treepop

treepop

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Mar 8, 2010

Comments

Total: 54, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
On article Canon EOS M100 review (776 comments in total)

No 4k. No Optical sensor stabilization. Very few STM lenses. No thanks. I'm a huge Canon fan boy, but haven't seen anything special out of Canon since the 5D Mark 2.

Link | Posted on Nov 13, 2017 at 06:19 UTC as 16th comment | 2 replies
On article Striding Forth: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Review (2156 comments in total)
In reply to:

jjstier: I have the 5D II and I"m seriously considering the IV. But I'm confused by the raw and jpg quality in the comparison to the II and III. Isn't the purpose of a camera, esp a very expensive camera, to produce excellent images? Am I missing something? Better dynamic range, etc. yet it's saying the image quality is less than my Mark II, I don't understand. Appreciate any explanation.

Oh. I see. You're looking at the comparison tool on the conclusion page. To that, I have to imagine it is incorrect, or only applies to the camera in its own time. So in comparison, the 5D Mark 2, during it's time, was more superior to its peers than the 5D Mark 4 is to its peers.

https://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Canon-EOS-5D-Mark-IV-versus-Canon-EOS-5D-Mark-II___1106_483

This may help.

Link | Posted on Feb 17, 2017 at 22:23 UTC
On article Striding Forth: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Review (2156 comments in total)
In reply to:

jjstier: I have the 5D II and I"m seriously considering the IV. But I'm confused by the raw and jpg quality in the comparison to the II and III. Isn't the purpose of a camera, esp a very expensive camera, to produce excellent images? Am I missing something? Better dynamic range, etc. yet it's saying the image quality is less than my Mark II, I don't understand. Appreciate any explanation.

While the 5D Mark 2 has excellent image quality, I have not read a single review that states the Mark 2 has better image quality than the 3, much less the 4. The 4 will have better dynamic range, more resolution and better low light capabilities. On top of that, the auto focus system is leaps and bounds better. Lastly, it has autofocus while shooting video, which, to me, is a really nice and needed feature. I hope this helps.

Link | Posted on Feb 17, 2017 at 22:20 UTC
On article TIME releases 100 most influential images of all time (165 comments in total)

lol these comments. Yall need to chill out. Seriously. Time was founded in the USA in the 1920s of course most of the photos are based in the USA. This anti US stuff is irritating and myopic to say the least. You can like/dislike them and not have to join a bandwagon rant can't you? Maybe not...evs

Link | Posted on Nov 19, 2016 at 05:19 UTC as 17th comment
On a photo in the Sony a6500 Sample Images sample gallery (4 comments in total)

Probaby testing the ibis...also, on a scene like this, if he wanted everything in focus I would assume he would want to stop it down a bit.

Link | Posted on Nov 19, 2016 at 05:04 UTC as 2nd comment
On article Woof! Sony a6500 sample images are here (366 comments in total)

IQ will be nearly identical to the a6300 if not entirely. The only improvement I could see would be the inclusion of uncompressed raw, or 14bit raw in all modes, due to the better processor. As for its IQ in comparison to the rest of the market, it's still tops.

Link | Posted on Nov 19, 2016 at 05:00 UTC as 43rd comment
On article Video: Capturing nature with the Canon EOS 7D Mark II (209 comments in total)

I loved this! Was watching on my laptop, but enjoyed it so much I shot it over to my 50 inch tv and watched it with my family. Very entertaining and informative! Such high quality, I didn't think I should need to write a comment like this, to encourage dpreview to do more like this, but just in case you weren't sure, I didn't want to miss an opportunity to reinforce, that YES this is very much great content and will keep me coming back for more. (Sorry for the run on sentence.) Great Stuff! Felt like I was watching natgeo.

Link | Posted on Jun 20, 2016 at 16:27 UTC as 15th comment
On a photo in the Nikon D600 Preview Samples sample gallery (14 comments in total)

Canon guy here so I don't know, but isn't the 24-120mm f/4G ED VR a DX lens? So is this shot in DX mode?

Link | Posted on Sep 14, 2012 at 01:53 UTC as 5th comment | 1 reply
On photo DSC_3937 in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (14 comments in total)

Canon guy here so I don't know, but isn't the 24-120mm f/4G ED VR a DX lens? So is this shot in DX mode?

Link | Posted on Sep 14, 2012 at 01:53 UTC as 5th comment | 1 reply

Is this still using the same sensor found on the 7D, 60D, t2i(550D), t3i(600D)???

Link | Posted on Jul 4, 2012 at 16:13 UTC as 25th comment | 2 replies

Why not put IS on the 40mm? Especially since it's supposed to be a video lens...

Link | Posted on Jun 8, 2012 at 12:45 UTC as 52nd comment | 3 replies
On article Just Posted: Canon EOS 5D Mark III review (705 comments in total)
In reply to:

sayed fares: i ' m not fanboy of any manufacturer i have the 2 bodys now in my studio for my employees
my personal camera is Hasselblad
nikon is much more sharper but quality of picture are similar to aps-c sensor canon pictures are very clean and i m talking about image quality at lowest iso ( raw and jpeg )

What? Was this a joke? I am a Canon guy, but saying anything from either DSLR is point and shoot quality is asinine.

Link | Posted on Jun 1, 2012 at 00:49 UTC
On photo DSC_0025 in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (17 comments in total)

Nikkon is just rocken with their sensors. Good stuff.

Link | Posted on Apr 26, 2012 at 14:21 UTC as 3rd comment
On a photo in the Nikon D3200 Preview Samples sample gallery (17 comments in total)

Nikkon is just rocken with their sensors. Good stuff.

Link | Posted on Apr 26, 2012 at 14:21 UTC as 3rd comment

I almost wanna bet this out scores the 5D3

Link | Posted on Apr 20, 2012 at 03:57 UTC as 51st comment | 2 replies

Me mad at Canon for their price gouging and lack of R&D :(

Link | Posted on Apr 20, 2012 at 03:56 UTC as 41st comment | 5 replies
On article Canon acknowledges 'light leak' in the EOS 5D Mark III (257 comments in total)

Where is the review?

Link | Posted on Apr 17, 2012 at 17:00 UTC as 51st comment | 1 reply

It seems like Canon is getting a bit too segmented. I dunno. it seems like these features should have been included in the $7,000.00 1D X. I mean $7000! seriously!? No. They need $15,000.00 for these features....that's nutso expensive.

Link | Posted on Apr 12, 2012 at 17:15 UTC as 88th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

GabrielZ: 4K should of been available on the 5DMkIII at launch, it's more appropriate on a DSLR of that type and would of been a killer feature that offset some of the disappointent amongst enthusiasts over that camera's spec and price point.

Then how would they entice people to buy this $15,000.00 behemoth?

Link | Posted on Apr 12, 2012 at 17:11 UTC

What a beast!

Link | Posted on Apr 12, 2012 at 17:08 UTC as 91st comment
Total: 54, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »