dash2k8

It was just two years ago when Canon was still get blasted for lack of innovation in their products, and rightly so. Now it is apparent that they decided to keep all their tricks in one bag and...

Not the same thing at all. In the past, the TV/magazines/billboards were only accessible some of the time. Instagram is available 24/7. In the past there were ways to escape negativity, but...

I kindly disagree. It could get pretty rough here sometimes but 'much more toxic' is just your personal opinion. Go see any of the political groups (left or right, doesn't matter) on FB and witness...

Social media is like a school cafeteria without teachers or administrators around. Everyone could be having a good time until a few bad apples decide to bully others and/or get into fights, and...

Buy a gray market phone from anywhere else in the world.

I frequently take family videos with my iPhone. Not going to replace my A7s3 by far, but a lot of times the phone is readily available and can produce acceptable to great results (lighting...

Let me first preface by saying that I appreciate and respect the hard work put into this production. I did, however, find the footage a little hard to watch in certain portions because the frame...

"The only differences are external."

I'm pretty sure it costs significantly less to get the same cosmetic treatment in a custom shop. Just buy a "regular" Leica Q2 at $5,495USD and have it...

I've always maintained that if we could take great pictures with them back then, we could still take great pictures with them today. Slower AF, less DR, etc etc, yes, but their capabilities didn't...

Does this mean one day megapixels won’t matter anymore?

I just can't ever do any photo or design work on a 14" screen. The cluttered interface will drive me blind.

I only rent Zeiss' stuff so the higher prices won't affect me very much.

As you yourself said, you spend more for the speed, so why you acting all surprised that it costs 3x as much? And even if an f4 lens is sharper wide open, its wide open is only f4. And by...

I agree this lens is not top of the line, but awful? And I'm not sure many lenses on any brand's lineup will fare very well on a 100MP sensor.

Thanks to all the replies. I'll give that a try!

My problem with moving on from LR is that my catalog system is married to LR. It would be a pain to start a new one (over 200,000 images) from scratch.

F2 vs F4 will obviously have a huge gap in price difference. Canon's 70-200mm f2.8 lists at $2099 and the f4 is $599. Hello?

Judging from the gallery, I'd say this lens takes very sharp images.

I have three RF lenses (50, 85, 70-200) and all have been optically excellent. Judging by the samples in this gallery, it looks like Canon can't make a bad lens on the RF mount.

I don't know if it's allowed to offer recommendations, but B&H actually lists gray items on their site, though not many.