PhotoTeach2

I agree ... they have GOT to have a (sharp) LEICA lens equivalent to the Zeiss 600mm-EFL @ f/2.4-4. Assuming it is as advertised, they have GOT to use the new Sony sensor, (ala if Sony will "sell" it).

Very -- VERY Well Done !!!

Very -- Very Nice ... Thank You

Interesting, where is this at ???

Back in 1972 I had a rangefinder Canon QL17-GIII, (also had a couple of SLR's), that had an minimal shutter-lag that I used for "fast" action because of it short-lag. I once went to a "disco" ...

Happy to add another +1 for that ...

Mark, with all due respect, that is a guarantee way to get a "shaky" photo from too-long and exposure, (especially if you have an f/stop like f/8 set). And in Aperture Priority you only have "1" ...

What kind of cameras was he using ???.. One with a very short shutter-lag ??? (I suspect not SLR/d/SLR because they have a long lag.)

I know you were asking the other OP but I remember back in FF days, I did have a 500mm but NEVER was able to use it. Every time I saw an animal where I needed it ... it was GONE by the time I was ...

True, but most larger prints are not viewed up-close. There is a theory that 8mpx is sufficient for 300dpi @ 8"x10", and that should be sufficient for ANY larger size because the bigger they are, ...

I fully appreciate that you don't need a FA-LCD but obviously you have not seen the many post of even dSLR users that prefer the D5500 specifically because of its FA-LCD. Indeed there have been ...

I may be misunderstanding the above, but with the FA-LCD of the FZ series, I can either keep it nested backwards, ( thus protecting the LCD ), or swing it out, REVERSE it and then re-nest it with ...

I have not actually used the RX10 but it seems to me that all these restrictions can SLOW ME DOWN when I may need it the most. On the FZ series, you can shoot at any f/stop @ any shutter-speed, (up ...

You must have a LOT of money if you want longer than 600mm (@ f/4) on a larger sensor ???

Absolutely RIGHT ... I WANT this camera, (or at least the sensor -- and lens). I do a lot of air-shows -- going to Reno Air Races this week. But I currently use and rely on both the FA-LCD and ...

There is no question that the RX10-III took some sales away from FZ, (600mm-EFL @ f/4). There is no question that this new sensor, (and A9), technology also will take even more. And for some, ...

But a fully-articulating would not prevent a "centered-to-lens" tripod mount.  (I think the FZ-2500 has it.) But the RX does not even have 1/4000s, which can be useful if you want to shoot f/2.8 in ...

But you are then back to ILC and that is the whole point of the RX/FZ series. While smaller sensors allow the extended-range zoom, (even up to 2000mm-EFL on 1/2.3"), this appears to be what is ...

It is available on the RX10xx, but there is no requirement that you use it. So I suggest you do NOT use it. But personally I wish I had it on the FZ for me to use as an option when/if I may want.

Obviously you were not around in the old days when we spent lots of money on soft-focus, diffusion, fog, etc. filters. If you didn't have the money for filters you smeared Vaseline on the lens/filter.