mmcfine

Lives in Australia Bondi, NSW, Australia
Works as a Designer
Has a website at www.migo.com.au
Joined on Jan 14, 2012
About me:

I would like to make the world a better place....ye right...-)

Comments

Total: 128, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

mmcfine: I look at this article from a different perspective. What makes a place 'picturesque'. Why one landmark is more 'pleasing' and 'engaging' universally than other landmarks? With today's artificial-making technology will picturesque landmarks be a thing of the past? Why send a crew and pay expensive fees if you can create your own picturesque landmark artificially. Just a thought.

I agree cdembrey. superimposing is not new or even related to the new digital era. However what constitutes a picturesque scene, landmark or beauty in general?

Link | Posted on Nov 4, 2017 at 01:06 UTC

I look at this article from a different perspective. What makes a place 'picturesque'. Why one landmark is more 'pleasing' and 'engaging' universally than other landmarks? With today's artificial-making technology will picturesque landmarks be a thing of the past? Why send a crew and pay expensive fees if you can create your own picturesque landmark artificially. Just a thought.

Link | Posted on Nov 3, 2017 at 23:31 UTC as 73rd comment | 2 replies
On article Sony a9: more speed, less dynamic range (669 comments in total)
In reply to:

mmcfine: 4 years with Canon 6D and going strong. great ISO range and plenty of room to push shadows in post. Interesting technical article though.

I agree. The numbers don't lie. I am fine with my 6D dynamic range. Composition and subject matter are far more important for me than numbers.

Link | Posted on Oct 31, 2017 at 03:11 UTC
On article Review: Affinity Photo 1.5.2 for desktop (302 comments in total)
In reply to:

mmcfine: simply put. Adobe aims at the professional market (always had) and as a professional there is simply NO alternative to Adobe. Period. This has nothing to do with performance, features or price. It's mostly due to tight integrations and leader in print/ digital standards. For hobby and home users who do not make money out of photography you can simply use the free software that was shipped with your camera or the abundance of semi-pro apps like Affinity.

Guys, relax, I am not judging anyone. If I was a pro photographer I too would have looked at alternatives. I am not hooked on Adobe. For only photo editing/ archiving I don't mind using Mac Photo even but when it comes to agency workflow it's hard to escape Adobe.

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2017 at 06:23 UTC
On article Review: Affinity Photo 1.5.2 for desktop (302 comments in total)
In reply to:

mmcfine: simply put. Adobe aims at the professional market (always had) and as a professional there is simply NO alternative to Adobe. Period. This has nothing to do with performance, features or price. It's mostly due to tight integrations and leader in print/ digital standards. For hobby and home users who do not make money out of photography you can simply use the free software that was shipped with your camera or the abundance of semi-pro apps like Affinity.

@vadims,
thanks for checking on me before you comment. I didn't know one needs to 'investigate' another person just to post a comment. However I am not a pro photographer but been working in design for more then 25 years connecting with hundreds of freelances and media pros globally and if you think that an agency can run on apps like Affinity for quick sharing, turnarounds and ROI then you wrong. I don't like Adobe, Apple or any other company making trillions on our backs but until a true alternative will rise I have no option but to 'gel' with the devil.

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2017 at 15:30 UTC
On article Review: Affinity Photo 1.5.2 for desktop (302 comments in total)

simply put. Adobe aims at the professional market (always had) and as a professional there is simply NO alternative to Adobe. Period. This has nothing to do with performance, features or price. It's mostly due to tight integrations and leader in print/ digital standards. For hobby and home users who do not make money out of photography you can simply use the free software that was shipped with your camera or the abundance of semi-pro apps like Affinity.

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2017 at 05:05 UTC as 56th comment | 8 replies
On article Hands-on with the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III (204 comments in total)

I seriously don't understand what 'beginners' means anymore. Does plastic and scene modes constitute a beginner's camera? Not long ago 'professionals used far less competent cameras. I am not an Oly user but won't see why not buy a 'cheap' body to use with good expensive glass.

Link | Posted on Sep 1, 2017 at 02:17 UTC as 35th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

mmcfine: Another solution is to have 'intelligent' sensors or software that will enable us to set exposure for specific parts of the sensor. Basically in mirrorless cameras one can set the bottom part (or shadow range) to use ISO 400 while the top at ISO 50. This is the same as dark room exposure techniques but done digitally directly on the sensor.

@jyiu986 This is one great example. thanks for sharing. Like I said, it will just be a matter of time until these types of software will be available in cameras as a standard or add-on setting.
Once you remove a mechanical shutter from the exposure triangle you basically have the freedom to electronically expose light to various regions of the sensor.

Link | Posted on Aug 25, 2017 at 01:03 UTC
In reply to:

mmcfine: Another solution is to have 'intelligent' sensors or software that will enable us to set exposure for specific parts of the sensor. Basically in mirrorless cameras one can set the bottom part (or shadow range) to use ISO 400 while the top at ISO 50. This is the same as dark room exposure techniques but done digitally directly on the sensor.

@Leonp, did I mention the word 'problem' in my comment?

Link | Posted on Aug 24, 2017 at 09:50 UTC

Another solution is to have 'intelligent' sensors or software that will enable us to set exposure for specific parts of the sensor. Basically in mirrorless cameras one can set the bottom part (or shadow range) to use ISO 400 while the top at ISO 50. This is the same as dark room exposure techniques but done digitally directly on the sensor.

