tireur

Lives in Germany Delmenhorst, Germany
Works as a Photographer
Has a website at www.burkhard-juettner.de
Joined on Jan 22, 2010

Comments

Total: 16, showing: 1 – 16
In reply to:

tireur: Wrong, Apple Germany told me: both cameras have image stabilisation.

At least, they wrote it in the answer of my written question. Other results would be an attempt to deceive...

Link | Posted on Sep 13, 2016 at 13:35 UTC

Wrong, Apple Germany told me: both cameras have image stabilisation.

Link | Posted on Sep 13, 2016 at 07:22 UTC as 7th comment | 9 replies
On article Apple to cease development of Aperture (425 comments in total)
In reply to:

WildSammy: I switched from LR to Aperture, now is Apple dropping Aperture.. so any ideas on Aperture replacement? Capture One or Aftershot? I liked Aperture was like PS and LR together in one app.. this will be missing me :-(

Try Phase1 - Capture1. Best rendering you can get at the moment.
The administration of your photolibrary although is not optimal yet.

Link | Posted on Jun 30, 2014 at 09:00 UTC
In reply to:

tireur: Indeed very interesting for art photographers. Getting an ISBN is only possible if you find a publisher for your project. But the ISB Nummer of a book is the base for being accepted in official collections and public libraries. One question remains: what about the presentation copy for the national library? Who pays for it?

Not true in Germany: only professional publishers get an ISBN.

Link | Posted on Jun 13, 2014 at 14:06 UTC

Indeed very interesting for art photographers. Getting an ISBN is only possible if you find a publisher for your project. But the ISB Nummer of a book is the base for being accepted in official collections and public libraries. One question remains: what about the presentation copy for the national library? Who pays for it?

Link | Posted on Apr 23, 2014 at 07:09 UTC as 3rd comment | 3 replies
On article Olympus OM-D E-M1 Review (2082 comments in total)
In reply to:

tireur: Can't understand it: RAW and JPEG look much better from the E-M5. More resolution than the new sensor. Is Dpreview sure having not interchanged the pictures? They took the same lens? Which one?

As I do not own FT lenses, I won't profit from phase detection, if I got it right. So lost pixels for me?

Link | Posted on Sep 10, 2013 at 15:21 UTC
On article Olympus OM-D E-M1 Review (2082 comments in total)
In reply to:

tireur: Can't understand it: RAW and JPEG look much better from the E-M5. More resolution than the new sensor. Is Dpreview sure having not interchanged the pictures? They took the same lens? Which one?

Dpreview really should work at it, otherwise it is confusing. By the way I own the E M5 and as a pro, I am very happy with IQ. If I buy this camera, i do not want to downgrade IQ.

Link | Posted on Sep 10, 2013 at 14:56 UTC
On article Olympus OM-D E-M1 Review (2082 comments in total)

Can't understand it: RAW and JPEG look much better from the E-M5. More resolution than the new sensor. Is Dpreview sure having not interchanged the pictures? They took the same lens? Which one?

Link | Posted on Sep 10, 2013 at 14:33 UTC as 453rd comment | 7 replies
On article Photoshop CC: Adobe responds to reaction (1852 comments in total)

hendrickson: ... we do envision added functionality for CC members using Lightroom. Does it mean, we will see in future Lightroom Elements and Lightoom CC? Users, be aware of it. LR is a product which was developed by controlling interest of the community. Remember Adobe? Shame at your greed of gain.

Link | Posted on May 8, 2013 at 07:00 UTC as 606th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

ArcaSwiss: Just watch a version with Retina Display support will soon appear on the Cloud versions. Not that I really care I'm sticking with PSCS6 and gonna take a look at Aperture. I use a medium format digital back so Capture One is my raw converter.

Yes, STILL available...

Link | Posted on May 7, 2013 at 15:17 UTC
On article Adobe releases Lightroom 4.3 and Adobe Camera Raw 7.3 (69 comments in total)

Lets thank and praise Adobe that we can download the update instead of putting it into the the clowd...

Link | Posted on Dec 14, 2012 at 07:30 UTC as 9th comment
On article Coming soon: Lens Reviews to return to dpreview.com (272 comments in total)
In reply to:

emircruz: yeah, the same dxo that cant release the e-m5 sensor results because... well your guess is as good as mine.

Rubbish: look at their site first before posting: http://www.dxomark.com/

Link | Posted on Oct 4, 2012 at 06:20 UTC
On article Coming soon: Lens Reviews to return to dpreview.com (272 comments in total)
In reply to:

Denis James Evans: Keep dxo's biases out of the camera reviews. If dxo has any influence in the camera reviews, I will never visit this site again. Dxo is a blight on the industry!

Rubbish, look at their site first before posting: http://www.dxomark.com

Link | Posted on Oct 4, 2012 at 06:19 UTC

An absolutly must have for the G1 X. The earlier version already did an excellent job with raws from the Canon G12.

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2012 at 15:43 UTC as 18th comment

I would like the idea that the guys of dxo and oloneo have a good bottle of redwine together. Perhaps we would see at last the promised hdr engine in dxo...

Link | Posted on Dec 17, 2011 at 08:20 UTC as 21st comment
On article Just posted: Our Sony NEX-7 in-depth review (338 comments in total)

No cable release??? Not for me as professional photographer. And the lenses...

Link | Posted on Dec 14, 2011 at 09:59 UTC as 70th comment | 2 replies
Total: 16, showing: 1 – 16