Heinz

X-T20 has also it's strong points compared to X-T2. Better 1080 Video quality, less to no purple grid problem. I gave up to buy bodies new years ago. Burns to much money imo.

How about keeping it and take great pictures? i guess you bought the X-E3 for a certain reason? It's much more compact, has great af and iq is almost indistinguishable from X-T3.

Hi folks, True is that it's a little slower than lr. After twaking the preview settings it's bearable imo. You can tweak the gui to almost resemble lightroom. Most functions are there except for ...

Thank you. No, all tweaked in silver efex

Some from Baden Baden, a picturesque little town in the southwest of Germany. All with X-T20+18-55. The last with 27mm

They don't hate ist, it's just (almost) useleless if only abailable in Live View.

Hi, The only "problem" with x-trans is, that ACR/LR STILL ISN'T ABLE TO DEMOSAIC THE X-TRANS FILES TO THEIR FULL POTENTIAL. And i say this as a LR user. Try irident developer or even C1 and you ...

You're right. Remembered i wrong. The reviewer wrote "I've been told that the “H” stands for “High-End” but it might as well have been “Hybrid” ...

Wrong, it means "Hybrid"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHjCKiXDIDc

I bought a X-E1+27mm as a pocketable addition to my Nikon D610. Now the D610 has gone and much more Fuji gear arrived. Bit honestly i never put my Fuji in a pocket yet :-)

https://blog.mingthein.com/2016/06/26/digital-resolution-why-enough-will-probably-never-be-enough/

Nope, it's not. You never get exactly the same with LR. The diferences are subtle, but they are there. If the differences matter to in practical use is a different story. Here is a good video ...

No, it's probably NOT the same problem. Look here. https://www.fujirumors.com/backlit-artifacts-sony-a7iii-dpreview-wrong-fujifilm-final-word-x-trans-backlit-artifacts-myth/

First of all i think the pictures aren't comparable at all. The A7 III is an interesting Body for sure. But in the end, nothing changed. Fullframe lenses are still big and heavy. It depends on WHY ...

Exactly.

Hm, i don't miss IS at all. I knew before i bought it that it hasn't this feature. There is no and probably will be no IS in Fuji cameras for known reasons. But we have choices, right?

Yes, it's the lens for sure, that a well lit/flash photo looks much better than a poor lit high iso photo with open aperture. Come on, your test is a joke. The plane of focus is razor thin at such ...

Yes, definitly different. I also wondered when i got my T20. Mine sounds exactly the same. So everything fine i guess.