beatboxa

Generally, landscapes & travel on your camera will be best under 20mm. The indoor photos would probably be better around 35mm, though a faster lens will be very important. I'd recommend you look ...

Why are you wasting time or replying to me? Why don't you just reply to the OP and say that the OP has asked a question that you have deemed irrelevant to the OP? What do these examples have to do ...

Then this topic is irrelevant to you.  This conversation is on the topic of equivalence.

"Full responsibility" would mean he is refunding, paying royalties, and getting rid of any and all cash and benefits he gained as a result of this con.

It's not only to get the same DoF.  Did you not understand the other 10 or so replies to you regarding this point?  Did you see the headline in article I previously linked to you? Just in case you ...

Equivalence refers to achieving roughly the same perceived output. You can do this with combinations of: (1) optics (lenses, teleconverters, etc.) (2) capture area ...

If you are unconcerned with achieving the same shot noise and the same depth of field or background blur across systems, then you are unconcerned with equivalence. Your lack of concern does not ...

It's not just about noise (and some different-sized sensors are actually based on the same, identical pixel technology--eg. Nikon D7000 & D800). There are many other aspects besides noise that were ...

A Canon T7i costs more than double what a D3400 costs. The comparable Canon to the Nikon D3400 is the Canon T6. The T6 does not have touch screen, nor does it have dual pixel autofocus.  Both have ...

Neither of these points deals with equivalence. Comparing lenses of equivalent focal length at the same f/ratio does not produce an equivalent photo . For an equivalent photo, you need to have the ...

These were all taken by a 7-year-old, who knew how to move the dial to green.  Or sometimes, I'll enter some settings for her, like shutter priority + auto-ISO, etc. She knows how to turn on the ...

No, each is not right.  There are some basic concepts here that you are missing.

Sorry, but I don't understand what you're trying to say. Yes, sensor A is 4x larger than sensor B. If it's raining at a constant rate, sensor A has collected 4x more rain than B; and yes, it is ...

There is no such thing as "correct" exposure. The ISO between APS-C and FF does not offer the same performance.  ISO 800 on full frame is twice as sensitive as ISO 800 on APS-C.  They will offer ...

One issue with this is that you're equating specs with their effects in one case but not the other. Focal length is not the same thing as angle of view--focal length is the spec, and when combined ...

I scrolled up and didn't see what you're referring to. The closest thing is my post where I said this: (1) Some people seem to care more about comparing specs than actual photography. Why? No idea. Not ...

LOL is that your default go-to one-trick criticism? Not the first time you've said that. I told you before that I don't post to my gallery here, but I suppose that concept is too complicated for ...

Who said anything about memorizing?  Apparently, you've never learned anything before. Or you're incredibly unintelligent & slow. Interestingly, you removed the entire beginning of my response: (1) One ...

If these were raw photos, open them up in your raw editor of choice and turn down the exposure compensation slider and/or curves to see if there is usable data there.  If not, you're out of luck.

Then you don't shoot landscapes or astrophotography from awkward angles or with tilt-shift lenses.  I do. Naiive people with no skills and no creativity think specs or price = upgrade.