Lives in Slovak Republic Slovak Republic
Works as a environmentalist
Joined on Dec 11, 2009


Total: 114, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

Link | Posted on Jan 17, 2018 at 22:09 UTC as 8th comment
On article Rokinon AF 50mm F1.4 FE: sample gallery and impressions (143 comments in total)

very nice pics

Link | Posted on Dec 18, 2017 at 14:47 UTC as 18th comment
On article Leica Thambar-M 90mm F2.2 sample gallery (214 comments in total)

great photos

Link | Posted on Nov 8, 2017 at 20:44 UTC as 6th comment
On article How do you know you need a new camera? (410 comments in total)
In reply to:

stanic042: I wonder how long will I bang the Pentax K5IIs around :)

actually, it is possible to make video with the K5IIs too :O
surely there are better options
geonyc, get back under that rock you troll :D

Link | Posted on Jun 1, 2017 at 21:51 UTC
On article How do you know you need a new camera? (410 comments in total)

I wonder how long will I bang the Pentax K5IIs around :)

Link | Posted on May 30, 2017 at 19:49 UTC as 15th comment | 4 replies
On article Canon will add C-Log to the EOS 5D Mark IV for $99 (464 comments in total)
In reply to:

Sdaniella: OK ...

Summary on Hi-Continuous Shooting: RAW (Uncompressed) = Maximum IQ

Canon FF EOS dSLRs:

1Dx MkII:
Pro-Action Max 16fps (Mirrorless-LV-Mode)
Pro-Action Max 14fps (Mirror-OVF-Mode)


5D MkIV:
Prosumer Max 7fps (Mirror-OVF-Mode)

SONY FF LV-capable dcams:

Mirrorless A9:
Pro-Action Max 12fps (Electronic Shutter)
Prosumer Max 5fps (Mechanical Shutter)


Prosumer Max 3fps*? or 6fps**? see notes below (Transparent Mirror)

*If A99II Max 12fps (=JPEG); then Max 6fps (Compressed RAW)
**If A99II Max 12fps (=Compressed RAW); then Max 6fps (=Uncompressed RAW)
... Sony only willing to admit in their A99II owner manual that Uncompressed RAW is "slower" than 12fps, and never admitting file type for max 12fps (may only be JPEG).

Sony A99II does, however, show their relative file sizes:
Uncompressed RAW is double the size of Compressed RAW
Uncompressed RAW is triple the size of Finest JPEG

lol she is still around the old style? :D

Link | Posted on Apr 22, 2017 at 09:50 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-T20 Review (380 comments in total)

very nice!

Link | Posted on Mar 24, 2017 at 10:22 UTC as 31st comment
In reply to:

(unknown member): And of course, what self-respecting urban pseudo-environmentalist would drive a (gasp!) fossil-fueled car? This thing MUST be electric! Despite the fact most 3rd World war zones won't have an ability to "fill it." BTW, who is going to fly this into Syria for them? Or does it do that too?

by 2030 it will be a paradise on earth, full of well paved roads offering 360° scenic views :D

Link | Posted on Jan 10, 2017 at 16:26 UTC

2000 dollar camera with tiny sensor and battery life under 500 clicks? no, thanks

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2016 at 08:18 UTC as 115th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

PKDanny: Good.

I realize that DPReview did not put K-70 in Review. Why didn't they do that?

if you can´t wait for more pentax bashing :D

Link | Posted on Oct 5, 2016 at 08:35 UTC

omg this is so cool :D

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2016 at 07:31 UTC as 41st comment
On article Under pressure: Canon vs. Nikon in a hydraulic press (286 comments in total)

analog image compression :D

Link | Posted on Jul 8, 2016 at 07:47 UTC as 82nd comment
In reply to:

John Driggers: This announcement will create another flurry of misunderstanding for a lot of users. What is on offer is not full flash synch at speeds higher than your camera's rated synch speed. The synch speed for full power flash will remain limited by the capabilty of your shutter to evenly expose the entire sensor. At some point focal plane shutters begin the 'moving slit' mode to achieve faster shutter speeds; leaf shutters begin to introduce vignetting; and electronic shutters have not reached the point where they can match higher speed shutter timings with the timing of the radio pulses and flash triggering timing of consumer (versus scientific) cameras. What is on offer is the low flash power, high pulse rate stroboscopic flash work-around for the problem of the physical limitations of current camera shutter synch speeds. I am NOT saying this isn't a good product or that it isn't pushing the boundaries a bit. But I am saying that a lot of folks will now tout this as the answer to questions about full power flash synching at higher speeds (like on the new Hassleblad), proudly asserting that their canikon now flash synchs at high shutter speeds with these triggers 'just like the new Hassleblad or a leaf shutter Fuji X100'. That may be true if a weak-ass pulsing flash meets your beyond x-synch needs. If so, then I am happy for you. But, for many that is not the case. So when those folks are pursuing questions about their needs for full power high speed flash sync, please don't pop into the forums and offer up these triggers as the solution. Too many folks don't understand the difference between HSS (pulsing low power flash) and full power flash synch at high x-synch shutter speeds. They'll buy these triggers, find they don't work for their needs and claim the triggers don't work right or are falsely advertised. That would be a shame, because (used within their limitations) these are probably a pretty good product.

a photographer should know

Link | Posted on Jun 28, 2016 at 06:09 UTC
On a photo in the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III Real-world Samples Gallery sample gallery (1 comment in total)

really nice

Link | Posted on May 19, 2016 at 15:12 UTC as 1st comment just to figure out how to import it from us to eu without tax :D

Link | Posted on May 9, 2016 at 13:24 UTC as 130th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

stanic042: uff, amazing, even better than the benchmark camera

my bad - but the lack of moiré f.ex. in the "family looking at the painting" part of the test image, compared to the Phase One, is really sweet

Link | Posted on May 9, 2016 at 11:02 UTC

uff, amazing, even better than the benchmark camera

Link | Posted on May 9, 2016 at 06:49 UTC as 12th comment | 2 replies

I have it and I like it very much

Link | Posted on Mar 13, 2016 at 20:36 UTC as 35th comment
In reply to:

PKDanny: WHY MACRO????

because interesting pictures

Link | Posted on Mar 13, 2016 at 20:34 UTC
On article Worth the wait? A look inside the Pentax K-1 (643 comments in total)
In reply to:

moji: I have been waiting since 2006 and now i am deeply sorry. It is here, the first impression says it is an excellent camera, the price is fantastic. so why sorry? Because it came so late. Now, it is difficult and unsure economic situation here in Norway and the Norwegian Kroner has gone so down. All these make it difficult if not impossible for me to put my hand on such a beautiful machine. Anyhow, I would like to congratulate all those who patiently waited and wish good luck, At the same time I have to thank Ricoh for being so serious and so consumer friendly. Good luck.

Lol at the poor and economically ruined Norwegians :-D

Link | Posted on Feb 20, 2016 at 15:18 UTC
Total: 114, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »