motomanDK

The picture presented here is upscaled - a SD15 picture is 4,7Mpix, and this picture is 17Mpix.  So the lack of sharpness t 100% is probably due to the upscaling tool - and/or the upscaling itself. ...

Use ISO 100 and good light - thats how Sigma Foveon cameras work.  Then you get the most wonderful colors and details. If you want low light, buy a SONY A7 III. Use the MC-11 adapter and you can ...

SDQH - low res. 50mm Art 1.4

Could you describe what you do to provoke the error?  I have tried all i can think of and see no errors. Are you on Windows or Mac?  (I use Win10)

24 dgr. in October is very rare ......... and it might confuse the flowers to blossom again? Made with SDQH low res.  I like the result - like my SD15 kameras, just with the 'comfort' of the SDQ!

Even though i have one SD14 and two SD15, i second this statement.

Absolutely!

I just hope they will keep the pixel count (Q-H) and just increase the pixel size..........

If anyone interested: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1F0K7toSxYNyi1BqKoZc-dHJHGjGVBZeS

I am just about to order the new 70-200 Sport ...... is that a bad idea?

I would keep my 2 SD15's ....... no doubt about that.  They are more friendly to use, and they don't 'die' writing to the card like the SD14 do frequently.

I also use Photozoom Pro - please let us hear about the results of your comparison. Thanks!

when the 35mm is SO good?  Can someone explain that? (By the way, i have a 35mm Art that has never been unpacked on the shelf ..... anyone interested?)

If the 70-200 is as good as the other Sport lenses, i will get it - no doubt.  Have been waiting for this lens for years. I have a very old 70-200 HSM version, which is ok on the SD14/15, but does ...

Just one single frame - no SFD or HDR.  Actually i took a SFD picture AND also a 5 shot HDR, but it was so windy, that the leaves/branches are all blurred. SDQ - 50mm Art

I will complain to SIGMA - i never get pictures like that ......... ;-)

I have been shooting SD15 for several years - and when i needed printing from an on-line printing company, they always complained that the files were too small. Then i found PhotoZoom Pro ( http:// ...

You are right - as mentioned earlier in this thread, i removed a pole that was disturbing the picture.  I didn't do a good job though!! :-)

Here is picture no. 4 out of the 7. Please look at the foliage here, it is nearly un-touched. There actually start to build artifacts around the top of the tower - i don't have this on the .tiff on ...

I also have the 18-35 ART and used it on my SDQ for other pictures that day - i am not quite sure about the advice you give me ..... do you think i have the wrong equipment? I did some bad cloning ...