Lives in Czech Republic Prague, Czech Republic
Has a website at
Joined on Oct 21, 2009


Total: 160, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article 2017 Holiday Gift Guide: Over $200 (8 comments in total)
In reply to:

io_bg: Wasn't the first 24-70mm f/2.8 lens the Canon one of 2002? If yes, then "professional and enthusiast photographers have relied on the flexibility offered by a classic 24-70mm F2.8 zoom" only for one full decade ;)

It was:

Link | Posted on Nov 19, 2017 at 19:16 UTC
On article Hands-on with new Canon L-series primes (295 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ebrahim Saadawi: I hope you give us some insight on the image quality of the 85mm L and how it stacks up against the Sigma 85mm ART and Otus 85mm, particularly in wide open sharpness.

Image stabilization makes it a very attractive close-up lens for actors.

If you could do a side by side with the 1.2 L that'd be really appreciated too, just to see if this new one maintains that "magical" look of the older lens in term of bokeh quality and colour and flaring and just the whole image. One side by side picture would do.

Plus Canon will definitely have more reliable focus than Sigma...

Link | Posted on Oct 27, 2017 at 06:08 UTC
In reply to:

rrccad: it makes sense for them to keep up development, they have subscription licenses tied to LR Classic CC that fund it.

unlike LR standalone, there wasn't any real recurring revenue funding continued development as an another product.

IMO the naming could be alot better with this, it's confusing to say the least.

What could be a dfference between (old) LR CC and LR standalone? Couple of lines of code or some switches in code builder?

Link | Posted on Oct 23, 2017 at 18:29 UTC
In reply to:

Absolutic: I'd love a jacket with several pockets large enough for big lenses


Link | Posted on Oct 20, 2017 at 20:00 UTC

Small mirrorless, small gorillapod and couple of other small accesories can be put into the lot of jacket, nothing special here. I was expecting something to put my usual kit - 5 lenses and pro DSLR - in :)

Link | Posted on Oct 20, 2017 at 17:00 UTC as 80th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

elgol20: Where is the standalone version?

Well, Adobe's revenue is bigger than before, from that point of view subscription works extremely well...

Link | Posted on Oct 18, 2017 at 13:34 UTC
In reply to:

Mike CH: Just one question: Why?

I use Paddy for Lightroom, which does pretty much the same thing. The purpose is to speed up process - no need to click on tiny sliders

Link | Posted on Oct 10, 2017 at 09:31 UTC
In reply to:

blackcoffee17: I wonder if a drop-in filter would not be a solution for these kind of UWA lenses, just like the big telephotos have.
It might make the lens 1-2cm longer but wouldn't have to buy a massive filter mounting system and spend a fortune on huge filters.
At least for ND filters would be quite practical.

Sorry, haven't realized i sent this 4 times now. I was getting 404 errors when tried to post earlier.

It is. It's impossible to make them perfectly planar, they degrade image quality, adding haze, are easy to scratch... it's only plastic. Have been using them on Canon 14/2.8 and Irix 11/4 for coupoe of years only if it is an absolute must.

Link | Posted on Sep 13, 2017 at 04:50 UTC

Gel filters are crap. I wish Aurora Aperture makes glass rear filter holder soon...

Link | Posted on Sep 12, 2017 at 17:31 UTC as 7th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

ioscar: Please be aware. Their last Kickstarter project had some major flaws and issues on communication and delivery of the product:

Priolite is established german company, what does it have to do with this campaing?

Link | Posted on Sep 1, 2017 at 17:53 UTC

Only 9 backers in 4 days...

Link | Posted on Sep 1, 2017 at 06:01 UTC as 11th comment
In reply to:

maxnimo: So the Backpack and Messenger are constructed with genuine Italian leather, and also made with water-resistant nylon? You mean half leather, half nylon?
And do you realize that when leather is exposed to moisture or humidity it can get quite nasty?

Very true (and sad)

Link | Posted on Aug 30, 2017 at 17:43 UTC

What about possibility of shooting in raw? This is the only way why I decided not to buy it....

Link | Posted on Aug 23, 2017 at 06:40 UTC as 22nd comment | 1 reply

Sorry to say this, but results correspond with the camera used...

Link | Posted on Aug 11, 2017 at 12:06 UTC as 8th comment

The magic of smartphone regarding photography is you always have it in your pocket and instantly ready for an action. As soon as you need to carry other components, think of their batteries, mount other stuff prior to shooting etc., you miss the elegancy and simplicity. It can be good for specific applications (although why would anyone built such a combo if he can buy an all-in-one camera), but it will never become mass popular.

Link | Posted on Jul 11, 2017 at 16:27 UTC as 41st comment
In reply to:

EXX: What is the difference to any other 35mm lens that I set to f/8 and focus to infinity?

Big. Focusing to infinity doesn't work, in order to have maximum depth of field, you need to focus to hyperfocal length, which in this case is 5,1 m.

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2017 at 14:33 UTC
In reply to:

Martinka: Is it really necessary to have complicated twin focus motors in wideangle lens? I don't think this kind of lens is critical in focus speed and accuracy...

Maybe it's displayed in the camera screen...?

Link | Posted on May 18, 2017 at 09:54 UTC
In reply to:

Martinka: Is it really necessary to have complicated twin focus motors in wideangle lens? I don't think this kind of lens is critical in focus speed and accuracy...

Even old Canon 16-35 can focus quick and accurate without complicated twin-focus design... I'm just saying to me it's overcomplicated with bigger chance to break for no or very little advantage.

Link | Posted on May 18, 2017 at 08:41 UTC
In reply to:

Martinka: Is it really necessary to have complicated twin focus motors in wideangle lens? I don't think this kind of lens is critical in focus speed and accuracy...

Yes, I'm a sports pohotographer and still don't think focusing such a lens is a complicated thing - unlike 70-200, 200/1.8, 85/1.2 and other of my lens. Other manufacturers can do it after all...

Link | Posted on May 18, 2017 at 05:15 UTC
In reply to:

panchorancho: What's the point of going Sony FF, when lenses are the same DSLR size? What a gimmick!

Sensor quality has nothing in common with mirroless...

Link | Posted on May 17, 2017 at 20:22 UTC
Total: 160, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »