Skropi

I believe that he means faster AF, not faster regarding f value.

Ah, ok. With the recent influx of trolls, one cant be too careful around here. Yeah, I am not a snob, I mean, shooting m4/3 makes one aware that there is photography beyond FF lol.

If you think you are so much better than everyone else, you really shouldn't bother replying in a simple forum as this one, just publish a new paper for your peers.

I was certain you wouldn't/couldn't answer. Run as many tests as you like. You may discover that m4/3 has less noise and more DR than medium format, who knows?

I never said that smartphones cannot make good images. My post says something different entirely.

Weren't you the one claiming that "most" m4/3 cameras have more noise and less DR than smartphones? What would that comparison mean? We should, obviously, compare aps-c and FF to smartphones ...

I know what Gcam is. Now would you care to answer my question? At BASE iso, m4/3 have more noise and less DR than smartphones?

I don't think he cares about photography. He claimed a smartphone has higher DR and better optics than a 12-100 f4. You think such a person could have any interest at all apart from trolling? This ...

So, are you really saying that most m4/3 cameras, have more noise at BASE iso, and less DR than a smartphone? Nice trolling attempt.

Your need to exhibit all your scientific pedigrees, says a lot about your inferiority complex. In photography, there is one way to measure DR, so there is a common base. Now, with that in mind, ...

I already told you that I know why the sky is blue, try to read more carefully. What I am trying to say is that you cant prove, in a casual conversation, how much deeper blue the skye was today, ...

I didn't say WHY the sky is blue, I said "how", there is a big difference, but people that barely know how to read, certainly cant see the distinction. The proof for the lack of dynamic range is ...

I prefer dedicated cameras to smartphones, but calling all who use smartphones "snapshotters" is wrong. Art can be made with a smartphone as well, no matter its limitations.

He is taking photographs for 50 years, so he probably thinks that his opinion is somehow more valid than anyone else's.

So, your wife can't tell you what to do, but you can tell us what to do? I think there is a new clown in town. Here is your proof, the image quality of the camera you posted is better looking, and ...

Prove what? Can you "prove" how blue the sky is? The phone photo you posted is washed out, it doesnt have a decent dynamic range compared to the camera pic, but if you cant see it, there is ...

It is not my post, and they are not my images. However they do demonstrate the point. A m43 system has options that a smartphone doesnt, such as a 15s shutter.

Your question was if modern smartphones are as good as m43, so the answer given to you demonstrates why they arent. It just goes to show that smartphones simply cant compete. They are ok for ...

Yes, the image from the phone is considerably worse.

I am curious to know how reliable the caf is on this camera. I know that tracking is considered sub par, but caf by itself? Oh, should it be always used with low burst? I dont see how using it ...