-
Thank you. In fact it was so foggy in the first shot, that you can't bearely see anything in the original jpeg.
-
-
-
Honestly it's not that difficult. The thing is to recognize it and to go out in "bad" weather :-)
-
Yes, the good OIS is a really helpful since i have no Ibis ans I'm a tripod muffle :-)
-
-
-
Hi, More or less edited to emphasize the perceived mood. All with my trusty 16-80 :-) Heinz http://flickr.com/photos/55025133@N02 http://500px.com/hejakma
-
Some time ago there was an interesting thread about the "3D" effect in a German forum. Thay came to the conclusion that it depends on several requirements. As much i remember it was like this : 1. ...
-
Shows once more that the flexibility of a zoom is hard to beat. Imo the best images are from the 16-80. Ultrawide is rarely useable in an appropriate way imo.
-
If the jpeg is sharp, the Raw is also sharp. :-) Seriously i had never the case that the jpeg was sharp and the Raw not. I use mostly sharpen 0 or +1.
-
about those film sims. I have classic negative with C1 on the T3 but never ever used it.
-
I can only refer to my copy. My Vitrox 56 is crazy sharp, probably the sharpest 1.4 lens i ever owned. It is sharper @ 1.4 than the 16-80 at 5.6. It is sharper than my XF 56 and XF35 at 1.4 at ...
-
Just don't overthink it. Back in film days it was a problem, yes. But with digital? With mirrorless you even have the advantage of having an EFV. I use standard pattern metering and adjust it to ...
-
From what i have seen the iq isn't nearly as good as the XF. Whats to be expected
-
People seem to really be obsessed with image sharpness these days. Me too sometimes :) The paradox is, that most images from other photographers i really like are not that sharp at all. It is ...
-
I'm perfectly happy with C1.
-
Andy Mumford really uses the X system for his work, whereas many other youtubers rather use Fuji for clickbaiting, yes, you heard right one admitted that Fuji brings MUCH traffic to his channel. ...
-
The focal plane is a little further forward on the X-T4 image, the leave in the front is sharper, in the Nikon image the leave in the middle is sharper thats all imo. Also contrast is a little ...
-
Actually 16mm is the sharpest fl of the 16-80. https://www.lenstip.com/571.4-Lens_review-Fujifilm_Fujinon_XF_16-80_mm_f_4_R_OIS_WR_Image_resolution.html
Activity older than 12 months is not displayed.
|
Total messages |
1861 |
Threads started |
109 |
Last post |
3 months ago |
Photos uploaded |
11 |
Last upload |
Oct 12, 2013 |
|