paolop23

The satistic in this thread (see screenshot above) supports my conlclusion. m43 seems to be for oldtimers, make of that what you will. Maybe the reason is that m43 cateres to exactly that group, i ...

statistically speaking thats not what this poll tells us. If we follow these results, out of 100 people using m43, 22 would be in the 20-49 bracket while out of 100 using fuji, almost 50 would be ...

whats your point? this is the astounding truth of what came up when i searched for "switched to micro four thirs / fuji apsc". I took the screenshot of those posts with a picture of the creator ...

m43 is for old timers, theres no denying. fuji is considered stylish which attracts younger people, thats easily noticed when looking for content on youtube . youll find old white guys for m43 and ...

IMO it makes no sense to go for m43 gear if you want fast glass in the 35-135mm equiv range... One of the biggest upside of chosing FF for portraits is theres lenses like the Tamron 35-150f2-2.8, ...

yes the 75f1.8 is pretty unique. The manual 135mmf3.5 have been mentioned (very cheap like $20 i read) but theres nothing available with AF. You could crop the 61MP A7R4 with the Samyang AF 75f1.8 ...

DXO is both a blessing and a curse.
Many people in the MFT community love to make their image look plastic fantastic.
I like the editing on the gallery alot because theres still noise visible...

exceptional gallery and awesome location.
I really like the editing too, much better than 99% of the MFT images we see (esp on forums) usually with noisereduction/sharpering sliders taken to...

as stated by others already, you can easily calculate the entrance pupil = blur potential by dividing the focal length by the aperture. for reference heres some popular lenses used commonly for ...

that might be a reason, but most are probably just using their phone instead of dedicated camera. judging by youtube photographers i have a feeling many have also been drawn into FF systems.

i looked that one up, https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/55251529 it will be intersting to see if we lost the younger user base (not just people aging by 7yrs), thats a feeling that i get here in ...

considering how much bad press Olympus had to endure over the last years its very likely that the best (used) price/perfromance can be found among the E-M1/M5 cameras right now. The E-M1m2 is ...

you need to understand that you have no control over how your images are presented to the viewers here. While one will view the previews in the thread on a smarpthone the other one might use a 32" ...

if you check ebay US for completed listings you will find the G9 selling used for between $600-800 and the G95 for $400-600. So you can save $200 when choosing the G95 over the G9. I dont know if ...

That is exactly how i do it too (with my GRii and my camelbak mule backpack) you can read my other thoughts here in this thread https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/66314194 I love the dynamic ...

the images look totally fine in the thread previews in terms of sharpness. But those are smaller previews that got resized to 560x420 ( https://2.img-dpreview.com/files/p/TS560x560~forums/66366031/ ...

when photography and sports collide i turn to the Ricoh GR, for me it simply is the best option when trying to get the best IQ when doing activities. Usually i dont put photography above sports so ...

Since a few years it seems FF is the way to go. And i think its true for everything but wildlife. While a flagship FF with 600mm prime eats APSC/M43 for breakfeast, its also heavy and ...

focus is infront of the bird both times, its better in the 2nd one. so i guess af was not accurate enough. were these the better or worse shots from a burst?

This is a FF-SLR lens, possibly you can adapt it (search OM to m43 adapter), but you will not be able to focus (no real helicoid) or use the aperture (no aperture ring). Full manual SLR lenses are ...