ttran88

What about cropping the price in proportions to the sensor size Olympus?

Tomasz_wk, same goes for a Sony ff shooter, they wouldn’t buy APS-C lenses for their second body (A6x000). And if I wanted to stay with APS-C lenses only I would much prefer sigma ART 30mm f1.4,...

In regards to AF test It’s a No Child Left Behind policy around here. You’ll probably have to wait for the others to get near Sony’s before DPR can make the test more complex.

New sensor, new bad@$$ AF, build quality, better video looks like a whole new camera.

Looks like the team had lots of fun!

You’ll miss out on the newer sensor found in the a6300-a6500. It’s really a good stop improvement over the A6000. Also having AF-C eye AF only found in the newer sensor will change the way you...

The real question is, do you even know how to turn it on?

Lots of folks are doing very well with FE lenses on their A7 and A6xxx series. Much better than having to buy separate fujifilm lenses and Sony FE lenses.

You want Sony to include a bird 🐦 with your camera? I guess you can’t win them all.

Digging deep to find flaws....

I’ll take that over lousy AF performance any day of the week.

I was thinking exactly the same, EOS R actually seems a whole lot less competitive to the A6400. ;)

Sony won’t replace the A6000, they will keep it as the entry level e mount. A6300 will take a big price cut and will fill the price bracket for A6000. So I don’t see what the big deal (Ouch) is all...

For some Sony users sure it’s meh, we already have great options. But to other mount shooters they are watching real carefully to see what’s the next big thing. And secretly hoping one day in the...

Being a Sony FE shooter I have no idea what you’re talking about.

Go cry me a river! You’re the same foolio who said Sony’s are junk and a toy. You can diss but can’t take a diss back? Be a man and suck it up! And seriously imaginary and fake eye AF is only found...

Yes it’s called Z6’s I promise I will add eye AF sometime in the future ;p

samhain, for reals! And having had experience with the Nikon in question and the Sony 16-50. I would honestly prefer the 16-50 for it’s super compact size and it’s 16mm wide angle. The Sony also...

It feels like everyone is looking at Sony for the next big thing.. my how the times have changed.

I don’t know man, should I switch to Nikon for it’s 18-55mm for $100??