as good as ISO1600 on the E-M5 II, according to Olympus. We’ll ...

@Brent. I understand the Mark III will have improved noise control so that ISO 6400 is now like ISO 1600 in the Mark II. Do you think that will compensate for those 2 hours?

Please everyone, I would really like to keep this focused. So ... What this thread is not about : Mistakes that Olympus is making, price discussions, all the features you are missing, why you are ...

Actually it seems that there is at least one difference in the video section which is the addition of the high-speed mode (120 fps in FHD) . I don't think the E-M1 has that mode. So maybe there ...