Marcelobtp

Lives in Brazil Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Works as a Student/photographer
Joined on Nov 26, 2010

Comments

Total: 280, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Elevating X-Trans? Fujifilm X-T2 First Impressions Review (1274 comments in total)
In reply to:

Marcelobtp: How images were processed? lightroom? The raws looks terrible.

Thats not the point, i pointed a6300 as it has probably the same sensor and don't have the same problem, is not a relative thing anyway, the letters are completely off, is not a minimal problem, its fairly visible to anyone. Is atrocious, but still, maybe that was not processed on the fuji software or so, that maybe will not show it so badly.
Anyway im not sony fanboy or fanboy of any brand, i would not either buy a6300 for work, maybe for the same reasons that you have, but at least could you take a look and not be blind to it?
Thanks.

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2016 at 16:01 UTC
On article Elevating X-Trans? Fujifilm X-T2 First Impressions Review (1274 comments in total)
In reply to:

Marcelobtp: How images were processed? lightroom? The raws looks terrible.

@Androole Have you compared to the sony a6300?
Neither Jpegs or raws looks good, jpegs suffer from a rather large radius sharpening. Take a look at the text part on the studio, seems the raws are overprocessed so much to get rid of the moire and CA thats is trying to reconstruct the letters, they seems to be floating, looking incomplete or cartoony.
Just terrible, i guess its not a matter of taste in this case.

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2016 at 15:45 UTC
In reply to:

Alex Efimoff: Am I the only one who is not "impressed" by the sample images? And I don't really care about the sharpness.

Are you not impressed by the image quality or by the photographers composition?
Well he did acomplished the purpose of showing DR, sharpness, skin tones, etc...
Technical details.

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2016 at 15:14 UTC

Wow, thats what i call image quality.
Really good colors, clarity sharpness feels very organic.
IF i had the money...

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2016 at 15:11 UTC as 26th comment
On article Elevating X-Trans? Fujifilm X-T2 First Impressions Review (1274 comments in total)
In reply to:

caravan: The a6300 is much,much better and less expensive,nice try though.

@Melchiorum
Take a look on the studio test, the fuji is using such a processing thats completely ruining the detail, seems the Raw already has some moire correction and CA correction embeded. On the letters is kind of ridiculous how bad it looks.
I really like on many aspects, but this time it looks ugly overprocessed.

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2016 at 15:00 UTC
On article Elevating X-Trans? Fujifilm X-T2 First Impressions Review (1274 comments in total)

How images were processed? lightroom? The raws looks terrible.

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2016 at 14:52 UTC as 142nd comment | 6 replies
On article Canon G7 X Mark II added to studio scene (56 comments in total)
In reply to:

Marcelobtp: " At the highest ISOs, 6400 and 12800, the image engine oddly remains unchanged."
To me is night and day, the new g7x has much less color noise on those 2 ISOs, where are you looking at?

You are probably right, sometimes the studio scene doesn't load the images correctly, and shows jpeg while it says raw or vice versa. Looking again, on raw is clearly evident the improvement, while on jpeg not.

Link | Posted on Jul 6, 2016 at 18:13 UTC
On article Special K? Pentax K-1 Review (2651 comments in total)

On raw dynamic range 6 stops pushed pentax does better on iso 100 than nikon on 64.
On some parts the nikon has some purple lines, it remembers me some canons...
Look over the feathers on the top right corner.

Link | Posted on Jul 6, 2016 at 02:33 UTC as 334th comment
On article Canon G7 X Mark II added to studio scene (56 comments in total)

" At the highest ISOs, 6400 and 12800, the image engine oddly remains unchanged."
To me is night and day, the new g7x has much less color noise on those 2 ISOs, where are you looking at?

Link | Posted on Jul 6, 2016 at 02:24 UTC as 4th comment | 3 replies
On article Photographing surfers on Russia's Kamchatka Peninsula (45 comments in total)
In reply to:

Marcelobtp: Must have been a sony sensor, by the lack of reds...

Hehehehe!

Link | Posted on Jun 27, 2016 at 21:13 UTC
On article Photographing surfers on Russia's Kamchatka Peninsula (45 comments in total)

Must have been a sony sensor, by the lack of reds...

Link | Posted on Jun 27, 2016 at 13:59 UTC as 8th comment | 3 replies
On article Medium-format mirrorless: Hasselblad unveils X1D (1190 comments in total)

Want some high res samples, hasselblad site samples are not even 4k resolution...

Link | Posted on Jun 22, 2016 at 15:00 UTC as 212th comment
On article D500 owner formally accuses Nikon of false advertising (475 comments in total)
In reply to:

jadot: Nikon can't be the first or only company who have 'amplified' their message in advertising, surely?

All you "I left Nikon because they don't care about their customers" posters need to get down from your sense of entitlement and move on. It's 2016. Deal with that.

Is 2016 a year thats acceptable to be fooled?

Link | Posted on Jun 17, 2016 at 13:00 UTC
On article Fast telezoom: Sigma 50-100mm F1.8 sample images (164 comments in total)

what camera was used?

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2016 at 15:30 UTC as 29th comment | 5 replies
In reply to:

Marcelobtp: The problem with Pentax is not having enough money to bribe all reviewrs, neither investing hard on under development countrys. South America, India, etc...

Im sorry to say but as Nobby said this is very common in any area, not necessarily exchange money, but there are many ways to incentivate someone to write good reviews for its products, make you confortableon a Hotel, send products for review, etc...
A little bit Naive from your experience i guess, in 28 years of life i've seen to many bribing ocasions, explicit and implicit "deals" it happens in every each type of product for sale.

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2016 at 00:52 UTC
On article Mosh pits and sunsets: Shooting with the Panasonic GX85 (146 comments in total)

OOC Jpegs are looking stunning, i guess this will be my first 4/3s camera.

Link | Posted on Jun 8, 2016 at 23:28 UTC as 3rd comment

The problem with Pentax is not having enough money to bribe all reviewrs, neither investing hard on under development countrys. South America, India, etc...

Link | Posted on Jun 8, 2016 at 23:27 UTC as 90th comment | 5 replies

Unleashing the beast.

Link | Posted on Jun 7, 2016 at 17:29 UTC as 3rd comment
On article Sweet spot: Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 real-world samples (115 comments in total)
In reply to:

Marcelobtp: WOW! that lens looks sharp, contrasty and colorfull, the camera produce very nice colors, im impressed by the image quality

sorry, the 25mm 1.7 that im refering, but all of them are quite good in my opnion.

Link | Posted on Jun 1, 2016 at 19:22 UTC
On article Sweet spot: Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 real-world samples (115 comments in total)

WOW! that lens looks sharp, contrasty and colorfull, the camera produce very nice colors, im impressed by the image quality

Link | Posted on Jun 1, 2016 at 17:09 UTC as 14th comment | 2 replies
Total: 280, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »