bowportes

By moving the bright-line framing. The closer the subject, the more the focus box and brightlines move/adjust. Moving the camera changes what is captured, but parallax -- the difference between ...

How about Robert for the east coast Bob and Bobby for the more casual west coast Bob? Thanks for your work in the Forum!

It's great to have your voice back on the Forum

Yep... Fuji has made cameras since the 1940s. When I was a young adult during the 70s, they were called Fujicas.

It's unrealistic to expect that the X-T4 would receive the universal praise of the highly acclaimed X-Pro3.  You need to lower your expectations.

I agree completely. The X-Pro line will always be "a flagship" (not "the flagship") because its uniqueness defines Fuji's approach.  It doesn't have to be the latest or greatest, but it continues ...

I would say it's not the same subject. Had you wanted the same subject, you would have moved much closer with the 23.

Good to have you back.

Great shots. Thanks for posting, and also for the lighting information.

I think defining a mobile app as an extension of the camera is a horrible idea. The last thing I'd want to do when using my camera is worry about my phone.  I don't need to be more tethered to my ...

Yeah... I upgraded to the X-Pro3 and for the life of me, I can't understand all the "rear screen" complaints.  What I like about the X-Pro3 rear-screen solution 1. It's hidden away... not there ...

The XT series, at least where the absence of PASM is concerned, is no more manual in controls than the X-P or X-H series, so I wouldn't say they should definitely look at the X-Ts. The X-E1 and 2 ...

With Fuji you have separate controls for SS and aperture, both of which can be set individually to automatic. That's an older model of operation than having a PASM dial as a dominant physical ...

I prefer certain things about the X-Pro2 OVF (the extended range in FL), but other things about the X-Pro3 OVF (it's larger, brighter, has brighter overlays, and generally is easier to see with ...

I own both the 50 and 56. If I'm going out to shoot portraits specifically, I'll take the 56mm for greater control of depth of field. However if I'm going out with another zoom or prime and want to ...

Maybe it's better to just express your own preferences than to tell others what they will wish. I purchased the f/1.4 first and was happy to unload it after I purchased the f/2.  No looking back.

I have one with a clear viewer attached, which enables you to see better outside in bright sunlight.  A great little camera. That said, it's not really "1st generation" colors, etc. as far as the ...

The differences in OVF between X-Pro2 and X-Pro3 are much more nuanced than you describe -- there are advantages to both OVFs. This is the best account I've seen: ...

I owned both and sold the 35mm F1.4.  The 35 F2 suits the X-Pro series better, is fast and small and produces excellent images. I, for one, saw no "magic" with the F1.4 and therefore think that's ...

Here's what the 23mm F1.4 looks like with no lens hood. It intrudes very little into the frame lines for composition purposes. That said, it's a matter of what you become accustomed to -- it ...