Link | Posted on Aug 24, 2017 at 04:49 UTC as 19th comment | 7 replies
In reply to:

cdembrey: I've seen no reason to replace my Canon 40D. When all your photos go on the web, 10Mp is enough ;-) It's great to not have G.A.S.

@Geoflys
The 40D was my best Canon and I wish I kept it instead of 'throwing' money on useless upgrades over the years. However if you already have Canon glass and have been using APS-C for years then what's the dilemma? Get the 80D for $789. It's a no brainer. Why to move to a complete new system?

Link | Posted on Aug 14, 2017 at 23:31 UTC

why do you use the word 'upgrade'? it's not an upgrade, downgrade or sidegrade... it's just another device with some shared components. FF is no longer an 'upgrade'. get over it.

Link | Posted on Aug 14, 2017 at 00:30 UTC as 47th comment | 3 replies
On article Should I buy a Canon EOS 6D Mark II? (449 comments in total)
In reply to:

herein2017: I signed up for DPR just to make this comment. I fully intend on getting this camera when it drops to $1500.00. I specialize in fashion, lifestyle, portrait, and real estate photography, I also do real estate, architecture, and venue video tours, this to me is the perfect camera for my video virtual tours for the following reasons (in order of importance);
1) My entire existing camera ecosystem will work with it (flashes, remote triggers, battery grips, lenses, mounting plates, tripods, etc)
2) It is light enough to pair with my Zhiyun Crane and Ronin M gimbals
3) It will do 1080P@60FPS which means I can do slow motion video
4) In an emergency situation it can be used as a backup body for my 5D4

So what if the DR isn't perfect and it does not do 4K, that stuff only matters to pixel peepers. I have never had to recover shadows from -6EV or had a customer not hire me because of 4K. Composition, proper lighting, and a reliable camera body are way more important in the real world.

@armandino
While I agree that the competition might have 'better' features/ performance the price is also significantly higher and for a different market segment. What other FF cameras are out there at the same price point?

Link | Posted on Aug 7, 2017 at 02:31 UTC
In reply to:

Joed700: Wow, Sony has come a long way. Back then the Nikon F3 was the choice for NASA to deploy into space and now it's Sony. Great job!

Yes @smhain. I agree. 'they' chose Sony or maybe Sony paid/ partnered with the Japanese Space Agency. I have no problem with Sony I think it's a great choice. What I am saying is that there are many if not hundreds of imaging devices out there (try Telescopes and expedition modules) that use anything from bespoke to P&S cameras.

Link | Posted on Jul 28, 2017 at 03:54 UTC
In reply to:

Joed700: Wow, Sony has come a long way. Back then the Nikon F3 was the choice for NASA to deploy into space and now it's Sony. Great job!

It's a Japanese rocket sending supplies to a space station not a human carrying space module landing on the moon. If you search 'photos/ videos taken from space' in Google you'll find various cameras and equipment used by agencies and individual astronauts.

Link | Posted on Jul 28, 2017 at 00:21 UTC
In reply to:

goodgeorge: I am still quite surprised how many beginners spend so much money on Photoshop while we have Affinity for a few bucks or GIMP completely for free.

For beginners who want to make a career our of photography and the arts or share files with professional services, PS is unfortunately a necessary tool to know.

Link | Posted on Jul 25, 2017 at 23:37 UTC

no need to invent new regulations. Come to Australia. We have regulations from wall to wall covering any dumb-ass across the globe. -)

Link | Posted on Jul 25, 2017 at 01:55 UTC as 18th comment | 5 replies
On article Should I buy a Canon EOS 6D Mark II? (449 comments in total)
In reply to:

herein2017: I signed up for DPR just to make this comment. I fully intend on getting this camera when it drops to $1500.00. I specialize in fashion, lifestyle, portrait, and real estate photography, I also do real estate, architecture, and venue video tours, this to me is the perfect camera for my video virtual tours for the following reasons (in order of importance);
1) My entire existing camera ecosystem will work with it (flashes, remote triggers, battery grips, lenses, mounting plates, tripods, etc)
2) It is light enough to pair with my Zhiyun Crane and Ronin M gimbals
3) It will do 1080P@60FPS which means I can do slow motion video
4) In an emergency situation it can be used as a backup body for my 5D4

So what if the DR isn't perfect and it does not do 4K, that stuff only matters to pixel peepers. I have never had to recover shadows from -6EV or had a customer not hire me because of 4K. Composition, proper lighting, and a reliable camera body are way more important in the real world.

Exactly. Nicely put.

Link | Posted on Jul 21, 2017 at 00:47 UTC
On article Should I buy a Canon EOS 6D Mark II? (449 comments in total)
In reply to:

mmcfine: I use both the 80D and 6D1 and no, I won't buy the 6D2.

I must admit that I mostly use the 80D for video and internal office shots for social media and web so I don't really look at DR however the 6D together with the 24-105L lens produces nicer more pleasing photos (might be the L lens not the sensor). In terms of daily use I do think that the 80D is just easier to work with due to the tilt/ touch screen, better focus and headphone for video.
Overall I think people are going a little bit crazy with DR and ISO. There are far more important factors to look for.

Link | Posted on Jul 21, 2017 at 00:41 UTC
On article Should I buy a Canon EOS 6D Mark II? (449 comments in total)

I use both the 80D and 6D1 and no, I won't buy the 6D2.

Link | Posted on Jul 20, 2017 at 02:16 UTC as 42nd comment | 2 replies
Total: 128, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »