hungrylau

If you are a prime shooter, then a Sony a7iii + 1-2 batteries and: (1) Sony FE20 f/1.8 or the more expensive 24mm f/1.4GM (2) Sony FE35 f/1.8 or the ...

If the cost between the two bodies is not an issue, then you may as well get an a7iv. There are a lot of small improvements that add up which make it worthwhile.

I am just an amateur that takes holiday snaps and family photos. Pics from my em10mk1, my friend's fuji x100t and my a7iii are received with an equal amt of love from my family. The fujis are ...

It will take some time to get used to the menu systems, but you have correctly identified that having customisable scroll wheels is pretty damned sweet. Having such great AF and such nice, compact ...

I've gotten accustomed to gripping quite hard on my 50mm loxia to remove it. The pressure has pushed the aperture ring into some type of sensor and I now have issues whereby f/2.0 doesn't read ...

Thanks for confirming the other parts of what I've just written. There's been so many threads about this since the a6000 has come out that I don't care to re-tread old ground. If you still need ...

whenever these threads come up you have the same useless commentary. 1. your monitor is not calibrated 2. your workflow and everything can be adjusted 3. its all guesswork and your perception ...

Yes, the fuji and the leica crowd - it's still just a tool. It can be a very fun tool to use, but it's still a tool. I have some blue steel japanese knives that are absolute lasers, almost cut a ...

(1) sony a7iii. just a perfect setup but its not as portable as an a6000 + apsc lenses. (2) fuji x100f - borrowed this ...

Doesn't Leica or some other brand make a stills only camera? It's not Sony, it will never be Sony. They have always had video as a part of their camera division's DNA.

Doesn't seem like there is a need for it? At this stage, I'd hold out more hope for a complete menu redesign..

I just don't think you've done the same type of travelling that I've done.

Yeah you're right about that. Sounds eyewatering, but I have worked hard and can afford it.. Looking back several years ago, I paid 2200 aud for the a7iii and the a7rii was about 1900 aud at the ...

Yes and I have three of them now. A great solution indeed. That 980 pound difference is something I will pay for the convenience of not juggling so many batteries. It's just plain annoying.

The travel i've undertaken incorporates the use of several powerbanks. Thanks for you input champ!

Daily trips and/or weekend trips which incorporate some landscape photography = a7rii. Week long and longer vacation trips where several people have battery powered devices, there's competititon ...

I see they haven't written anything about how terrible the ergonomics are on their loxias, which appear to be a triumph of fancy design over functionality :o

In Australia, we have a two year statutory warranty and there are guidelines which say that the more expensive something is, the longer the implied warranty on an item might be. Sorry to hear about ...

I'd still look for something wider than 28mm. I really enjoy images from 16-24mm and while I have the 24mm GM, I find that I'm still reaching for my old beat up 16-35 f/4. But if you're used to ...

I chose the a7iii over the a7rii because I didn't want to juggle my battery inventory while travelling. It was a wise decision for me because we had: (1) mobile phone 1 - apple iphone of some sort