Stu 5

This Dpreview article is about the sensors performance rather than using the camera, so you have rather missed the point of the article.

This will not be a bench mark camera for long. Even Sony will quickly upgrade it with a A9 Mk IIIV when they improve the sensor. When Nikon and Canon launch their versions they will wait to get it...

It might help if you did not show out of date photographs of the camera. This is what it looks like now...

https://www.kodak.com/en/motion/page/super-8-camera/

No it is for filmmakers.

It's the old Kodak film company.

You cannot get the effect of a Black Mist filter in Photoshop or any other software. If you think you have achieved it you are fooling yourself or just don't understand what a Black Mist filter does.

You can see what lights were used at times in one of the photos, Arri True Blue D motion picture lighting with ARRI flicker-free Electronic Ballasts, which meant this made this all very easy to...

You can see what lights were used at times in one or two of the photos, Arri True Blue D motion picture lighting with ARRI flicker-free Electronic Ballasts, which meant this made this all very easy...

You only need to look at the exposure settings to know the lighting was actually very good. You can also see what lights were used at times in one or two of the photos, Arri True Blue D motion...

It is still a step backwards compared to the A9II and A9 regarding dynamic range and noise level.

Ranger 9 it would concern me too as I have heard of the Z9 running into problems under certain theatre lighting. The problems with theatre productions and musical theatre is you don't have time to...

You can see no image sharpening has been applied to the scans of the prints.

It's quite easy to see they have applied no image sharpening to the scans. Not even the edges of the print are sharp.

Takes no more than 20 seconds on a Canon R5 file using an Apple M1 Studio Max.

Just ordered on the strength of your photos as I will use it for portraits. So if I hate it then it's all your fault. lol. At £349 on a Prime Day deal it seemed to good to pass on. Nice colour ...

Those times are processing what size files?

Barbu DXO gets better results on some photos but not all. Lightroom is better on dynamic range, so depending what your photos contain one will be better than the other at different times. Both are...

Vladyslav Kosulin the magenta tint is a problem at your end not Lightrooms. I have converted several R5 Raw files and not see that problem at all.

DarnGoodPhotos Topaz sometimes leaving weird patches of the untouched noises one of the reasons I gave up on it.

Andreas Berglundit might take you 1minute 43 seconds to process a R5 Raw file using Adobe AI denies but I am doing the same thing in 20 seconds which is not a lot longer than Topaz takes. I am...