Stu 5

That is the thing. It can only get worse for Sony now. Not better.

This is their problem, Sonys management has been arrogant for years. They think their brand name means something but they lost that a long time ago.

Yet Sonys market share does not show that as they struggle to currently increase it. At the same time Canons does increase. Plus Full frame is not where all the business is done anyway.

It is not just the lenses range that is the issue, it is the brand name. Sony damaged their brand name years ago.

Olympus had eye detect AF before Sony.

Maybe he meant to same other camera companies had eye detect AF before Sony.

He meant number one and two in the interchangeable lens camera market. Sony do not have the brand name of Apple either.

It will take a few more things than that but their biggest hold back is the brand name. Decades ago it meant good quality across all their product lines but not anymore for a long time.

He never claimed they were as good which you are well aware of MILC man. Fact is Sonys base model interchangeable lens FF camera is a lot more expensive than base models from Canon and Nikon. Price...

Often magazines get reviews out quicker than this website.

Because they have a place. A well printed photo will have far more impact in a magazine. Than on a computer screen. You only have to look at BJP magazine to appreciate that. There are many things...

Remember Canons sales are pulling away from Nikon and Sony. Sony has hardly made any headway regarding market share in the last few year worldwide. Both Canon and Nikon undercut the Sony A7 III on...

Same as Canon flashes are not made by Canon.

James Stirling don't give up the day job because as a comedian you will fail. As you will be well aware I was referring to the indoor photos taken at the Sony event, where Sony sets up the light so...

It will mean Sony will have had control over the lighting. Therefore allowing them to make it easier for the cameras to cope with.

Plus some horrible distortion.

But for how much longer before DXO bits the dust.

So you have used at least 6 different programmes to find the one you like to get away from Adobe. How much has that cost you in time and money and...

Testing a second camera body would have been sensible rather than rushing the report out.

EVF performance is still bad in the dark. I need to see accurately in the dark which EVF still cannot achieve.

No there is only one option. Blame the reviewer, because until the lens difference is ruled out you cannot blame the manufacturer. The same lens should have been used. There is no excuse for it....