Idaho_X

@Roland Karlsson - yes, i know :) But it seems that everything today is about gear, youtubers tell you that you need the fanciest lenses, the newest mirrorless full frame camera, etc. So it's a bit...

Very nice photos! Good to see that you don't need crazy expensive F1.x lenses for ladscape photography.

It depends on what you need ;-)
Nikon Z6 and Sony A7 III are less expensive (prices Central Europe). There is not much difference in weight. Fuji 16-55 is heavier than equivalent Nikon or Tamron...

Also depends on what lens it is. "Hyped" lenses are more expensive used than those nobody is talking about. Just bought a Nikon DX 12-24 in very good condition (looks like new) from a camera store ...

Again no photos with the kit lenses :(
(18-55 or 16-80)
Not everyone wants to buy the heavy and expensive 16-55.

I tested a new X-H1 in a camera store yesterday that is sold for 799 Euros.
The only downside is, that you don't get the kit lenses to this camera so you have to pay the full price. So for someone...

isn't that grey market? how's the Fuji warranty covered there?

They don't become better when you download and open them in Capture One.
One of the problems (in my opinion) is, that the photographer shot most of the landscape images at F2.8 and F4.

Thank you! Missing some images taken with the 18-55 or 16-80 kit lenses ;-)

That's gonna be a 24-105 or so. Hoping for a 20-85

I know that IQ isn't everything. It depends what you need and what's most important for you ... And IQ is highly dependend from the lens.
I like the X-T4 but I wouldn't buy it for that price (for...

thank you! but why no RAW-samples with the kit-lens?

Maybe as a whole package it "runs circles around the ones". Image quality is almost the same for every APS-C camera. dpreview also gave other cameras the same score than the Fuji. Many tests rate...

I agree. Don't understand what Nikon is doing here.
We need smaller prime lenses for Z DX and also Z full frame. It should be possible to build affordable, small and high quality primes.

I just downloaded some of your RAW sample images (thank you!) of the Z50 to edit them in Capture One and was a bit "shocked" about the image quality of the 16-50 kit lens.
My expectations (which...

In image quality it's not the best. Check out the dpreview comparison tool. There it's average (especially in the corners), behind a A6400, Nikon Z50, Canon 90d, ...

@Richard Butler could you please explain how your comparison tool works? What lenses do you use for the test?
I really love the X-T4's design and the camera but in my view at lowest ISO and in RAW...

Can someone please explain how these studio comparison images are made - how this works?
What lenses are on the camera? Why are (for example) the Fuji X-T3 and X-T4 (which are named to be the...

Played with the X-T4 today in a local camera store.
Looks very good, feels good, BUT: the screen hinge seems very fragile!
Compared it with the Panasonic G9 and with a old Nikon D5100 I own and...