Lives in United Kingdom London, United Kingdom
Works as a Company Director
Joined on Mar 15, 2010


Total: 66, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »
In reply to:

deep7: I'm not into endless laws but this is a good one. If your work is legitimate, get a licence. If you're perving, spying, or intruding on people's privacy, hopefully you won't get that licence.

deep7 You present a floored argument. - E.G. You might be a professional videographer or just damn good at creative videoing... And your ability to create stunning aerial footage has now been stuffed due to some BS goal-post manoeuvre.. Where you now require a license under a category you will not be eligible to obtain.. I,E a subversive tactic.

Link | Posted on Oct 24, 2016 at 22:06 UTC

So who paid that judge off with the prerequisite back-hander.
Typical goal-post moving tactic by a government in order to keep their thumb pressed down on the pleb masses..

Link | Posted on Oct 24, 2016 at 22:00 UTC as 38th comment

Whilst i agree that the FZ1000 doesn't 'feel' as solid as its contemporaries like the RX10 etc, but does still feel solid enough. How solid and 'premium' does the FZ2000 feel in comparison? Have they 'beefed' it up?

Link | Posted on Sep 26, 2016 at 21:25 UTC as 18th comment

MMMM Big Juicy sensor!

Link | Posted on Sep 25, 2016 at 19:24 UTC as 12th comment
On article Instax goes luxury with Michael Kors collaboration (45 comments in total)

Sellout Junk

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2016 at 22:18 UTC as 17th comment
In reply to:

Frank Bollinger: This article says the FZ1000 has a touchscreen LCD. I haven't located that feature on my FZ1000 and would very much like to know how to find it (I'm happy to see that the FZ2500 does have one).

HATE touch screens on cameras... Your greasy bacteria ridden smartphone is bad enough.. Why anyone (photohgrapher) would want to smeg up their camera screen too...... hmmmmm

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2016 at 12:05 UTC

Nice tweaks, but I look at my FZ1000 and still feel satisfied. :)

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 16:07 UTC as 44th comment | 2 replies

Fanboy cr*p!

Link | Posted on Sep 10, 2016 at 16:44 UTC as 199th comment
In reply to:

robjan245: FZ1000 does NOT have a touchscreen.

Thank god!!!

Link | Posted on Sep 10, 2016 at 10:25 UTC
On article Throwback Thursday: the Samsung NV10 (75 comments in total)

What an old fart i am!
My first digi was the Canon G1 back in early 2001 - all of 3mp!!- A friend of mine still has it after i donated it to them. The Canon Pro1 followed in 2004 - Interesting bridge camera, superbly built, but had its flaws.
Then i had a brief go with the Olympus SP-570 UZ. This camera was extremely well spec-ed for a tiny bridge cam. 26-520mm equiv zoom, sensor shift IS etc etc.. It even had IN CAMERA Pixel remapping AND a bulb mode that went to over 8 minutes!! - Are you Listening, Sony, Canon, Panasonic etc!!! ... but alas the end result pictures looked like oil paintings, and it was very slow shot-to-shot. ..
However i then moved on to the Fuji S100FS 'legend' in 2008 ... This cam saw me through 10000s of images. It too had its quirks, but it took damn fine images! .. The S100FS saw me right up until last year (2015) when i got the FZ1000 - Now this cam is in a league of its own.. It's taken Sony THREE versions of its RX10 to finally exceed it.

Link | Posted on Sep 2, 2016 at 08:33 UTC as 23rd comment
On article Hasselblad True Zoom Moto Mod hands-on preview (154 comments in total)

Here's an idea....... Buy a camera. :-D

Link | Posted on Sep 1, 2016 at 10:06 UTC as 41st comment

Oh well. $23 THOUSAND - and is DIDN'T sell!!! Whilst you still have the asset, as far as liquidising it into hard cash goes, you have 100% of nothing, because you overcooked the reserve. The open market has spoken.
How much is something worth? - How much people are prepared to (or are convinced to) pay, and they weren't prepared to pay what you wanted.
Alas if you try again, the bids offered are invariably never as much as people were prepared to pay the 1st time..
Good luck in any case

Link | Posted on Aug 21, 2016 at 09:52 UTC as 3rd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

villagranvicent: what's the point of his collection? Does he have some historical pieces of photographic equipment or simply buys whatever crap he finds at the local flea market?

villagranvicent = Spoken like a true troll.

Link | Posted on Aug 20, 2016 at 13:21 UTC

Creepy, more like crappy. :-D

Link | Posted on Jul 23, 2016 at 19:39 UTC as 39th comment
In reply to:

photogeek: Whoever is the first to make a rectilinear action cam will own the market.

LOL.. For a moment i thought you said 'rectal' action cam.

Link | Posted on May 24, 2016 at 07:38 UTC

Apart from the extra zoom reach, the FZ1000 still nails it.

Link | Posted on May 13, 2016 at 09:18 UTC as 31st comment | 1 reply

Any clue on the make of the CCD?

Link | Posted on Apr 11, 2016 at 14:28 UTC as 2nd comment
In reply to:

Jim: Why bother with articles like this? It's a complete waste of time, particularly on a camera that has been out for so long. How about concentrating on more camera reviews and lens reviews? This ranks right down there with the lame humorless cartoons that used to be run (which aren't any more, thankfully).

Jim = Miserable Sod! :-D

Link | Posted on Apr 11, 2016 at 14:28 UTC

No so long ago this kind of price could have bought you an apartment to live in!!!

Link | Posted on Apr 8, 2016 at 09:27 UTC as 33rd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

jesus_freak: In true Sony fashion, they have excluded a touch screen yet again.

For $1,500 they could not have included a touch screen?

And wipe your greasy crud covered fingers all over the prime display screen.... No thanks... That tech can stay with mainstream smartphones thank you very much!

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2016 at 16:11 UTC
Total: 66, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »