Serjojeee

That's mostly a myth IMO - from those who shoot JPG. Cause Canon color is a little bit less contrast and less saturation - I do it sometimes. Where I live people are as white as it gets, cause of ...

F18 for headshots is what doctor ordered with MF. Even for FF F11 is the starting point I believe for this type of shots. That's what I realized very fast. But what bothers me is how Z6/7 will ...

That's what they actually try do - to find out what tool a PRO photographer needs and sell it to him. That's what their business is all about for the last 80 years or so. Agreed. ))) Yes, a ...

OK for some jobs the camera must do that autofocusing fast and also have the fast burst rate. But mostly those cameras are low MP. Either way - if the camera has a low keepers rate that's annoying ...

What's your point on this post? I can make this photos with my 150 usd smartphone. The cheapest camera of them all. If you don't need resolution it's you best option - always in your pocket. And if ...

Yes. Yes. For those there is MF, yes. And they actually want to print huge. Z bodies are for enthusiasts but if you want benefits of mirrorless (including sharper 35/50mm, EVF, IBIS, focus peaking ...

You can not be serious )))) I know lots of people who prefer Nikon (with Sony sensors) to Canon for skin rendering. And I know lots of people who use Sony for landscapes (cause of compact size, ...

I very very very rarely see anyone using less than F8, sometimes more (F11-16 for headshots). For lots of reasons. Mostly cause you control what's in your frame and doesn't need to blur ...

We are here and now. And here and now there is only one Nikon top of the line 1.4 lens - the 1.4 G. And the 1.8 S is better. A bit slower but better optically. And it's weather sealed and fast AF ...

Of course I can. If you are a PRO you sometimes work in the studio, sometimes outside. For studio work almost all fixed focal length lenses are OK, cause at F8 1/200 they are all quite good. It's ...

I think that bold statements are sometimes meaningless. How a company like Nikon can live without a pro grade 35mm? Of course 35 G 1.4 is a pro lens, so is the 35 S - it's sharp, compact, fast and ...

That might be true but we are testing camera systems actually. So that doesn't matter that much IMO.

That's pure nonsense - Nikon best lens so far (35mm) was 35 1.4G, if it's not a pro lens than Nikon doesn't have a pro grade 35 mm lens? I can't care less for Zeiss optics cause they are manual ...

It's sharper than 35 1.4G, it's also not a pro level lens?

Are you aware that they were sharpened the same way? Just admit it - the Fuji lens is sharper. And that's IMO OK - it'a a pricey lens made for 100 MP cameras.

IMO umbrellas are the best modifiers for outside work. Cause they are easy to assemble, they are pretty cheap if they crush and they protect the strobe when they crush - the umbrella shaft of the ...

It looks like Fuji makes some spectacular optics.

It actually looks to be - the best ever. Sharp corner to corner wide open. And the bokeh looks smooth.

That guy have no idea of how to take a picture. Lots of talking and pure absence of any photographic skills.

Understood. Somebody on the web misunderstood the manual I guess cause I heard opposite info about focus peaking function. OK, I'm looking forward for your further tests!