role_of_72

Lives in Hungary Hungary
Has a website at https://500px.com/ketamas
Joined on Jun 23, 2011

Comments

Total: 82, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Striding Forth: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Review (1915 comments in total)
In reply to:

role_of_72: I won't have one but it is a really nice camera!

And for those who are desperate because of the 1.65 crop factor in 4K mode: just mount a Sigma 10-20, Tokina 11-16 or Samyang 8mm on it and come back to thank me the good advice. :)

Just named the some simple and cheap (and constant aperture) options.
(You can't say that I don't like Canon glass, just because I do. :) )

But here's the real deal: the Sigma/Tokina/etc. APS-C lenses are made with non-protruding back elements (unlike EF-S ones) and cover the 1.5 crop instead of Canon's 1.6x so one can be sure that they won't hurt the mirror and will cover the wider-than-16:9 video crop of this camera is covered (I don't want to go into calculations now as I have a real life to look after :) )

But there you go, Canon lenses:
- 11-24mm F4 L
- 8-15 F4 L fisheye
- modify an EF-S 10-18 to fit EF and you have STM for your 4K video, too ;)

Option 1 and 2 requires money, for option 3 you will need a saw. :)

Link | Posted on Aug 25, 2016 at 19:59 UTC
On article Striding Forth: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Review (1915 comments in total)

I won't have one but it is a really nice camera!

And for those who are desperate because of the 1.65 crop factor in 4K mode: just mount a Sigma 10-20, Tokina 11-16 or Samyang 8mm on it and come back to thank me the good advice. :)

Link | Posted on Aug 25, 2016 at 17:25 UTC as 315th comment | 9 replies
On article Taking it easy: Canon EOS 80D shooting experience (296 comments in total)

Now just put this sensor to the 110D/SL2 (or to any nice xxxD) and you make me happy for years again! :)

Link | Posted on Mar 25, 2016 at 16:09 UTC as 29th comment
On article Special K? Pentax K-1 Review (2663 comments in total)
In reply to:

D135ima: What about AF coverage zone ???

I guess if you take a look at the mirror you can get an idea of the coverage:

http://www.dpreview.com/files/p/articles/2896376384/Body-Elements/front_nolens.jpeg

Link | Posted on Feb 17, 2016 at 22:43 UTC

Hallelujah! :)

Link | Posted on Feb 17, 2016 at 22:28 UTC as 77th comment
On article Nifty fifty: Hands-on with the Hasselblad H5D-50c Wi-Fi (133 comments in total)
In reply to:

BigOne: No wooden grip? That's not a real Hasselblad!

Too bad they left it out... that would've made it a Stellar camera!

Link | Posted on Feb 11, 2016 at 14:33 UTC
In reply to:

BobYIL: Canon 5DS R with 17, 24, 45 and 90mm TS-E lenses still cost a fraction of this 100MP back..

Probably. But does this exact model have shift movement for panoramas w/o parallax error? (That was the reason for mentioning the tilt-shift lenses at all.)
I think none of the above 3 available lenses have this feature.

But anyway, these are different products for different purposes, so they can be compared only to a certain extent.

Sensor-wise: yes, there IS a difference (although it has its price :) )

Link | Posted on Feb 9, 2016 at 15:07 UTC
In reply to:

BobYIL: Canon 5DS R with 17, 24, 45 and 90mm TS-E lenses still cost a fraction of this 100MP back..

I think BobYIL was referring to the possibility to stitch shifted some images with TS lenses... and for some controllable scenarios that can be comparable maybe we can admit.
(Btw for this purpose D750 won't work w/ the nice Canon ts-e lineup - but Sony maybe).

Obviously if you photograph something else (like anything moving) then you can start comparing RR to Ford of course, as you said.

Link | Posted on Feb 9, 2016 at 11:24 UTC
On article Pocketable APS-C: Fujifilm X70 real-world samples (253 comments in total)
In reply to:

(unknown member): Why so few low ISO samples and so many ISO400 and ISO800 samples shot at lightning conditions allowing to freely use a lower ISO..
The camera is looking good.

Wow, haven't noticed this feature yet on Fuji cameras. Is this something like Canon's Highlight Tone Priority (just with heavier pull of shadows for DR400 for example?)

This may be the cause why some samples seem to be exposed to the highlights? How the raw headroom feels with Fuji cameras in general btw? Thanks!

Link | Posted on Feb 8, 2016 at 21:14 UTC
On article Heavy hitter: Sony FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM first shots (350 comments in total)
In reply to:

Rishi Sanyal: Have any of our readers spotted any samples elsewhere showing F22 sunbursts from this lens? The Canon 24-70 F2.8L II sets an impossibly high bar for sunstar rendition, which'll be important to landscape shooters considering this lens.

@Horshack: this can be subjective to a degree but for most scenarios I find the "double ray" sunstars distracting.
For that certain picture you linked it is quite good I think! However for a distant horizon sunstar it wouldn't suit that well I guess.
Here is Rishi's earlier example (I think it is (c) :) )
http://www.dpreview.com/files/p/articles/3179047006/RishiSanyal-RedTulipSunrise.jpeg
Anyway, the 14-24 remains a benchmark with or without sunstars.

@FastGlassLover: we agree on 8 point sunstars I think :)

Link | Posted on Feb 8, 2016 at 08:11 UTC
On article Heavy hitter: Sony FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM first shots (350 comments in total)
In reply to:

Rishi Sanyal: Have any of our readers spotted any samples elsewhere showing F22 sunbursts from this lens? The Canon 24-70 F2.8L II sets an impossibly high bar for sunstar rendition, which'll be important to landscape shooters considering this lens.

This is one aspect I also like about Canon lenses.

Nikon's 14-24 may be a benchmark for sharpness for example but its sunstars are not that attractive (while the Canon wide angles' are).

I found it surprising but even Canon's 18-135 stm has quite nice stars in this regard (OK, not *that* nice but for the average shooters - like me - is plenty enough :) )

Link | Posted on Feb 6, 2016 at 07:56 UTC
In reply to:

role_of_72: The one funny thing I see in common on most Sony FE lenses is the tube coming from the bayonet to correct the (short) flange distance to approximately DSLR levels, and then comes the actual lens :)

So you have a smaller camera body but if you carry 4 lenses with you as well then you carry that 4 additional tubes... what a great way to save space! (no :) )

No offense, it just came to my mind... sure they will be fantastic lenses.

Yepp, I guess we agree. ;)

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 18:11 UTC
In reply to:

role_of_72: The one funny thing I see in common on most Sony FE lenses is the tube coming from the bayonet to correct the (short) flange distance to approximately DSLR levels, and then comes the actual lens :)

So you have a smaller camera body but if you carry 4 lenses with you as well then you carry that 4 additional tubes... what a great way to save space! (no :) )

No offense, it just came to my mind... sure they will be fantastic lenses.

You can't really be that naive that the obvious afterthought of fitting in a FF sensor behind a small diameter bayonet isn't going to affect lens designs.

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 18:07 UTC
In reply to:

role_of_72: The one funny thing I see in common on most Sony FE lenses is the tube coming from the bayonet to correct the (short) flange distance to approximately DSLR levels, and then comes the actual lens :)

So you have a smaller camera body but if you carry 4 lenses with you as well then you carry that 4 additional tubes... what a great way to save space! (no :) )

No offense, it just came to my mind... sure they will be fantastic lenses.

Can be the case... but then it is barely smaller than a dslr setup again. Anyway, we know that in most cases quality glass cannot be that small. :)

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 17:59 UTC
In reply to:

role_of_72: The one funny thing I see in common on most Sony FE lenses is the tube coming from the bayonet to correct the (short) flange distance to approximately DSLR levels, and then comes the actual lens :)

So you have a smaller camera body but if you carry 4 lenses with you as well then you carry that 4 additional tubes... what a great way to save space! (no :) )

No offense, it just came to my mind... sure they will be fantastic lenses.

Probably, but I'm not 100% sure. At least the tele lens does not have (look at the extender designs).

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 17:49 UTC

The one funny thing I see in common on most Sony FE lenses is the tube coming from the bayonet to correct the (short) flange distance to approximately DSLR levels, and then comes the actual lens :)

So you have a smaller camera body but if you carry 4 lenses with you as well then you carry that 4 additional tubes... what a great way to save space! (no :) )

No offense, it just came to my mind... sure they will be fantastic lenses.

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 17:37 UTC as 112th comment | 9 replies
In reply to:

D200_4me: Small body, large lenses ;-)

Well, it depends on the subjective perception of what 'substantial' means :))

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 17:28 UTC
In reply to:

ZeneticX: $1000 is still cheaper than the recently announced PEN-F and X-Pro2.... go figure

Yepp, but don't forget that those models have good native lens lineups to choose from.

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 15:29 UTC
In reply to:

vinrouge0: Lower resolution than expected but more than enough in reality. Lack of IBIS is a disappointment though many will disagree

Maybe there will be a (bigger?) a7xxx model, too, for the IBIS.

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 15:26 UTC

Well.. great I guess! I'll be curious what reviews say.

((( And some lenses pls :) )))

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 15:23 UTC as 428th comment
Total: 82, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »