NorthwestF

BackToNature1, That A9 and R3 comparison is 100% valid. The main thing that R3 has is stacked CMOS censor (not found in R5) that allows it to shoot without any EVF blackouts and without motion...

"For Sony fans, it's always a gimmick until Sony has it.

Like how Canon now has 24 MP stacked CMOS sensor from 2016 Sony A9

BackToNature, you don't know what we are discussing. A1 didn't even exist when R5 was released. A1 like A9 has stacked CMOS sensor with fast readout that allows it to shoot silently without motion...

Does R5 has eye-control AF?

A single new gimmick that can easily be copied by new cameras if it's any good. Is that why it costs $6K when basically it has same tech as 2016 A9?

The main point...

Canon fans: A9 is so overpriced. We have R5 with more MP than A9 that does the same thing as A9 for less $ and more MP

Canon releases R3 with 2016 Sony A9 technology for $6K -- Canon fans: 24...