Has a website at www
Joined on Jan 31, 2012


Total: 54, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
In reply to:

perbo: What about the green banding in the sky, is it the aurora?

If you mean the reddish striped pattern in the sky around the main aurora, then yeah it looks like airglow to me, it does have that kind of characteristic pattern. .

Link | Posted on May 2, 2017 at 02:57 UTC
In reply to:

perbo: What about the green banding in the sky, is it the aurora?

No it's called airglow

Link | Posted on Apr 30, 2017 at 00:26 UTC

Does anyone know what camera was used to capture these?

Link | Posted on Apr 23, 2017 at 17:43 UTC as 2nd comment | 1 reply

What's 'lens attachment rate'?

Link | Posted on Apr 4, 2017 at 12:50 UTC as 50th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

Buzz Lightyear: I must say that the responses to this incident have brought some of the most entertaining comments I've yet seen in Dpreview. Certainly a welcome respite from the "I could have done better" . . . or "lousy composition" opinions when Dpreview announces the results of photo contests !

I could have made better tracks than those That guy is an amateur. :P

Link | Posted on Mar 16, 2017 at 16:58 UTC
In reply to:

erotavlas: Kind of dumb to think these drones would be more environmentally friendly than fireworks, since drones are electronics encased in plastic body which are no where near environmentally friendly to produce or deal with when they reach end of life.

@Gary Dean Mercer Clark I think your making assumptions about my post. No where did I say that fireworks have no environmental impact. I merely said that drones can't be considered to have a less environmental impact than fireworks. They both have environmental consequences.

Link | Posted on Mar 12, 2017 at 18:40 UTC
On article Hands-on and in-depth with the Sony a6500 (556 comments in total)
In reply to:

broddesign: I am upgrading from a6000 to a6500. I don't care about video but doing a lot of street photography. Love my a6000 but really need an improvement for low light IQ and stabilization for my prime lenses. In your opinion - is this upgrade worth extra money?

Did you end up upgrading? If so, any improvements from the a6000?

Link | Posted on Feb 27, 2017 at 04:54 UTC

Kind of dumb to think these drones would be more environmentally friendly than fireworks, since drones are electronics encased in plastic body which are no where near environmentally friendly to produce or deal with when they reach end of life.

Link | Posted on Feb 27, 2017 at 00:15 UTC as 7th comment | 3 replies
On article Mobile Speed: Portable SSDs for photographers (205 comments in total)
In reply to:

sh10453: Very good article. Helps a lot of non-technical people.
512GB SSD's are just a little over $100 these days.
One thing these SSD's need (if you write to them or delete from them a lot, is regular maintenance, which is called SSD optimization (no need to go into details here).
Fortunately, Windows 10 now has that feature in its Maintenance Utility (I do not know about Apple products).
You can do it on-demand, or schedule it to be automatically done at various intervals. I would think once a month is good, unless you are using the SSD very heavily.
Mine are scheduled for automatic weekly optimization (including the Windows SSD drive).
One thing about SSD's: DO NOT use the DEFRAG utilities on them. Again, no need for details. Techy people know why.

What you guys are referring to is the TRIM command and it mostly apply to SSD that are connected to the operating system via a SATA connection. TRIM is not enabled by default for external hard drives connected to Mac computers, except of course for Apple SSD. But users have found a way to enable it for third party external SSD connected to Macs over Thunderbolt. As far as I know regardless whether it is Mac or Windows, there is no TRIM support for external SSD connected using USB. Unless they implement some other type of garbage collection on the drive itself.. To be certain connect the external SSD using the eSATA connector, or in the case of using an enclosure you can remove the SSD from enclosure and connect directly to your computer using SATA cable to let the OS perform TRIM on it.

Link | Posted on Dec 3, 2016 at 02:25 UTC
On article Video: Shooting Dog Portraits with the Sony a6300 (191 comments in total)
In reply to:

Marty4650: OK..... you win.
I will go out tomorrow and buy a Sony camera. :)

I'm buying two Sony cameras and a dog!

Link | Posted on Nov 28, 2016 at 23:58 UTC
On article Video: Shooting Dog Portraits with the Sony a6300 (191 comments in total)
In reply to:

mxx: So in the last few days we had:
1. Sony Xperia XZ camera review
2. Five reasons to buy the Sony RX100
3. Shooting dogs with the Sony a6300
Are DPR's salaries being paid by Amazon, or Sony? I'm confused.

They're being paid by dogs.

Link | Posted on Nov 28, 2016 at 23:55 UTC
In reply to:

Romasito: Would love to see a review of a proper backpack, i.e. Peak Design Everyday Backpack - not this one aesthetically awful. Sorry, but this one does not cut the mustard.

Mustard can be cut?

Link | Posted on Nov 7, 2016 at 00:16 UTC
In reply to:

luigibozi: They could just have replaced the SD port with a M.2 SSD port, if they wanted to push things forward. And the camera manufacturers also.
You have an SSD in your camera, take whatever shots and/or video, and plug it in your computer. As simple as that.
THIS would be a step forward, IMO

Not bad, except they need to make the SSD user replaceable like an SD card otherwise if it fails, your camera is useless until you send it in for repair. That would be a pain.

Link | Posted on Nov 5, 2016 at 18:00 UTC
In reply to:

Holscen: Apple, you've gone too far this time, it's good to be bold but you've oversimplified the design to the detriment of practicality.

"Less is not more" in this case, I don't care how slick it looks but that it does what I need it to do, that it does what I used to do - only quicker and better.

By all means upgrade the ports, but give us options, (even just a single legacy USB3 port for your legacy customers who are invested in it ) adapters are a poor solution.

Loss of MagSafe is a backward step too. I hope you listen to the critical feedback and take a step back.

I was always taught that with great design "Form follows function" -

This redesign has the form, but has lost touch with the function.

We are the Sheeple. Lower your expectations and surrender to your overlords. We will add your feedback and ideas to our trash. Your culture will adapt to serve ours. You must comply.

Function is irrelevant. Design is irrelevant. Practicality is irrelevant.

Resistance is futile.

Link | Posted on Nov 4, 2016 at 01:48 UTC
In reply to:

Phillip Lynch: I am not happy that I can't add memory and its overpriced

But it has a touch bar.

Link | Posted on Nov 4, 2016 at 01:27 UTC
In reply to:

kev2033: So, what about it not having image stabilization? I have a Nex7 (yes, I am a dinosuar) with the Zeiss 16-70 F4 but I didnt want to step up to the full frame Sony cameras because:

1. they are bigger and heavier than the Nex7 - they defeat the purpose of a small compact mirrorless camera!
2. they dont have a pop up flash - yeah, I know I can use high ISO and shoot in low light, but I sometimes want fill flash on a person, especially if they are back lit, without over exposing the background. Dont make me go buy a $350 flash, just another thing to carry around
3. Price - the full frames are significantly more money

So, for these reasons, I have held off on getting out of my Nex7, but with the AF advances of this camera and low light capability, I am really thinking on this one. I dont really care about a touch screen.

My two biggest complaints with this camera are:

1. no easy way to move around your AF point (no joystick)
2. no built in image stablization

I used to have touchscreen on the Nex 5N, but after using the a6000 I honestly don't miss having touchscreen.

Link | Posted on Feb 5, 2016 at 01:43 UTC
On article Kodak revives Super 8 with part-digital cine camera (359 comments in total)
In reply to:

mcshan: Next thing you know vinyl albums will come back!

@MikeFairBanks I think recording studios these days use the highest digital quality they can - high sampling frequencies and bit rates of 24 or 32bit. (as opposed to 16bit used in CD) And yes these are better quality than even vinyl. But they can never transfer all the frequencies recorded onto vinyl no matter what source is - digital or analog. I think there a limits to the low and high end range of frequencies, that you can encode in vinyl.

Link | Posted on Jan 8, 2016 at 02:57 UTC
On article Light L16 packs 16 cameras into a single portable body (397 comments in total)

This looks cool, but there's no explanation as to why. Can someone explain what benefit shooting 10 images at different focal lengths and merging them is? And what do the other 6 cameras do?

Link | Posted on Oct 8, 2015 at 22:56 UTC as 129th comment | 6 replies
On article What difference does it make? Sony uncompressed Raw (622 comments in total)
In reply to:

40daystogo: Just so that Sony is made clear on how users feel:

-- I want a third option of: lossless, compressed RAW.

I would have preferred Sony relay this and done it properly, rather than giving us some half-hearted attempt to pacify upset users.

The problem is, now that Sony gives us a half-hearted fix, they might delay the lossless, compressed RAW for a long time, thinking that people are satisfied. We're not.

Sony, given the choice of compressed, lossless RAW, versus uncompressed, mega-big files - what sort of crazy person would want to massively large uncompressed files?

What degree of massiveness are we talking about?

Link | Posted on Sep 24, 2015 at 03:25 UTC

So it now shoots silent films?

Link | Posted on Sep 16, 2015 at 22:51 UTC as 15th comment
Total: 54, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »