Peter Kwok

Peter Kwok

Lives in United States Los Angeles, United States
Works as a Engineer
Joined on Mar 8, 2002
About me:

Love photography, not just gears

Comments

Total: 18, showing: 1 – 18
In reply to:

chshooter: Once again very US specific news. Not everyone lives in the US. It is a pity to see that DPreview has become pretty much US exclusive (although a natural development)

Actually, Phil started DPReview in London. Most of his sample galleries were shot near the Tower Bridge on the banks of Thames.
Phil cashed out by selling it to Amazon, which moved it to Seattle later.

Link | Posted on Jul 10, 2017 at 22:00 UTC
In reply to:

M Chambers: In theory it's legal but depending on the specific actions of the photographers it can be considered illegal if the activity is harassing or obstructing. Also note how this is only in federal court. States, counties, and cities, have recently passed laws making the mere act of photographing the police illegal. I'm no saying I agree with those laws but people shouldn't think that this ruling means they won't get in trouble.

In these cases, the federal circuit courts interpret the US Constitution, which overrides all state and local laws, not just federal laws. Of course, the ruling each federal circuit court only applies to its territory (the 3rd circuit here only covers PA, NJ & DE), but their decisions set a precedence that all other courts respect.

Link | Posted on Jul 10, 2017 at 21:56 UTC

The most important skill is timing. You cannot pray and spray at 10 frames per second. The flashes need to cycle between shots.

Link | Posted on Jun 4, 2017 at 05:51 UTC as 17th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

brycesteiner: Strobes and flashes are not allowed even in high school sports arenas, at least not in Ohio. Specifically forbidden in the state rules as it could be problematic and can be used for the opponent's fans to distract another.
If the pictures were better it would be interesting use for certain.

You can see flashes going off whenever someone go for the basket at NBA games on TV.
In Staples Center in LA, there are 8 channels of remotely fired flash sets, each with 4 strobes high above four corners of the court.

Link | Posted on Jun 4, 2017 at 05:34 UTC
In reply to:

Saurat: So one can fire off srobes in the faces of 7ft tall basketball players during a pro game possibly leading to a missed shot?

The flashes are from the top, not on the camera.
You can see the flashes even on TV, whenever someone attacks the basket.

Link | Posted on Jun 4, 2017 at 05:23 UTC

Too bad. You can't make a film camera this way.

Link | Posted on May 1, 2017 at 21:09 UTC as 30th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

Old Cameras: "Settlement" implies it never went to trial, which is unfortunate. Something tells me that no wrong doing was admitted, just a wad of crumpled cash offered up to make it all go away. They needed to be judged and found guilty with a prescription for change.

The county government spent tax payer's money to make this problem go away.
I wonder what happened to the police officer. They should at least deduct that money from his retirement pay. Since the county did not admit any wrong doings in the settlement, they cannot turn around and punish the police.

The county now has a new set of policy on public's right to take photos. That means money spent to train everybody. At the end, everyone from other police officers to the tax payers lost, except the bad apple.

Link | Posted on Mar 10, 2017 at 00:53 UTC
On article Canon is selling a gray version of the Rebel T6 (147 comments in total)

Only Steve Jobs can announce a different color and make it headline news.

Link | Posted on Nov 10, 2016 at 17:54 UTC as 59th comment

More bulky than a DSLR.
Drain battery as fast as a mirrorless.
More wear on the shutter.

Link | Posted on Apr 1, 2016 at 00:10 UTC as 62nd comment | 1 reply
On article Samsung introduces PM1633a, world's first 2.5" 16TB SSD (121 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mister Joseph: Very nice, how much?

Samsung's consumer grade 850 EVO series 2 TB currently sells for $750. The 16 TB drive here is an enterprise class with 8 times the capacity. It will sell for > 8 times the price. You pay a lot to be on the bleeding edge.
My guess is > $8K.

Link | Posted on Aug 17, 2015 at 21:04 UTC

NOT READY FOR PRIME TIME.

I signed up using my Facebook account.
I first tried to transfer my Facebook photos. It transfer only 1 album (my oldest).

I then tried to upload photos taken at a recent party, hoping to save the time to email them. As it turned out, there is no way to make them public. My friends cannot see them unless they log in as me.
I picked 28 photos to upload from its web interface. Only 26 were loaded. Since all the photos were mixed with my Facebook transfer, there is no easy way to identify what was missing. I created a new album and move them. But this new album ended up with only 23 photos. There is no way to see photos NOT in an album. Managing photos is so primitive.
BTW, it cannot identify the lens used as the 24-105L.

Link | Posted on Jun 6, 2014 at 17:42 UTC as 11th comment
On article Will consumer DSLRs be 'dead in 5 years?' (140 comments in total)

Will DSLRs be killed by mirrorless, or BOTH of them will be killed by smartphones?

Current DSLRs are better than mirrorless in two areas, phase detect AF & real time optical VF. With better electronics & software, mirrorless will catch up on both areas in less than 5 years.

Consumers always favor convenience over picture quality. The current boom of DSLR is not normal. Back in the film day, consumers bought a lot more Kodak Instamatic cameras than SLRs. The SLRs had a short boom in the late 70's starting with the Canon AE-1. When 35mm P&S offered AF, consumers went back to the smaller P&S. Meanwhile, Polaroids sold well because it was fun passing photos around with friends.
Smartphone are today's Polaroids, except their photos are a lot better. They are killing off cameras, starting from the small P&S. The big full frame cameras (DSLR or mirrorless) will survive. However, without the profits from consumer DSLRs, the development of lens & bodies will be reduced.

Link | Posted on Oct 30, 2013 at 01:45 UTC as 36th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Rod McD: Human filing cabinets. Not a leaf to be seen. Sad that it's probably the future in many places.

I would rather have tightly packed, efficient living space so as to leave more empty lands as wilderness, than boring suburban sprawl where everyone has to have a front lawn, a back yard, a 3-car garage, and a 3-car driveway.
Given the same number of people and same area of land, what would you do with your land?

Link | Posted on Aug 27, 2013 at 17:41 UTC
In reply to:

lattesweden: Are you allowed to publish some one elses (the theifs) pictures taken on your stolen gear or is it copyright intrusion from a legal point of view?

"Eavesdropping, wiretapping, invasion of privacy, voyeurism, etc. " are based on expectation of privacy. How much privacy the thief can expect when using someone else' phone with all the apps still installed?

Link | Posted on Aug 8, 2013 at 23:31 UTC
In reply to:

LarryK: Rambus is not so much a technology company, but rather a patent lawsuit mill.

Best to walk away from anything they develop, it's likely just something their attorneys will use to sue people.

Rambus does not spread technology by licensing it. They look for technology similar to theirs and extort $$$ from innovators. They call this licensing, just like mobs selling "protection".

Link | Posted on Feb 28, 2013 at 01:37 UTC
On photo P from Paris in the Alphabet Soup challenge (1 comment in total)

It will be perfect if you level the horizon and adjust for vertical perspective.

Link | Posted on May 4, 2012 at 01:49 UTC as 1st comment
Total: 18, showing: 1 – 18