riman

Lives in United States Rhode Island, United States
Joined on Dec 28, 2009

Comments

Total: 83, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Back to the action: Nikon D500 Review (1147 comments in total)

Maybe somebody can help me... I have used both cameras and the D750 is much better image than the D500 ..far less noise.. Yet I hardly see any difference here..
I used both the kit lens for the D500 and the same 24-120 FF that I used on my D750 and in both cases the difference at higher ISO 3000+ was very noticable..but not so here..Why is that? I would much prefer the D500 because of the greater spread of focus points but not at the expense of quality

Thanks

Link | Posted on Mar 29, 2017 at 01:05 UTC as 34th comment | 3 replies

Does this mean i can get the same image with a D500 and a 2.8 lens as I can get with a D750 and an F4 lense

Link | Posted on Mar 27, 2017 at 18:16 UTC as 70th comment | 1 reply
On article Video: Sony a6500 First Look (339 comments in total)

How does the image compare with the D500? Better>, worse or about the same?

Link | Posted on Oct 12, 2016 at 18:22 UTC as 14th comment

White background is harsh on my eyes..i opt for black..
BRING BLACK BACK

Link | Posted on Jun 25, 2016 at 13:35 UTC as 85th comment
In reply to:

Coyote_Cody: I could only see 1 single foot print on this fake Ariz desert pic - NASA has got great ways to fake it so well !!

It is thought when sun starts turning red and ballooning out the 'green zone' of life will reach Mars after earth is similar to Venus, and the water at poles melts and at least some life will form on Mars, OR at least after Trump! gets earth blown to pieces from a brainless Nuke war, maybe 1 billion yrs after that.

And yes Trump's dad is an Orangutan, that's where he gets the hair & color & brains !! ;)

Did you catch that old Martian beer can?? Proof of intelligent life!

Link | Posted on Jun 14, 2016 at 13:30 UTC
On article Back to the action: Nikon D500 Review (1147 comments in total)
In reply to:

User9362470513: I moved to Nikon for the D750 and have not been disappointed. And now the D500 looks incredible - compare it to the D300 specs and it shows how spoilt photographers have become with incredible leaps in technology. Well done Nikon for making two game-changing cameras in as many years.

Usere how do you think the D500 compares with the D750 for image quality?

Link | Posted on May 26, 2016 at 16:56 UTC
On article Nikon D500 real-world sample gallery updated (68 comments in total)

Is it my imagination or what but there is another thread here about the D810 and those pics seem to have a much greater tone to them ..is it the camera or the subject or my imagination?
Thanks!

Link | Posted on May 14, 2016 at 11:30 UTC as 16th comment
On article Benchmark Performance: Nikon D810 review (2008 comments in total)

There is another thread on this site about the D500...it is my imagination or do these pics seem to have a much richer tone to them or is it just a difference of subjects?

Link | Posted on May 14, 2016 at 11:29 UTC as 83rd comment | 1 reply
On article Benchmark performance: Nikon D810 in-depth review (245 comments in total)

Really well done!

Link | Posted on May 13, 2016 at 16:03 UTC as 31st comment
On article Making a splash: Nikon D500 real-world sample gallery (225 comments in total)

I wonder if some of the complaints are coming from people with bad monitors? These are as good as the ones from my D750..yet I read all these complaints....I mean how can someone say they are disappointing? What am I missing?

Link | Posted on May 6, 2016 at 02:37 UTC as 17th comment | 6 replies
On article Making a splash: Nikon D500 real-world sample gallery (225 comments in total)

Great color and detail!

Link | Posted on May 6, 2016 at 02:24 UTC as 18th comment
On article Making a splash: Nikon D500 real-world sample gallery (225 comments in total)

I wish you had posted more of the 4000-6000 ISO range...Can you do that? The low ISO is not really a challenge..

Link | Posted on May 3, 2016 at 15:37 UTC as 51st comment
In reply to:

J A C S: Wow, great images and more great images on his site as well! Taken with obsolete gear like the 5D2, the 24-105 and the 16-35/2.8 (he also owns the not so obsolete 100-400II).

Flash powder and flash bulbs are what is meant as obsolete...

Link | Posted on Apr 19, 2016 at 16:42 UTC

How were the people and how was the food?

Link | Posted on Apr 19, 2016 at 16:41 UTC as 7th comment | 1 reply

I wonder how this will be on the D500?

Link | Posted on Apr 14, 2016 at 17:51 UTC as 12th comment
In reply to:

tassosDA: I just added a comment, because the counter stopped at comment no 666!!! :-)

too late! your soul is lost!

Link | Posted on Apr 14, 2016 at 15:32 UTC

man i could take some great selfies of me and my Ferrari!

Link | Posted on Apr 8, 2016 at 00:54 UTC as 48th comment | 2 replies
On article Nikon D5 real-world low light, high ISO samples (279 comments in total)

Looks pretty good to me...I hope the D500 is close

Link | Posted on Apr 7, 2016 at 14:44 UTC as 3rd comment | 3 replies

I have lightroom 5.7 Why cant I just download a D500 file so I can use my existing LR with the D500? Or can I?

Link | Posted on Mar 20, 2016 at 15:56 UTC as 7th comment | 1 reply

can someone explain this to me? and what the benefit is?

if I ever want the camera to stop moving AF points automatically to track, and instead just freeze the AF point while still continuously focusing on the subject if it approaches or recedes, I just hold down the AF-ON button (while keeping the shutter button half-depressed)

and this; I'd often want the camera to stop tracking in the X-Y plane, but continue tracking in depth (refocusing if the subject or photographer approaches or recedes)

Why would you want the camera to stop tracking in the x-y plane but not as it approaches or recedes? That is what I dont get..
Thanks

Link | Posted on Mar 10, 2016 at 03:33 UTC as 8th comment
Total: 83, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »