Heinz

Thank you. In fact it was so foggy in the first shot, that you can't bearely see anything in the original jpeg.

Thanks !

Thank you !

Honestly it's not that difficult. The thing is to recognize it and to go out in "bad" weather :-)

Yes, the good OIS is a really helpful since i have no Ibis ans I'm a tripod muffle :-)

Thanks!

Thank you!

Hi, More or less edited to emphasize the perceived mood. All with my trusty 16-80 :-) Heinz http://flickr.com/photos/55025133@N02 http://500px.com/hejakma

Some time ago there was an interesting thread about the "3D" effect in a German forum. Thay came to the conclusion that it depends on several requirements. As much i remember it was like this : 1. ...

Shows once more that the flexibility of a zoom is hard to beat. Imo the best images are from the 16-80. Ultrawide is rarely useable in an appropriate way imo.

If the jpeg is sharp, the Raw is also sharp. :-) Seriously i had never the case that the jpeg was sharp and the Raw not. I use mostly sharpen 0 or +1.

about those film sims. I have classic negative with C1 on the T3 but never ever used it.

I can only refer to my copy. My Vitrox 56 is crazy sharp, probably the sharpest 1.4 lens i ever owned. It is sharper @ 1.4 than the 16-80 at 5.6. It is sharper than my XF 56 and XF35 at 1.4 at ...

Just don't overthink it. Back in film days it was a problem, yes. But with digital? With mirrorless you even have the advantage of having an EFV. I use standard pattern metering and adjust it to ...

From what i have seen the iq isn't nearly as good as the XF. Whats to be expected

People seem to really be obsessed with image sharpness these days. Me too sometimes :) The  paradox is, that most images from other photographers i really like are not that sharp at all. It is ...

I'm perfectly happy with C1.

Andy Mumford really uses the X system for his work, whereas many other youtubers rather use Fuji for clickbaiting, yes, you heard right one admitted that Fuji brings MUCH traffic to his channel. ...

The focal plane is a little further forward on the X-T4 image, the leave in the front is sharper, in the Nikon image the leave in the middle is sharper thats all imo. Also contrast is a little ...

Actually 16mm is the sharpest fl of the 16-80. https://www.lenstip.com/571.4-Lens_review-Fujifilm_Fujinon_XF_16-80_mm_f_4_R_OIS_WR_Image_resolution.html