Viggo

I sold my 1dx2 along with my 85 L IS and 35 L II and went for the R and RF50 f1.2 and I haven’t regretted one second. In fact I’ve never been THIS happy with a camera ever. There is no reason to...

Still with the specs... sigh...

Utter BS, you really do live in your own little bubble don’t you? Most pro’s are using Canon since forever, that will not change. Just because they have released entry- and mid level bodies now...

Yes, close to the mount, in grey.

*compared with the A9 (5 fps mechanical)

... and yet no one can show me awardwinning photos shot with a Sony that was impossible with a Canon.

.. and yet, Canon is still on top. Nikon bought Sony sensors, it doesn’t seem to help the new...

You have no idea how good the AF in the R is.. really not..

Congratulations on writing the dumbest thing I’ve read all week....

Let’s go to the same source that says Canon sensors suck and all the award wining shots that could only be taken by a Sony, lets use that source 🙃

Adapter in the box, use the 50 f1.8 stm and have an extremely light and capable FF setup👍🏽

Mine is set to sleep in 15 seconds, it works really well for walking around. The R is rated to 330 shots, but in the cold I average 700 shots on a charge over a two week period. In warmer weather...

Guess you missed the RF 35 and the RF 70-200 then..

Focus stacking and Eye-AF at least are in the RP, but not yet in the R, will come with firmware👍🏽

Spidermoon:

Lack of lenses? How hard it would be to give existing lenses RF mount? They have that included in the box, an adapter that gives you the option to use ANY EF and EF-s with the R and...

Jesus, this Sony troll BS is getting older than dirt...

For anyone who paid attention it will come after the bug fix.

A firmware with larger updates will come shortly.

Oh, come on! Every camera ever has confirmed focus, but at 1:1 it’s a missed shot. Shooting at f1.4 etc and this number increases. To say just because a camera confirms focus in a burst means that...

I haven’t had face detect tracking miss an eye at f1.2 yet, why do I need a special square around an eye when it hits there anyway? The answer is, you don’t. Nothing wrong with it, but in camera...

Yes, the dog shots from the previous gallery were mostly off. And, perhaps because of electronic shutter(?), the ones that looked focused had weird motion blur at 1/2000s. And a big difference in...